Number of purchasers: 0, views: 438
Readers community rating: votes 0
1. Albrecht, M. von 2004: Istoriya rimskoy literatury [A History of Roman Literature]. Vol. II. Moscow.
2. Andreev, Yu.V. 1990: Poeziya mifa i proza istorii [Poetry of Myth and Prose of History]. Leningrad.
3. Arena, V. 2012: Libertas and the Practice of Politics in the Late Roman Republic. Cambridge.
4. Arena, V. 2021: Liberty and the Rule of Law. In: P. Cartledge, C. Atack (eds.), A Cultural History of Democracy in Antiquity. Vol. I. London–New York–Oxford–New Delhi–Sydney, 37–56.
5. Balmaceda, C. 2020: Libertas in Early Latin Authors. In: C. Balmaceda (ed.), Libertas and Res Publica in the Roman Republic: Ideas of Freedom and Roman Politics. Leiden–Boston, 33–54.
6. Barchiesi, A. 1997: The Poet and the Prince: Ovid and Augustan Discourse. Berkeley–Los Angeles–London.
7. Basley, K. 2010: Between Two Lives: Tiresias and the Law in Ovid’s Metamorphoses. Dictynna 7, 13–31.
8. Basley, K. 2011: Truthseeking and Truthmaking in Ovid’s Metamorphoses 1.163–245. Law and Literature 23/1, 48–70.
9. Bowditch, Ph. L. 1994: Horace's Poetics of Political Integrity: Epistle 1.18. The American Journal of Philology 115/3, 409–426.
10. Brown, S.A. 2005: Ovid: Myth and Metamorphosis. London.
11. Brunt, P.A. 1988: The Fall of the Roman Republic and Related Essays. Oxford.
12. Casali, S. 2006: The Art of Making Oneself Hated: Rethinking (Anti-)Augustanism in Ovid’s Ars Amatoria. In: R. Gibson, S. Green, A. Sharrock (eds.), The Art of Love: Bimillennial Essays on Ovid’s Ars Amatoria and Remedia Amoris. Oxford, 216–234.
13. Coleman, K.M. 1990: Tiresias the Judge: Ovid, Metamorphoses 3.322–38. The Classical Quarterly 40/2, 571–577.
14. Crook, J.A. 1967: Law and Life of Rome (Aspects of Greek and Roman Life). London.
15. Danilov, E.S. 2017: [Securitas in “Panegyrici Latini”]. Problemy istorii, filologii, kul’tury [Journal of Historical, Philological and Cultural Studies] 3, 81–89.
16. Davis, P.J. 1999: Ovid’s Amores: A Political Reading. Classical Philology 94/4, 431–449.
17. Davis, P.J. 2016: Freedom of Speech in Virgil and Ovid. In: P. Mitsis, I. Ziogas (ed.), Wordplay and Powerplay in Latin Poetry. Berlin–Boston, 183–198.
18. Devine, A.M. 1978: A Study of the Aristocratic Ideal and the Theme of Moral Decline in Latin Love Elegy. PhD Thesis. University of Tasmania. Hobart.
19. Drinkwater, M.O. 2013: Militia amoris: Fighting in love’s army // In: T.S. Thorsen (ed.), The Cambridge companion to Latin love elegy. Cambridge, 194–206.
20. Durov, V.S. 2000: Istoriya rimskoy literatury [A History of Roman Literature]. Saint Petersburg.
21. Eckerman, Ch. 2016: Freedom and Slavery in Vergil's Eclogue 1. Wiener Studien 129, 257–280.
22. Feldherr, A. 2010: Playing Gods: Ovid's Metamorphoses and the Politics of Fiction. Princeton– Oxford.
23. Fraenkel, E. 1957: Horace. Oxford.
24. Galinsky, K. 1975: Ovid's Metamorphoses: An Introduction to the Basic Aspects. Berkeley–Los Angeles.
25. Galinsky, K. 2006: Vergil's Uses of “Libertas”: Texts and Contexts. Vergilius 52, 3–19.
26. Galinsky, K. 2017: [Augustan Literature and Augustan “Ideology”: an Ongoing Reassessment]. Shagi / Steps [Steps / Steps] 3/4, 151–167.
27. Gebhardt, U.C.J. 2009: Sermo Iuris: Rechtssprache und Recht in der augusteischen Dichtung. Leiden–Boston.
28. Hollis, A.S. 1994: Rights of Way in Ovid (Heroides 20.146) and Plautus (Curculio 36). The Classical Quarterly 44/2, 545–549.
29. Janan, M. 2001: The Politics of Desire: Propertius IV. Berkeley–Los Angeles–London.
30. Johnston, P.A. 2006: Turnus, Horses, and “Libertas”. Vergilius 52, 20–31.
31. Kenney, E.J. 1969: Ovid and the Law. Yale Classical Sudies 21, 241–263.
32. Kenney, E.J. 1970: Love and Legalism: Ovid, Heroides 20 and 21. Arion 9/4, 388–414.
33. Kennedy, D.F. 1992: “Augustan” and “Anti-Augustan”: Reflections on Terms of Reference. In: A. Powell (ed.) Roman Poetry and Propaganda in the Age of Augustus. London, 26–58.
34. Knabe, G.S. 1994: [Rome of Titus Livy – Image, Myth and History]. In: Tit Livy, Istoriya Rima ot osnovaniya goroda [The History of Rome from its Foundation]. Vol. III. Moscow, 590–655.
35. Kudryavtseva, T.V. 2015: [Peace plea and opposition to war in the Roman poetry of the Civil Wars epoch]. Mnemon. Issledovaniia i publikatsii po istorii antichnogo mira [Mnemon. Research and publications on the history of the Ancient World] 15, 329–339.
36. Lefèvre, E. 1998: Vergil as a Republican: Aeneid 6.815–35. In: H.P. Stahl (ed.), Vergil's Aeneid: Augustan Epic and Political Context. London, 101–118.
37. Lowrie, M. 2009: Writing, Performance, and Authority in Augustan Rome. Oxford–New York.
38. Lowrie, M. 2010: Vergil and Founding Violence. In: J. Farrell, M.C.J. Putnam (eds.), A Companion to Vergil’s Aeneid and Its Tradition. Malden–MA–Oxford, 391–403.
39. Makhlayuk, A.V. 2019: [The Space of the Roman World in “the Res gestae divi Augusti”]. Vestnik drevney istorii [Journal of Ancient History] 3, 653–677.
40. Mazurek, T. 1997: Self-Parody and the Law in Horace's “Satires” 1.9. The Classical Journal 93/1, 1–17.
41. McGinn, Th.A.J. 2001: Satire and the law: the case of Horace. The Cambridge Classical Journal 47, 81–102.
42. McGowan, M.M. 2009: Ovid in Exile: Power and Poetic Redress in the Tristia and Epistulae ex Ponto. Leiden–Boston.
43. Mezheritskiy, Ja.Yu. 2016: “Vosstanovlennaya respublika” imperatora Avgusta [Emperor Augustus’ “Restored Republic”]. Moscow.
44. Milnor, K. 2005: Gender, Domesticity, and the Age of Augustus: Inventing Private Life. New York.
45. Moreva-Vulikh, N.V. 2000: Rimskiy klassitsizm: tvorchestvo Vergiliya, lirika Goratsiya [Roman Classicism: Virgil’s Works, Horace’s Lyrics]. Saint Petersburg.
46. Osherov, S.A. 1983: [Ovid’s lyrics and epic]. In: Ovid, Lyubovnye elegii. Metamorfozy. Skorbnye elegii [Amores. Metamorphoses. Tristia]. Moscow, 3–22.
47. Pavlock, B. 1998: Daedalus in the Labyrinth of Ovid's “Metamorphoses”. The Classical World 92/2, 141–157.
48. Pavlock, B. 2009: The Image of the Poet in Ovid's Metamorphoses. Madison–Wisconsin.
49. Pokrovskiy, M.M. 1907: Ocherki po rimskoy istorii i literature [Essays on Roman History and Literature]. Saint Petersburg.
50. Rich, J.W., Williams, J.H.C. 1999: Leges et Iura P.R. Restituit: A New Aureus of Octavian and the Settelement of 28–27 B.C. The Numismatic Chronicle 159, 169–213.
51. Schmidt, E.A. 2001: The Meaning of Vergil’s “Aeneid”: American and German Approaches. Classical World 94/2, 145–171.
52. Segal, Ch. 1989: Orpheus: The Myth of the Poet. Baltimore–London.
53. Shtaerman, E.M. 1985: [From Citizen to Subject]. In: E.S. Golubtsova (ed.), Kul'tura drevnego Rima [Culture of Ancient Rome]. Vol. I. Moscow, 22–105.
54. Shumilin, M.V. 2015: [Political Context of Roman Poetry]. Shagi / Steps [Steps / Steps] 1, 213–222.
55. Smith, R.A. 2006: Books in Search of a Library: Ovid's “Response” to Augustan “Libertas”. Vergilius 52, 45–54.
56. Tatum, W.J. 1998: Ultra legem: Law and literature in Horace, Satires II.1. Mnemosyne 51/6, 688–699.
57. Tokarev, A.N. 2011: Stanovlenie ofitsial’noy ideologii printsipata imperatora Avgusta [Formation of the Official Ideology of the Emperor Augustus’ Principate]. Kharkiv.
58. Tronskiy, I.M. 1988: Istoriya antichnoy literatury [A History of Ancient Literature]. Moscow.
59. Usov, D.A. 2021: [Libertas as interpreted by Ovid: freedom or willfulness?]. Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Seriya 8. Istoriya [Moscow University Bulletin. Series 8. History] 4, 3–18.
60. VerSteeg, R., Barclay, N. 2003: Rhetoric and Law in Ovid's Orpheus. Law and Literature 15/3, 395–420.
61. Von der Osten, D.E. 2006: The Cult of the Goddess “Libertas” in Rome and Its Reflection in Ovid's Poetry and Tibullan Love Elegy. Vergilius 52, 32–44.
62. Wirszubski, Ch. 1968: Libertas as a Political Idea at Rome during the Late Republic and Early Principate. Cambridge.
63. Wyke, M. 1989: Mistress and Metaphor in Augustan Elegy. Helios 16, 25–47.
64. Ziogas, I. 2016: Orpheus and the Law: The Story of Myrrha in Ovid’s Metamorphoses. Law in Context 34/1, 24–41.
65. Ziogas, I. 2021: Law and Love in Ovid: Courting Justice in the Age of Augustus. Oxford.