Epistemic Justice for the Dead (transl. by N.V. Romanovsky)

The classics of social theory have a peculiar status: our current list is the product of past academic strategizing, and the list of favored classics has changed. Currently there is a process of replacing them with older writers who better fit current concerns, and to cancel those who hold the wrong views, or are of the oppressor class, in order to provide epistemic justice for those who don’t deserve their status and uplift those who were wrongly neglected. From an instrumental, careerist point of view, adapting to these changes makes sense. From the point of view of judgement, which differs from the capacity to produce, it does not. Exclusions narrow our range of reference and our capacity to assess in the present. We owe ourselves, and them, not only temporary, fashion driven justice but a larger capacity of judgement detached from the instrumentalization of scholarship.

Keywords

cancellation culture, systemic justice, Merton, public sociology, classics of sociology

Received

02.05.2023

Publication date

12.07.2023

Number of characters

42885

Cite

GOST	Turner S. Epistemic Justice for the Dead (transl. by N.V. Romanovsky) // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya – 2023. – Issue 4 C. 15-27 [Electronic resource]. URL: http://ras.jes.su/socis/s013216250025449-6-1-en (circulation date: 08.12.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S013216250025449-6
MLA	Turner, Stephen P "Epistemic Justice for the Dead (transl. by N.V. Romanovsky)." Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya 4 (2023):15-27. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250025449-6
APA	Turner S. (2023). Epistemic Justice for the Dead (transl. by N.V. Romanovsky). Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya (4), pp.15-27 DOI: 10.31857/S013216250025449-6

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 338

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Barnes H.E. (ed.) (1948) An Introduction to the History of Sociology. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
2. Barnes H.E., Becker H. (1938) Social Thought from Lore to Science. New York, NY: Heath & Company.
3. Becker E. (1968) The Structure of Evil. New York, NY: Free Press.
4. Becker E. (1971) The Lost Science of Man. New York, NY: George Braziller.
5. Bendix R. (1960) Max Weber: An Intellectual Portrait. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
6. Blau P.M. (ed.) (1975) Approaches to the Study of Social Structure. New York, NY: Free Press.
7. Bliss W.D.P. (ed.) (1897) The Encyclopedia of Social Reform. New York, NY: Funk & Wagnalls Co. URL: https://archive.org/details/encyclopediofsoc00blisrich  (accessed 05.01.2021).
8. Bogardus E.S. ([1940] 1960) The Development of Social Thought. New York, NY: David McKay & Company.
9. Chambliss R. (1954) Social Thought: From Hammurabi to Comte. New York, NY: The Dryden Press.
10. Collins H. (2004) Interactional expertise as a third kind of knowledge. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences. No. 3: 125–143.
11. Ellwood C. (1938) A History of Social Philosophy. New York, NY: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
12. Frazier E.F. (1957) Black Bourgeoisie. New York, NY: Free Press.
13. Fricker M. (2007) Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14. Gibson Q. (1960) The Logic of Social Enquiry. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
15. Haack S. (2020) Not one of the boys: Memoir of an academic misfit. Cosmos + Taxis 86: 92–106.
16. Homskaya E. (2001) Alexander Romanovich Luria: A Scientific Biography. New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
17. Merton R. ([1957] 1968) Social Theory and Social Structure. New York, NY: The Free Press, pp.1–38.
18. Merton R. (1941) Review of Contemporary Social Theory by Harry Elmer Barnes, Howard Becker, and Frances Bennett Becker. American Sociological Review. No. 6(2): 282–286.
19. Merton R. (1968) The Matthew effect in science: The reward and communication systems of science are considered. Science. No.159 (3810): 56–63.
20. Merton R. (1972) Insiders and outsiders: A chapter in the sociology of knowledge. American Journal of Sociology. No. 77(July): 9–47.
21. Mills C.W. (ed.) (1960) Images of Man: The Classical Tradition in Sociological Thinking. New York, NY: George Braziller.
22. Morris A. (2015) The Scholar Denied: W. E. B. Du Bois and the Birth of Modern Sociology. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
23. Origgi G. (2015) Reputation: What It is and Why It Matters (trans. Holmes S and Arikha N). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
24. Orwell G. (1949) Nineteen Eighty-Four: A Novel. London: Secker & Warburg.
25. Parsons T. (1937) Structure of Social Action. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
26. Parsons T., Shils E., Naegele K.D. et al. (eds) (1961) Theories of Society: Foundations of Modern Sociological Theory. New York, NY: The Free Press of Glencoe, Inc.
27. Sabine G.H. (1937) A History of Political Theory. New York, NY: Henry Holt and Company.
28. Shils E. (1975) Center and Periphery: Essays in Macrosociology. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
29. Sivertsen S.S. (2019) On the practical impossibility of being both well-informed and impartial. Erasmus. Journal for Philosophy and Economics. No.12(1): 52–72.
30. Thilly F., Wood L. ([1914] 1957) A History of Philosophy, 3rd edn. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.