Perceptions of Inequality as a Factor of Investments in Human Capital (an empirical analysis)

 
PIIS013216250024234-0-1
DOI10.31857/S013216250024234-0
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: Senior Researcher
Affiliation:
Institute of Sociology of FCTAS RAS
Institute for Social Policy of the National Research University “Higher School of Economics”
Address: Moscow, Russia
Occupation: Head of the Center for Stratification Research, National Research University Higher School of Economics; Leading Researcher, Institute of Sociology of FCTAS RAS
Affiliation:
National Research University Higher School of Economics
Institute of Sociology of FCTAS RAS
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Occupation: Senior research associate
Affiliation: Institute of Sociology Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Address: Krzhizhanovskogo Street, 24/35, korpus 5, 117218, Moscow, Russia
Journal nameSotsiologicheskie issledovaniya
EditionIssue 6
Pages29-41
Abstract

The article presents the results of the empirical analysis of the relationship between the Russians' perceptions of inequality and their behavior in relation to investments in human capital. Empirical analysis of such a relation is based on the RLMS HSE data. The investments in human capital are operationalized by the expenditures for adult education, and the perceptions of inequality are measured by the subjective degree of fairness of access to higher education, and also by subjective factors of poverty and well-being that population finds most important in contemporary Russian society. The results of the analysis demonstrate that perceptions of inequality held among the population affect their behavior in relation to the adult’s human capital. The population's perception of access to higher education as fair, and the reasons for wealth as meritocratic, leads to a greater propensity to invest in the adults’ human capital. The perception of the causes of wealth as related to the specific parental family support or the institutional environment, which does not meet the principles of equality of opportunity, on the contrary, has a disincentive effect on investment in adult Russians human capital; understanding poverty as a consequence of the current institutional environment specifics in the country works in a similar way. The obtained results demonstrate another consequence of the population's perception of inequality as non-meritocratic (quite typical for Russians in general), affecting the range of possibilities for the implementation of Russia's development vector based on human capital as its driver.

Keywordsinvestment in human capital, subjective perception of inequality, inequality factors
AcknowledgmentThe article was prepared in the framework of a research grant funded by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (grant ID: 075–15–2022–325).
Received03.07.2023
Publication date12.07.2023
Number of characters30784
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 252

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Arora A., Florida R., Gates G.J., Kamlet M. (2000) Human capital, quality of place, and location. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnagie Mellon University.

2. Bak H., Yi Y. (2020) When the American dream fails: The effect of perceived economic inequality on present‐oriented behavior. Psychology & Marketing. Vol. 37. No. 10: 1321–1341.

3. Becker G. (1993) Nobel lecture: The economic way of looking at behavior. Journal of Political Economy. Vol. 101. No. 3: 385–409.

4. Bourdieu P., Passeron J.C. (1990) Reproduction in education, society and culture. London: Sage.

5. Coleman M., DeLeire T. (2003) An Economic Model of Locus of Control and the Human Capital Investment Decision. Journal of Human Resources. Vol. 38. No. 3: 701–721.

6. Fraumeni, B.M., He J., Li H., Liu, Q. (2019) Regional distribution and dynamics of human capital in China 1985–2014. Journal of Comparative Economics. Vol. 47 No. 4: 853–866.

7. Galor O., Zeira J. (1993) Income distribution and macroeconomics. The review of economic studies. Vol. 60. No. 1: 35–52.

8. Gorshkov М.К. (2014) Social inequalities as an object of sociological analysis. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 7: 20–31. (In Russ.)

9. Johnston D.W., Schurer S., Shields M. A. (2014) Maternal gender role attitudes, human capital investment, and labour supply of sons and daughters. Oxford Economic Papers. Vol. 66. No. 3: 631–659.

10. Karavay A. (2016) Human capital of Russian hereditary workers. Monitoring obshhestvennogo mnenija: jekonomicheskie i social'nye peremeny [Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes Journal (Public Opinion Monitoring)]. No. 6 (136): 107–124. (In Russ.)

11. Karavay A. (2021) Institutional Barriers to The Growth of Human Capital of Highly-Skilled Professionals. Zhurnal institucional'nyh issledovanij [Journal of Institutional Studies]. Vol. 13. No. 3: 131–143. (In Russ.).

12. Kosova L. (2016) What Kind of Society We Live in? Analysis of Factors Determining Mass Choice in Case of Social Structures Perception. Vestnik obshhestvennogo mnenija. Dannye. Analiz. Diskussii [The Russian Public Opinion Herald. Data. Analysis. Discussions]. Vol. 123. No. 3–4: 43–52. (In. Russ.)

13. Kozyreva P., Smirnov A. (2022) The Evolution of Russian People’s Social Wellbeing During the Post-Soviet Era: from Collapse to Contrasting Stability (1994–2021). Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 12: 29–41. (In. Russ.)

14. Lim S.S., Updike R.L., Kaldjian A.S. et al. (2018) Measuring human capital: a systematic analysis of 195 countries and territories, 1990–2016. The Lancet. Vol. 392. No. 10154: 1217–1234.

15. Loveless M. (2013) The Deterioration of Democratic Political Culture: Consequences of the Perception of Inequality. Social Justice research. Vol. 26. No. 4: 471–491.

16. Mareeva S. (2021) Middle-Class Perceptions of Inequality Compared to Other Russians: Consensus or Disagreement? Sociologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. Vol. 47. No. 1: 38–49. (In Russ.)

17. Mareeva S., Slobodenyuk E., Anikin V. (2022) Public Tolerance for Social Inequalities in Turbulent Russia: Reassessing the Role of Subjective Mobility? Monitoring obshhestvennogo mnenija: jekonomicheskie i social'nye peremeny [Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes Journal (Public Opinion Monitoring)]. No.1: 39–60. (In Russ.)

18. Mejía D., St-Pierre M. (2008) Unequal opportunities and human capital formation. Journal of Development Economics. Vol. 86. No. 2: 395–413.

19. Mincer J. (1962) On-the-job training: Costs, returns and some implications. The Journal of Political Economy. Vol.70. No. 5: 50–79.

20. Örkény A., Székelyi M. (2000) Views on social inequality and the role of the state: Posttransformation trends in Eastern and Central Europe. Social Justice Research. Vol. 13. No. 2: 199–218.

21. Philippis M., Rossi F. (2021) Parents, schools and human capital differences across countries. Journal of the European Economic Association. Vol. 19. No. 2: 1364–1406.

22. Sprong S. et al. (2019) «Our country needs a strong leader right now»: Economic inequality enhances the wish for a strong leader. Psychological science. Vol. 30. No. 11: 1625–1637.

23. Tikhonova N. (2018) Subjective stratification of Russian society model and its dynamic Vestnik obshhestvennogo mnenija. Dannye. Analiz. Diskussii [The Russian Public Opinion Herald. Data. Analysis. Discussions]. Vol. 126. No. 1–2: 17–29. (In Russ.)

24. Young M. (1958) The rise of the meritocracy 1870-2033: an essay on education and society. London: Thames and Hudson.

25. Vella F. (1994) Gender Roles and Human Capital Investment: The Relationship between Traditional Attitudes and Female Labour Market Performance. Economica. Vol. 61: 191–211.

26. Volchik V., Zotova T. (2011) Adaptive rationality and economic behavior in an evolutionary context. TERRA ECONOMICUS. Vol. 9. No. 4: 54–64. (In Russ.)

27. Wilkinson R., Pickett K. (2009) The spirit level: Why More Equal Societies Almost Always Do Better. Bloomsbury Press.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up