Favoritism in Russian Organizations: Antecedents and Consequences

The paper analyzes the phenomenon of managerial favoritism defined as managers’ preferences for some of their subordinates, giving them the most favorable treatment at the expense of others. The study is based on two surveys of 1,116 managers and 364 employees. We reveal that the presence of favoritism is positively related to “clannish” type of social organization, with “closed” social network channels of hiring and employee socio-economic dependency from their managers. In organizations with favoritism, the importance of personal sympathies and subjective evaluations of managers is high, and a successful career requires compliance, discipline, and personal loyalty. In contrast, companies without favoritism are characterized by meritocratic type of social organization. They have open hiring channels, performance-based rewards and promotions, and a focus on continually updating the employees’ skills. Employees who reported favoritism in their organizations had lower job satisfaction, higher levels of role uncertainty, stress, and intentions to leave. Conversely, the most satisfied, engaged, and happy are those respondents who reported close and trusting relationships with their supervisors and at the same time an equal, not “exclusive”, treatment of all subordinates by supervisors.

Keywords

favoritism, in-group, out-group, leader-member exchange, social organization, meritocracy, as-cription, achieving, clan system, power in organization

Received

16.03.2023

Publication date

28.03.2023

Number of characters

41130

Cite

GOST	Balabanova E., Favoritism in Russian Organizations: Antecedents and Consequences // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya – 2023. – Issue 2 C. 16-27 [Electronic resource]. URL: http://ras.jes.su/socis/s013216250022843-0-1-en (circulation date: 12.05.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S013216250022843-0
MLA	Balabanova, Evgeniya, , "Favoritism in Russian Organizations: Antecedents and Consequences." Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya 2 (2023):16-27. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250022843-0
APA	Balabanova E., (2023). Favoritism in Russian Organizations: Antecedents and Consequences. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya (2), pp.16-27 DOI: 10.31857/S013216250022843-0

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 1, views: 320

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Balabanova E.S. Kontseptsiya meritokratizma v sovremennykh issledovaniyakh organizatsij // Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsial'noj antropologii. 2016. T. XIX. № 2 (85). S. 60–73. [Balabanova E.S. (2016) The Concept of Meritocracy in Contemporary Organizational Studies. Zhurnal sociologii i social’noj antropologii [The Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology]. Vol. XIX. No. (85): 60–73. (In Russ.)]

2. Balabanova E.S. Organizatsionnoe povedenie. M.: INFRA-M, 2022. [Balabanova E. S. (2022) Organizational Behavior. Moscow: INFRA-M. DOI 10.12737/1048688. (In Russ.)]

3. Paramonova S.P. Sotsiologiya favoritizma. Perm': PNIUPTU, 2018. [Paramonova S.P. (2018) Sociology of Favoritism. Perm: PNIUPTU. (In Russ.)]

4. Florovskij S.Yu. Organizatsionnoe razvitie i sovmestnaya upravlencheskaya deyatel'nost' rukovoditelej: tekhnologiya lichnostno-regulyatornoj prediktsii // Psikhologiya upravleniya v sovremennoj Rossii: protsessy truda i organizatsii: mat. Mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. Tver': TGU, 2012. S. 46–51. [Florovskiy S.Yu. (2012) Organizational development and joint managerial activities of managers: the technology of personality-regulatory prediction. Psychology of Management in Modern Russia: Labor and Organizational Processes: conference proceedings. Tver: TGU: 46–51. (In Russ.)]

5. Florovskij S.Yu. Tsennostno-orientatsionnaya regulyatsiya sovmestnoj upravlencheskoj deyatel'nosti: organizatsionno-kontekstnaya variativnost'-stabil'nost' // Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta. Ser.: Filosofiya. Psikhologiya. Pedagogika. 2018. T. 28. № 2. S. 228–238. [Florovskiy S.Yu. (2018) Value-oriented regulation of joint managerial activities: organization-contextual variability and stability. Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Psihologiya. Pedagogika [Bulletin of Udmurt University. Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy]. Vol. 28. No. 2: 228–238. (In Russ.)]

6. Castilla E.J., Benard S. (2010) The Paradox of Meritocracy in Organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly. Vol. 55. No. 4: 543–676.

7. Farr-Wharton R., Brunetto Y., Shacklock K. (2011) Professionals’ supervisor-subordinate relationships, autonomy and commitment in Australia: a leader-member exchange theory perspective. International Journal of Human Resource Management. Vol. 22. No. 17: 3496–3512.

8. Graen G.B., Uhl-Bien M. (1995) Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. Leadership Quarterly. Vol. 6. No. 2: 219–247.

9. Hofstede G. (1986) Cultural differences in teaching and learning. International Journal of Intercultural Relations. Vol. 10. No. 3: 301–320.

10. Hotho J., Minbaeva D., Muratbekova-Touron M., Rabbiosi L. (2020) Coping with favoritism in recruitment and selection: a communal perspective. Journal of Business Ethics. Vol. 165. No. 1: 659–679.

11. Hudson M., Netto G., Noon M., Sosenko F., De Lima P., Kamenou-Aigbekaen N. (2017) Ethnicity and low wage traps: favouritism, homosocial reproduction and economic marginalization. Work, Employment and Society. Vol. 31. No. 6: 992–1009.

12. Palermo O.A., Carnaz A.C., Duarte H. (2019) Favouritism: Exploring the ‘uncontrolled’ spaces of the leadership experience. Leadership. Vol. 15. No. 3: 381–397.

13. Pearce J.L. (2015) Cronyism and nepotism are bad for everyone: The research evidence. Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Vol. 8. No. 1: 41–44.

14. Petersen T., Saporta I., Seidel M.D.L. (2000) Offering a job: Meritocracy and social networks. American Journal of Sociology. Vol. 106. No. 3: 763–816.

15. Prendergast C.J., Topel R. (1996) Favoritism in organizations. Journal of Political Economy. Vol. 104. No. 5: 958–978.

16. Rivera M.T., Soderstrom S.B., Uzzi B. (2010) Dynamics of Dyads in Social Networks: Assortative, Relational, and Proximity Mechanisms. Annual Review of Sociology. Vol. 36: 91–115.