Older People And The Pandemic: Social Exclusion, Heterogeneity Of The Groups Of Seniors And Intersectionality Of Age Inequalities

 
PIIS013216250021521-6-1
DOI10.31857/S013216250021521-6
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: Associate Professor of the Department of Social Technologies
Affiliation: Southern Federal University
Address: Russian Federation, Rostov-on-Don
Journal nameSotsiologicheskie issledovaniya
EditionIssue 2
Pages115-124
Abstract

The article discusses the reactions of older Russians to the restrictions of the pandemic from the perspective of critical gerontology, sociology of space and intersectional approach based on 39 interviews collected in Russian regions in 2020-2022. In the context of the risks of coronavirus, inequalities in relation to older people and differentiation within the groups of seniors, have manifested and intensified. With considerable diversity, two typical ways in which older people respond to pandemic restrictions stand out: the first are outraged by them, the others do not notice them. The first type of reactions is demonstrated by people who maintained high physical mobility, social activity and involvement. With the advent of the pandemic, they experienced fear and indignation, they perceived the lockdown and self-isolation as a restriction of freedom. They tend to evaluate external assistance as annoying overprotectiveness, they are often ready to act as a subject, and not just an object of care. The second type of reactions is typical for people with limited mobility who are in contact with a narrow circle of people and social spaces, relying on external help from the family, helping professionals. They did not notice the limitations of the pandemic, nothing has changed in their lives. They accept self-isolation, social exclusion and external care as the norm. Active and mobile older people are “outraged” by the manifestations of objectification and exclusion (“murmuring”), those living in social isolation are ready for self-stigmatization, accepting exclusion as the norm (“resigned”). The ability to detect inequalities and resist them directly correlates with social inclusion, and exclusion reduces “sensitivity” to manifestations of structural inequalities. Self-stigmatization is indirectly supported by the normative dependence and low mobility of older people in the discourse of professional care. Age discrimination intersects with the normativity of social exclusion of immobile people, equating old age with disability, and is justified by the priority right to care. This actualizes the role of inclusive and intersectional approaches in the sociology of aging, social policy and practice.

Keywordsolder people, groups of seniors, restrictions, mobility, social exclusion, structural inequality, age inequality, intersectionality
AcknowledgmentThe research was carried out at the expense of the grant of the RSF, project No. 23-28-00134 “Social participation of older people in Russian regions in the post-pandemic period” at Southern Federal University
Received17.03.2023
Publication date28.03.2023
Number of characters26078
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 393

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Burd'e P. Sotsiologiya sotsial'nogo prostranstva. Perevod s frantsuzskogo N.A. Shmatko. 2007. SPb.: Aletejya. [Bourdieu P. (2007) Sociology of Social Space. Trans. from the French by N.A. Shmatko. St. Petersburg: Aleteya. (In Russ.)]

2. Golubev A.G., Sidorenko A.V. Teoriya i praktika stareniya v usloviyakh pandemii COVID-19 // Uspekhi gerontologii. 2020. T. 33. № 2. S. 397–408. [Golubev A.G., Sidorenko A.V. (2020) Theory and Practice of Aging in the Conditions of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Uspekhi gerontologii [Advantages of Gerontology]. Vol. 33. No. 2: 397–408. (In Russ.)] DOI: 10.34922/AE.2020.33.2.026.

3. Evseeva Ya.V. Pozhilye lyudi vo vremya pandemii COVID-19 // Sotsial'nye i gumanitarnye nauki. Otechestvennaya i zarubezhnaya literatura. Ser. 11, Sotsiologiya: Referativnyj zhurnal. 2021. № 2. S. 75–93. [Evseeva Ya.V. (2021) Elderly People During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Social'nye i gumanitarnye nauki. Otechestvennaya i zarubezhnaya literatura. Ser. 11, Sociologiya: Referativnyj zhurnal [Social Sciences and Humanities. Domestic and Foreign Literature. Ser. 11, Sociology: Abstract Journal]. No. 2: 75–93. (In Russ.)] DOI: 10.31249/rsoc/2021.02.07.

4. Kienko T.S., Pevnaya M.V., Ptitsyna N.A. Praktiki samoorganizatsii i sotsial'noj aktivnosti rossiyan starshego vozrasta kak rasshiryayuschie vozmozhnosti ("empowerment") tekhnologii // Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N. I. Lobachevskogo. Ser/: Sotsial'nye nauki. 2022. № 1. Vyp. 65. C. 89–98. [Kienko T.S., Pevnaya M.V., Pticyna N.A. (2022) Practices of Self-Organization and Social Activity of Older Russians as Empowering Technologies. Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N. I. Lobachevskogo. Ser.: Social'nye nauki [Bulletin of the Nizhny Novgorod University named after N. I. Lobachevsky. Ser.: Social Sciences]. Iss. 65. No. 1: 89–98. (In Russ.)] DOI: 10.52452/18115942_2022_1_89.

5. Kienko T.S., Savina E.A. Khroniki karantina i observatsii v dome-internate dlya prestarelykh i invalidov // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2021. № 2. S. 103–111. [Kienko T.S., Savina E.A. (2021) Chronicles of Quarantine and Surveillance in a Russian Residential Home for the Elderly and Disabled in the COVID-19 Syndemic. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 2: 103–111. (In Russ.)] DOI: 10.31857/S013216250012513-7.

6. Parfenova O.A., Petukhova I.S. Vliyanie pandemii COVID-19 na zhizn' starshego pokoleniya v gorodskom i sel'skom kontekstakh // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2022. № 5. S. 71–80. [Parfenova O.A., Petukhova I.S. (2022) The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Life of the Older Generation in Urban and Rural Contexts. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 5: 71–80. (In Russ.)] DOI: 10.31857/S013216250018704-7.

7. Armitage R., Nellums L.B. (2020) COVID-19 and the Consequences of Isolating the Elderly. The Lancet Public Health. Vol. 5. No. 5: e256. DOI: 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30061-X.

8. Ayalon L., Chasteen A., Diehl M. et al. (2021) Aging in Times of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Avoiding Ageism and Fostering Intergenerational Solidarity. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B. Vol. 76. No. 2: e49–e52. DOI: 10.1093/geronb/gbaa051.

9. Birditt K.S., Turkelson A., Fingerman K.L. et al. (2021) Age Differences in Stress, Life Changes, and Social Ties During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Implications for Psychological Well-being. The Gerontologist. Vol. 61. No. 2: 205–216. DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnaa204.

10. Browne C. (1995) Empowerment in Social Work Practice with Older Women. Social Work. Vol. 40. No. 3: 358–364.

11. Bruine de Bruin W. (2021) Age Differences in COVID-19 Risk Perceptions and Mental Health: Evidence from a National US Survey Conducted in March 2020. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B. Vol. 76. No. 2: e24–e29. DOI: 10.1093/geronb/gbaa074.

12. Buffel T., Yarker S., Phillipson C. et al. (2021) Locked Down by Inequality: Older People and the COVID-19 Pandemic. Urban Studies. Article No. 004209802110410: 1–18. DOI: 10.1177/00420980211041018.

13. Calasanti T. (2016) Combating Ageism: How Successful Is Successful Aging? The Gerontologist. Vol. 56. No. 6: 1093–1101. DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnv076.

14. Cohn-Schwartz E., Ayalon L. (2021) Societal Views of Older Adults as Vulnerable and a Burden to Society During the COVID-19 Outbreak: Results from an Israeli Nationally Representative Sample. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B. Vol. 76. No. 7: e313–e317. DOI: 10.1093/geronb/gbaa150/5901136.

15. Colenda C.C., Reynolds C.F., Applegate W.B. et al. (2020) COVID-19 Pandemic and Ageism: A Call for Humanitarian Care. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry. Vol. 28. No. 8: 805–807. DOI: 10.1016/j.jagp.2020.04.005.

16. Corbin J., Strauss A. (1990) Grounded Theory Research: Procedures, Canons, and Evaluative. Criteria Qualitative Sociology. Vol. 13. No. 1: 3–21. DOI: 10.1007/BF00988593.

17. Dannefer D. (2003) Cumulative Advantage/Disadvantage and the Life Course: Cross-Fertilizing Age and Social Science Theory. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B. Vol. 58. No. 6: S327–S337. DOI: 10.1093/geronb/58.6.

18. Ferrer I., Grenier A., Brotman S., Koehn S. (2017) Understanding The Experiences of Racialized Older People through an Intersectional Life Course Perspective. Journal of Aging Studies. Vol. 41: 10–17. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaging.2017.02.001.

19. Glaser B., Strauss A. (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Reprinted 2006: New Brunswick and London: Aldine Transaction.

20. Gutterman A. (2022) Ageism and Intersectionality: Older Persons as Members of Other Vulnerable Groups (February 22, 2022). In: Older Persons' Rights Project. Oakland CA. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3972842.

21. Holman D., Walker A. (2021) Understanding unequal ageing: towards a synthesis of intersectionality and life course analyses. European Journal of Ageing. Vol. 18. No. 2: 239–255. DOI: 10.1007/s10433-020-00582-7.

22. Khunti K., Singh A.K., Pareek M., Hanif W. (2020) Is Ethnicity Linked to Incidence or Outcomes of COVID-19? British Medical Journal. No. 369. Article No. m1548: 1-2. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.m1548.

23. Knepple Carney A., Graf A.S., Hudson G., Wilson E. (2020) Age Moderates Perceived COVID-19 Disruption on Well-Being. The Gerontologist. Vol. 61. No. 1: 30–35. DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnaa106.

24. Lloyd-Sherlock P., Ebrahim S., Geffen L., McKee M. (2020). Bearing the Brunt of COVID-19: Older People in Low and Middle Income Countries. British Medical Journal. No. 368. Article No. m1052: 1–2. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.m1052.

25. Nash P., Taylor T., Levy B. (2020) The Intersectionality of Ageism. Innovation in Aging. Vol. 4. Iss. Suppl. 1: 846–847. DOI: 10.1093/geroni/igaa057.3105.

26. Pentaris P., Willis P., Ray M. et al. (2020) Older People in the Context of COVID-19: A European Perspective. Journal of Gerontological Social Work. Vol. 63. No. 8: 736–742. DOI: 10.1080/01634372.2020.1821143.

27. Phillipson C., Yarker S., Lang L. et al. (2021) COVID-19, Inequality and Older People: Developing Community-Centred Interventions. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. Vol. 18. No. 15. Article No. 8064: 1–14. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18158064.

28. Pit S., Fisk M., Freihaut W. et al. (2021) COVID-19 and the Ageing Workforce: Global Perspectives on Needs and Solutions Across 15 Countries. International Journal for Equity in Health. Vol. 20. No. 1. Article No. 221: 2–22. DOI: 10.1186/s12939-021-01552-w.

29. Plagg B., Engl A., Piccoliori G., Eisendle K. (2020) Prolonged Social Isolation of the Elderly During COVID-19: Between Benefit and Damage. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics. Vol. 89. Article No. 104086: 1–2. DOI: 10.1016/j.archger.2020.104086.

30. Richter A.S. (2020) Altern aus Intersektionaler Perspektive: Vorschläge zu Einer Mehrdimensionalen Konzeptualisierung Intersektionaler Alternsforschung. Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie. Vol. 53. No. 3: 205–210. DOI: 10.1007/s00391-020-01689-3. (In Germ.)

31. Riley M., Johnson M., Foner A. (eds.) (1972) Aging and Society. A Sociology of Age Stratification. Vol. 3. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

32. Urry J. (2007) Mobilities. Polity: Cambridge – Malden.

33. Vervaecke D., Meisner B.A. (2021) Caremongering and Assumptions of Need: The Spread of Compassionate Ageism During COVID-19. The Gerontologist. Vol. 61/ No. 2: 159–165. DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnaa131.

34. Stat'ya postupila: 08.08.22. Final'naya versiya: 27.11.22. Prinyata k publikatsii: 16.01.23.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up