Capitalism, Post-Capitalism and the Creative Revolution (critical reflections on the article by D.A. Davydov)

 
PIIS013216250021070-0-1
DOI10.31857/S013216250021070-0
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: Professor at Department of Political Economy of Faculty of Economics, Director of Center for Modern Marxist Studies at Faculty of Philosophy
Affiliation: Lomonosov Moscow State University
Address: 27/4, Lomonosovsky av., GSP-1, Moscow, 119991, Russian Federation;
Occupation: head of laboratory
Affiliation: Lomonosov Moscow State University
Address: Russian Federation
Journal nameSotsiologicheskie issledovaniya
EditionIssue 9
Pages100-109
Abstract

The article analyzes the contradictions of the genesis of post-capitalist social relations and the resulting values and motives of activity. It is shown that such relations and values arise objectively but develop mainly in forms subordinated to the total market of simulacra and global corporate capital, which determine the dominance of the perverse forms of germs of post-capitalism. The article provides a constructive criticism of the theses of D.A. Davydov. In particular, it is shown that prestige and self-realization, assessed by the number of subscribers or likes, etc., are perverse forms that are formed through social networks and Internet resources in the conditions of their subordination to the manipulative influence of corporate capital.

The conclusion is substantiated that the real foundations of the genesis of post-capitalist relations are the progress of labor that is creative in its content and the relations arising on this basis, including: 1) the relations of creating unlimited public goods that have the form of ownership of everything by everyone; 2) relations of development of the individual in labor, acquiring the status of a need; 3) the relationship of co-creation. Additionally, the conclusion is argued that these relations, contradictory, but steadily developing over the past decades, form the basis of real post-capitalist trends, while the ones studied by D.A. Davydov perverse forms that are indeed generated by late capitalism lead to the strengthening of market-capitalist principles, and not to the genesis of a qualitatively new society and person.

Keywordscreativity, capitalism, post-capitalism, personality, alienation, intellectual private property, the ownership by everybody of everything
AcknowledgmentThis article was prepared with the support of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research and the CASS, project number 21-511-93006, and within the framework of the activities of the MSU Scientific-Educational School “Preservation of World Cultural-Historical Heritage”.
Received28.09.2022
Publication date29.09.2022
Number of characters26807
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 6, views: 693

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Batishchev G.S. (1997) Introduction to the dialectic of creativity. St. Petersburg: RHGI. (In Russ.)

2. Baudrillard J. (1994) Simulacra and simulation. University of Michigan press.

3. Bell D. (1973) The coming of post-industrial society: A venture of social forecasting. New York: Basic Books.

4. Bibler V.S. (1991) From science to the logic of culture. Two philosophical introductions to the twenty-first century. Moscow: Polit. lit-ra. (In Russ.)

5. Bulavka-Buzgalina L.A. (2021) Culture as a Market: “Inspiration Is Not for Sale”? Voprosy filosofii [Questions of Philosophy]. No. 3: 5–17. (In Russ.)

6. Buzgalin A.V. (2018) Late capitalism and its limits: dialectics of productive forces and production relations (to the 200th birth anniversary of Karl Marx). Voprosy politicheskoy ekonomii [Problems in Political Economy]. No. 2: 10–38. (In Russ.)

7. Buzgalin A.V., Kolganov A.I. (2019) Global capital. In 2 vols. Vol. 1. Methodology: Beyond Positivism, Postmodernism and Economic Imperialism (Marx re-loaded). 5th ed. Moscow: LENAND. (In Russ.)

8. Buzgalin A.V., Kolganov A.I. (2019b) Social Structure Transformation of Late Capitalism: from Proletariat and Bourgeoisie Towards Precariat and Creative Class? Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 1: 18–28. (In Russ.)

9. Davydov D.A. (2021a) The Value Foundations of Post-Capitalism: from the “Mode of Possession” to the Individualism of Self-Actualizing Personalities? Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 12: 78–90. (In Russ.)

10. Davydov D.A. (2021b) Post-Capitalism and the Birth of the Personaliat. Moscow: Ripol-Klassik. (In Russ.)

11. Davydov D.A. (2022) Class Domination in the Era of Post-Capitalism: Part 1. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 12: 142–152. (In Russ.)

12. Drucker P. (2012) Post-capitalist society. Routledge.

13. Florida R. (2002) The Rise of the Creative Class: And How It's Transforming Work, Leisure and Everyday Life. New York: Basic Books.

14. Florida R. (2005) The Flight of the Creative Class. The New Global Competition for Talent. New York: Harper Business, HarperCollins.

15. Freeman A. (2016) The twilight of the machineocratic approach: indispensable labor and the future of manufacturing. Voprosy politicheskoy ekonomii [Problems in Political Economy]. Vol. 2. No. 4: 37–60. (In Russ.)

16. Galbraith J.K. (2007 [1967]) The New Industrial State. Princeton University Press.

17. Ilyenkov E.V. (1991) Philosophy and culture. Мoscow: Politizdat. (In Russ.)

18. Inozemtsev V.L. (1998) Outside the economic society. Post-industrial theories and posteconomic trends in the modern world. Moscow:"Асademia", Nauka. (In Russ.)

19. Mamardashvili M. (2017). Converted forms. On the need for irrational expressions. Stasis. Vol. 5. No. 2. (In Russ.)

20. Marx K. (1962) Capital. Criticism of political economy. Volume Three (Book III: The process of capitalist production, taken as a whole). In; Marx K., Engels F. Works. 2nd ed. Moscow: Politizdat. Vol. 25. Part II. (In Russ.)

21. Sorokin P.A. (1992) Human. Civilization. Society. Moscow: Politizdat. (In Russ.)

22. Toffler A. (1980) The third wave. New York: Morrow.

23. Tsagolov G.N. (2015) Political economy of the future. Voprosy Politicheskoy Ekonomii [Problems in Political Economy]. No. 2: 39–51. (In Russ.)

24. Yakovleva N.G. (2018) Education in Russia: public good or commercial service? Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 3: 149–153. (In Russ.)

25. Yakovleva N.G. (2021) The transformation of education in the economy of post-Soviet Russia: the connection between digitisation and marketisation. Voprosy politicheskoy ekonomii [Problems in Political Economy]. No. 2: 146–157. (In Russ.)

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up