Some Characteristics of Employment in Rural Areas

 
PIIS013216250017247-4-1
DOI10.31857/S013216250017247-4
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: associate professor
Affiliation: Russian State University for the Humanities
Address: Russian Federation
Journal nameSotsiologicheskie issledovaniya
EditionIssue 8
Pages152-156
Abstract

The results of a secondary analysis of representative All-Russian precarity studies (2018 and 2020) data characterizing employment conditions in rural areas are presented. Changes in material well-being, labor relations and social guarantees indicators in connection with restrictive measures in 2020 are discussed. Conclusions are drawn about the decline in the quality of labor resources in Russia's rural areas, underutilization and precarization of labor, as well as insufficient "safety cushion" for rural residents due to weak social security, lack of financial savings, instability in labor relations manifested during the pandemic.

Keywordslabor resources, employment, precarity, rural and remote areas, COVID-19 pandemic
Received24.10.2021
Publication date26.09.2022
Number of characters11207
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 329

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Family household in the living space of a modern village. (2020) Saratov: Saratovskii istochnik. (In Russ.)

2. Toshchenko J.T. (ed.) (2016) Meanings of Rural Life (Experience of Sociological Analysis). Moscow: TsSP I M. (In Russ.)

3. Toshchenko Zh.T. (2018) The life world of country people: vectors of changes. In: Twenty-five years of social transformations in the assessments and judgments of Russians. Moscow, Ves’ Mir: 269–302 (In Russ.)

Table 5. Relation to pandemic events, % by column (Таблица_5.docx, 16 Kb) [Download]

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up