Ontological Problematics in Sociological Interpretation: To the Question Statement

Occupation: Head of Sociology of Education and Science Department; Prof., Department of Philosophy, Sociology, Political Science named after G.S. Arefieva
Affiliation:
Institute of Sociology of FCTAS RAS
National Research University "Moscow Power Engineering Institute"
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow

Journal name

Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya

Edition

Issue 1

Pages

5-16

Abstract

Is the ontological issue recognized in contemporary sociology? If it is denied and left "at the mercy" of social philosophers, then this state of affairs provides a serious argument for positivists and supporters of the "unscientific" sociology. At the same time, at best, sociology lowers its status to descriptive-phenomenological, extra-scientific and, possibly, everyday (ordinary) knowledge. In the worst case, we will talk about specialized techniques and technologies that are used for their specific purposes by pollsters, market experts and political strategists. If the problem of ontology is interpreted as the recognition of the special and independent existence of the studied reality, then the question of the relationship between epistemology and relativistic (multiple) ontology comes to the fore. At the same time, the reality becomes independent of the researcher and is represented by the aggregate consensus (professional) discourse in which the sociologist is “immersed”. Thus, sociology confirms the status of modern scientific knowledge about society and about social processes in it. The article shows that in theoretical sociology, ontological problems necessarily smoothly pass into epistemology, and begin to "dissolve" in value-historical coordinate systems. For its part, epistemology constructs a new reality that acquires ontological foundations. In the mutual transitions of epistemology and ontology, a blurred border of “inhuman factuality” arises (P. Berger, Т. Luckmann). A hypothesis is formulated that within these continuous transitions a variety of linguistic realities actively interact among multiple phenomena of everyday life and the diversity of scientific – specialized (professional) sociological discourses.

Keywords

sociology, science, ontology, epistemology, social cognition, social sciences

Received

18.01.2022

Publication date

27.01.2022

Number of characters

31384

Cite

GOST	Klucharev G. Ontological Problematics in Sociological Interpretation: To the Question Statement // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya – 2022. – Issue 1 C. 5-16 [Electronic resource]. URL: http://ras.jes.su/socis/s013216250017230-6-1-en (circulation date: 27.07.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S013216250017230-6
MLA	Klucharev, Grigoriy A. "Ontological Problematics in Sociological Interpretation: To the Question Statement." Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya 1 (2022):5-16. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250017230-6
APA	Klucharev G. (2022). Ontological Problematics in Sociological Interpretation: To the Question Statement. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya (1), pp.5-16 DOI: 10.31857/S013216250017230-6

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 728

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Alexander J. (2004) General Theory in a State of Postpositivism: The "Epistemological Dilemma" and the Search for the Present Mind. Sociologiya: mеtodologiya, metody, matematichsheskoye modelirovaniye [Sociology: Methodology, Methods, Mathematical Modeling]. 2004. No. 19: 167–204. (In Russ.)

2. Alexander J. (2013) The Meanings of Social Life: Cultural Sociology. Transl. from Eng. by G.К. Оl’khovikov. Ed. by D.Yu. Kurakin. Мoscow: Praksis. (In Russ.).

3. Antwi S.K., Hamza K. (2015) Qualitative and Quantitative Research Paradigms in Business Research: A Philosophical Reflection. European Journal of Business and Management. Vol. 7. No. 3: 217–226.

4. Balakirev А.А., Semenova E.R. (2018) Criteria of Scientific Knowledge. Ural'skiy nauchnyy vestnik [Ural Scientific Bulletin]. Vol. 7. No. 1: 30–32. (In Russ.)

5. Berger P., Luckmann T. (1996) The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. London; New York: Penguin Books.

6. Certeau M. (2011) The Practice of Everyday Life. Berkley: University of California Press.

7. Dоktоrоv B.Z., Kozlova L.A. (2021) Biographical Analysis in Historical-Sociological Research: Summing up 20 Years of Experience. Interview prepared by Kozlova L.A. Sotsiologitcheskiy zhurnal [Sociological Journal]. 2021. Vol. 27. No. 2: 126–145. DOI: 10.19181/socjour.2021.27.2.8090. (In Russ.)

8. Ighnatov О.D. (2006) Ontology and Epistemology of Ontology in the Philosophy of Science by W. Quine. Мoscow: MGU. (In Russ.)

9. Il’yasov F.N. (2014) Scales and Specific Sociological Measurement. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya [Monitoring of Public Opinion]. No. 1: 3–16. (In Russ.)

10. Kalinnikov L.А. (1990) Categories and Predicates: Kant and Modernity. Kaliningrad: BFU im. I. Kanta. Kant Collection No. 1: 11–26. (In Russ.)

11. Kamal S.S.L.A. (2019) Research Paradigm and the Philosophical Foundations of a Qualitative Study People. International Journal of Social Sciences. Vol. 4. No. 3: 1386–1394. DOI: 10.20319/pijss.2019.43.13861394.

12. Kasavin I.Т., Chevelev S.P. (2004) Analysis of Everyday Life. Мoscow: КАNОN+. (In Russ.)

13. Khan S.N. (2014) Qualitative Research Method Phenomenology. Asian Social Science. Vol. 10. No. 21: 298. DOI: 10.5539/ass.v10n21p298.

14. Koptelov А.О. (2008) Grimaces of Empiriocriticism in the Mirror of Lenin's Theory of Reflection. Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University]. No. 11: 165–176. (In Russ.)

15. Koselleck R. (2002) The Practice of Conceptual History: Timing, History, Spacing Concepts. Stanford: Stanford Univ. Press.

16. Koselleck R. (2006) Social History and the History of Concepts. In: Historical Concepts and Political Ideas in Russia of the 16th – 20th Centuries. Iss. 5. St. Petersburg: Aletheia: 33–53. (In Russ.)

17. Lektorskiy V.А. (1980) Subject. Object. Cognition. Мoscow: Nauka. (In Russ.)

18. Lektorskiy V.А. (2001) Epistemology Classical and Non-classical. Мoscow: Editorial URSS. (In Russ.)

19. Lektorskiy V.А. et al. (eds) (2018) Contemporary Tendencies of Epistemology's Development (Round Table Discussion). Voprosy Filosofii. No. 10: 31–66. DOI: 10.31857/S004287440001151-1. (In Russ.)

20. Magomeodv N.G., Каchabekov А.G. (2003) Criteria for the Scientific Nature of Social Knowledge. Makhachkala: Narody Dagestanа. (In Russ.)

21. Mikeshina L.А. (2016) Modern Epistemology of Humanitarian Knowledge: Interdisciplinary Syntheses. Moscow: Polit. encyklopedia. (In Russ.)

22. Mikeshina L.А. (2020) Problem of Values in the Sociological Science: Epistemological Analysis. Sotsiologicheskiye issledovanya [Sociological Studies]. No. 12: 44–53. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250011917-1. (In Russ.)

23. Odintsov А.V. (2018) A Case in Combining Databases of Public Opinion Research. Sotsiodinamika [Sociodynamics]. No. 1: 15–20. (In Russ.)

24. Onipko А.А. (2012) The Specifics of Social Cognition: On the Criteria of Scientific Knowledge in Sociology. Diskussiya [Discussion]. No. 7: 71–74. (In Russ.)

25. Otoo B.K. (2020) Declaring my Ontological and Epistemological Stance: A Reflective Paper. Journal of Educational Thought. University of Calgary. Vol. 53. No. 1: 67–88.

26. Pukshanskiy B.Ya. (1987) Everyday Knowledge. Leningrad: Leningradskii un-t. (In Russ.)

27. Reed I., Alexander J. (2009) Social Science as Reading and Performance. European Journal of Social Theory. Vol. 12. No. 1: 21–41. DOI: 10.1177/1368431008099648.

28. Schutz А. (2003) The Semantic Structure of the Everyday World: Essays on Phenomenological Sociology. Comp. by А.Ya. Аlkhasov; tr. from. Eng. by А.Ya. Alkhasov, N.Ya. Маzluniyanova; ed. of transl. G.S. Batyghin. Moscow: Оbshchestvennoye mneniye. (In Russ.)

29. Searl J.R. (1995) The Construction of Social Reality. New York: Free Press.

30. Semenov Е.V. (2013) Experiments with Manual Control of a Scientific and Technological Complex in post-Soviet Russia. Innovatsii. Nauka. Оbrazovaniye [Innovation. Science. Education]. No. 13: 7–32. (In Russ.)

31. Tikhonov А.V., Меrzliakov А.А., Poshchestnev А.А. (2021) The Latent Group Formation Phenomen in Regions with Different Sociocultural Modernization Levels. Sotsiologitcheskiye issledovanya [Sociological Studies]. No. 10: 139–148. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250012270-0. (In Russ.)

32. Toshchenko Zh.Т. (2019) From Phenomenon to Noumenon: а Methodological and Methodic Search. Sotsiologitcheskiye issledovanya [Sociological Studies]. No. 4: 3–14. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250004582-3. (In Russ.)

33. Tuli F. (2010) The Basis of Distinction between Qualitative and Quantitative Research in Social Science: Reflection on Ontological, Epistemological and Methodological Perspectives. Ethiopian Journal of Education and Sciences. Vol. 6. No. 1: 97–108. DOI: 10.4314/ejesc.v6i1.65384.

34. Vasiliachis de Gialdino I. (2011) Ontological and Epistemological Foundations of Qualitative Research. Qualitative Social Research. Vol. 10. No. 2. Article no. 30. DOI: 10.17169/fqs-10.2.1299.

35. Weber M. (1990) Science as a Vocation. In: Weber M. Selected Works. Moscow: Progress: 707–735. (In Russ.)