Foundations of Russians’ Value Consolidation: Traditionalism and Renewal

Publication type Article
Status Published
Affiliation: Institute of Sociology of FCTAS RAS
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Journal nameSotsiologicheskie issledovaniya
EditionIssue 9

The article presents first results of an analysis of the consolidating potential of Russians’ value orientations. The empirical basis of the study is a survey of 2000 Russian citizens in September 2020. Following conclusions were drawn in analyzing the survey data. The level of support for the idea of civilizational originality of Russia is over 70% allowing us to conclude that this value benchmark has a high consolidation potential. This idea is for a majority of Russians a marker of their identity delimiting the Russian cultural, historical and even civilizational space. Orientation towards this value marker ensures cultural identity of contemporary Russians (including the youngest) with Russians of other historical eras. At the same time, an overwhelming majority of Russians is focused on a liberal understanding of the values of civic consciousness, which indicates an almost massive rejection of the ideological imperatives of the Soviet period. The process of renewal of the value orientations in civic consciousness is characteristic not only for young people, but also for older age groups, including those respondents whose civic consciousness has been formed in the Soviet era.

Keywordsvalue orientations, value semantics, terminal values, traditionalist values, liberal values
AcknowledgmentThis article is a translation of: Кузнецов И.М. Основания ценностной кон-солидации Россиян: традиционализм и обновление // Sotsiologicheskie Issle-dovaniia. 2021. No 8: 93–102. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250014161-0
Publication date27.09.2021
Number of characters29452
Cite     Download pdf

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 627

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Aksenova O.V. (2016) Modernization or Development: Traditional Basis of the Progress in Russia. Vlast [The Authority]. Vol. 24. No. 9: 31–36. (In Russ.)

2. Bauman Z. (2008) Liquid Modernity. St. Petersburg: Piter. (In Russ.)

3. Devyatko I.F., Fomina V.N. (eds) (2010) Globalization and Social Institutions: Sociological Approach. Moscow: Nauka. (In Russ.)

4. Drobizheva L.M. (ed.) (2018) Interethnic Accord in all-Russian and Regional Dimension: Socio-cultural and Reli-gious Contexts: monogr. Moscow: FNISTs RAN. (In Russ.)

5. Giddens A. (1994) Living in a post-Traditional Society. In: Beck U., Giddens A., Lash S. (eds) Reflexive Moderniza-tion: Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order. Cambridge: Polity Press: 56–109.

6. Goffman A.B. (ed.) (2008) Traditions and Innovations in Contemporary Russia: Sociological Analysis of Interaction and Dynamics. Moscow: ROSSPEN. (In Russ.) Gorshkov M.K., Krumm R., Petukhov V.V., Byzov L.G. (2011) Twenty Years of Reforms through the Eyes of Russians: The Experience of Many Years of Sociological Meas-urements. Ed. by M.K.

7. Gorshkov, R. Krumm, V.V. Petukhov. Moscow: Ves Mir. (In Russ.)

8. Gorshkov M.K., Petukhov V.V. (eds) (2016) Russian Society and Current Challenges. (2016) Book 4. Moscow: Ves Mir. (In Russ.)

9. Inglehart R., Welzel C. (2011) Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy: The Human Development Se-quence. Moscow: Novoe izdatelstvo. (In Russ.)

10. Kuznetsov I.M. (2017) The Value Markers of Russians’ Cultural and Historical Identity. Vestnik instituta sotziologii [Bulletin of the Institute of Sociology]. Vol. 8. No. 3: 12–31. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.19181/ vis.2017.22.3.466.

11. Levada Yu.A. (ed.) (1993) Soviet Common Man: Experience of a Social Portrait at the Turn of the 90s. Moscow: Mir, Okean. (In Russ.)

12. Rokeach M. (1973) The Nature of Human Values. New York: Free Press.

Система Orphus