Methodological Issues on the Pages of the Journal “Sociological Studies” (2000–2018)

 
PIIS013216250009486-7-1
DOI10.31857/S013216250009486-7
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: Chief Researcher
Affiliation: Institute of Sociology FCTAS RAS
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Occupation: Senior Researcher
Affiliation: Institute of Sociology FCTAS RAS
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Journal nameSotsiologicheskie issledovaniya
EditionIssue 7
Pages47-56
Abstract

The article examines thematic repertoire of the journal “Sociological Studies” on the issues of empirical research methods. Analyzed papers are classified in various groups depending on the dominance of a certain instrumental, methodological context in them. According to the statistics of publications in this area for 2000–2018, we can indirectly assess the contribution of the journal to the development of methodological issues. For comparison, the statistics of publications in similar areas in the journal “Sociology: Methodology, Methods, Mathematical Modeling” for 1991–2018 is given. The authors come to the conclusion that, judging by the thematic repertoire (on methodological issues) of the publications, “Sociological Studies” represents main methodological directions and themes, based on its mission of a leading professional wide-profile journal. At the same time, in the light of recent methodological challenges and taking into account domestic realities, the need to expand this repertoire is emphasized.

Keywordsmethodological issues, directions of development, methods of empirical sociological research, methodological knowledge, methodological challenges, integration of knowledge
Received27.04.2020
Publication date01.08.2020
Number of characters26124
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 1418

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Bekarev A.M., Devyatko I.F., Zhuravlyov O.M., Oberemko O.A., Podvoyskiy D.G., Radaev V.V., Rogozin D.M., Scherbina V.V. (2018) Contemporary Russian Sociology: State and Development Prospects. Lichnost’. Kul’tura. Obschestvo [Personality. Culture. Society]. Vol. 20. No. 1–2: 158–191. (In Russ.)

2. Guba K. (2019) To be the Flagship Journal of Russian Sociology: When the Mission Matters. Ekonomicheskaya sotsiologiya. [Journal of Economic Sociology]. Vol. 20. No. 4: 14–38. DOI: 10.17323/1726-3247-2019-4-14-38. (In Russ.)

3. Kintcharova A.V., Sokolov M.M. (2015) Research Practices of Russian Sociologists. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 6: 58–68. (In Russ.)

4. Klimov I.A., Klimova S.G., Mikheyenkova M.A. (2019) Developing a Common Language Area in Interdisciplinary Interaction: Reflections on the Experience of Cooperation between Specialists Working in Exact and Social Sciences, 1990–2010s. Sotsiologicheskiy zhurnal. [Sociological Journal]. Vol. 25. No. 3: 117–132. DOI: 10.19181/socjour.2019.25.3.6679. (In Russ.)

5. Kuleshova A.V., Podvoyskiy D.G. (2018) Paradoxes of Publication Activity in the Field of Contemporary Russian Science: Genesis, Diagnosis, Trends. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: Ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny [Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes]. No. 4: 169–210. DOI: 10.14515/monitoring.2018.4.10. (In Russ.)

6. Orlov A.I. (2013) Two Types of Methodological Errors in the Management of Scientific Activity. In: Novikov D.A., Orlov A.I., Chebotarev P.Yu. (eds) Management of Large Systems. Collected works. Special issue 44: Scientometry and Expertise in the Management of Science. Moscow: IPU RAS: 32–55. (In Russ.)

7. Sokolov M.M. (2012) On a Process of Academic (De)Civilization. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. [Sociological Studies]. No. 8: 21–30. (In Russ.)

8. Tatarova G.G. (2011) The 4M-field in Russian Sociology: On the Occasion of the 20th Anniversary of the Journal. Sotsiologiya: metodologiya, metody, matematicheskoe modelirovanie. [Sociology: Methodology, Methods, Mathematical Modeling]. No. 32: 5–25. (In Russ.)

9. Tatarova G.G. (2014b) Coherence of Integrative Processes as Precondition for Improvement of Empirical Research Quality in Russia. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. [Sociological Studies]. No. 7: 72–84. (In Russ.)

10. Tatarova G.G. (2014a) Mathematical Formalization in Sociology: Causes of Failure and Modern Methodological Challenges. In: Nasibullin R.T. (ed.) Theoretical and Methodological Problems of Natural Science Methods in the Humanities. Materials of the International Scientific and Practical Conference: collected papers. Ufa: Izdatel’stvo AETERNA: 17–28. (In Russ.)

11. Tolstova Yu.N. (2013) Has Research Methods Effectiveness Grown in Russian Sociology for the Last 100 Years? Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. [Sociological Studies]. No. 7: 59–60. (In Russ.)

12. Toshchenko Zh.T. (2013) New Trends in the Development of Russian Sociology. In: New Ideas in Sociology. Moscow: YuNITI-DANA: 10–24. (In Russ.)

13. Toshchenko Zh.T. (2014) To the Reader. On Methodological and Method Culture Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. [Sociological Studies]. No. 1: 3–6. (In Russ.)

14. Shcherbina V.V. (2012) Is there a Science of Sociology Today? Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. [Sociological Studies]. No. 8: 31–41. (In Russ.)

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up