Society of Trauma in Search of Healing (Invitation to the Discussion)

 
PIIS013216250009344-1-1
DOI10.31857/S013216250009344-1
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: Director; Scientific Director of the Institute of Sociology and Regional Studies
Affiliation:
South Russian Branch of FCTAS RAS
Southern Federal University
Address: Russian Federation, Rostov-on-Don
Journal nameSotsiologicheskie issledovaniya
EditionIssue 9
Pages16-27
Abstract

The article was written as a response to the publication of the monograph "Trauma Society" by Zh.T. Toshchenko, it is an analytical review of the ideas presented there. First of all it concerns the basic concept of this monograph – “a trauma society”. The article systematizes and examines in detail some generic and specific characteristics of such a society represented in the monograph. The author of the article, while carrying out a comparative analysis of the cultural trauma concept by P. Shtompka and trauma society concept by Toshchenko, shows significant theoretical differences between them as well as certain points of similarity. He emphasizes relevance of the panoramic approach developed in the monograph for modern sociological science as well as importance of broad macro-sociological generalizations for studying current Russian society. The concept of a “trauma society” based on the statement of the fundamental importance of development for any society postulates social trauma as a condition that impedes any development. The author of the article by means of textual analysis shows depth and interdependence of problems raised in the monograph which are related to the formation of a trauma society in Russia. He outlines necessity of elaborating some theoretical paradigm based on the synthesis of sociology and social philosophy. At the same time he states that the extensive material obtained by means of empirical sociological research is a basis for verification and specification of theoretical propositions reaching the level of philosophical and historical conceptualization. The author of the article emphasizes debatability of the “trauma society” concept, which needs further reflection in the domestic sociological discourse.

Keywordstrauma society, cultural trauma, development, progress, panoramic approach, evolution, social uncertainty, social inequality, alienation
Received21.04.2020
Publication date21.09.2020
Number of characters39346
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 1398

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Aganbegyan A.G. (2019) On urgent measures to resume social and economic growth. Problemy prognozirovaniya [Problems of forecasting]. No. 1: 3–15. (In Russ.)

2. Kucheva A.V. (2016) The concept of cultural trauma and the possibility of its application to the interpretation of historical events. Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kulʹturologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki [Historical, philosophical, political and legal sciences, cultural studies and art history. Questions of theory and practice]. Tambov. No. 8 (70): 118–120. (In Russ.)

3. Latour B. (2014) Reassembly of the Social. Introduction to Actor-Network Theory. Transl. from Eng. by I. Polonskaya; ed. by S. Gavrilenko. Moscow: VHSE. (In Russ.)

4. Shirokalova G.S. (2019) What is happening within the social structure of Russian society? Reviewing Zh. Toschenko’s study “The precariat: from the proto-class to a new class”. Vestnik instituta sotziologii [Bulletin of the Institute of Sociology]. Vol. 10. No. 3: 165–172. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/vis.2019.30.3.598

5. Shtompka P. (2001a) Cultural trauma in a post-communist society. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 2: 3–12. (In Russ.)

6. Shtompka P. (2001b) Social change as an injury. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 1: 6–16. (In Russ.)

7. Toshchenko Zh.T. (2020) Trauma Society: Between Evolution and revolution (Experience of Theoretical and Empirical Analysis). Moscow: Ves’ Mir. (In Russ.)

8. Toshchenko Zh.T. (2018) Precatariat: from Protoclass to New Class. Moscow: Nauka. (In Russ.)

9. Wallerstein I. (2001) Analysis of World Systems and the Situation in the Modern World. Transl. from Eng. by P.M. Kudyukin; ed. B.Yu. Kagarlitsky. St. Petersburg: Univer. kniga. (In Russ.)

10. Yanitsky O.N. (2003) Sociology of risk: key ideas. Mir Rossii [Universe of Russia]. Vol. XII. No. 1: 3–35. (In Russ.)

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up