The Relationship Between Volunteerism and Charitable Giving: Intergenerational Context

 
PIIS013216250007103-6-1
DOI10.31857/S013216250007103-6
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: Director of the Center for Studies of the Nonprofit Sector and Civil Society, Head of the Chair Economics and Management of NPOs
Affiliation: National Research University Higher School of Economics
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Occupation: Senior Research Fellow of the Center for Studies of the Nonprofit Sector and Civil Society
Affiliation: National Research University Higher School of Economics
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Occupation: Senior Lecturer of the Department for Applied Economics, the Economics Faculty
Affiliation: National Research University Higher School of Economics
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Journal nameSotsiologicheskie issledovaniya
EditionIssue 10
Pages94-106
Abstract

The rise of private donations, both in Russia and abroad, has become a leading factor in the formation of the nonprofits’ resource base. A considerable number of studies have looked into socio-demographic factors positively associated with charity, such as age, education and income level. This paper explicitly targets the association between parental volunteering and the participation of children in charitable donations as they grow up. The study draws on the results of an All-Russia Representative Survey (N=1,200). The results of the survey provide solid evidence supporting the conclusion about a significant and positive relationship between volunteering and charitable giving in the context of intergenerational transmission. The results of the regression analysis demonstrate stability with the change of the model specification and a set of control variables. This paper confirms prior findings by international scholars about the twofold effect of parental volunteering: parents who volunteer are more likely to have children who also volunteer, and parents who volunteer are more likely to have children who donate. The conclusions of this study reinforce prior research that established the effect of volunteering on charity. The insights generated from the analysis of the relationship between parental volunteering and children’s charitable giving have implications for better understanding of factors that influence charitable giving. The paper has immediate practice relevance for nonprofits. Considering the results of this research, nonprofits can develop long-term fundraising strategies, including programs that allow both parents and children to participate in volunteering. 

Keywordsvolunteerism, charitable giving, monetary donations, intergenerational transmission, regression analysis
AcknowledgmentThis work was supported by the Program for Basic Research of the National Research University Higher School of Economics.
Received12.10.2019
Publication date13.10.2019
Number of characters32913
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 1641

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Anheier H.K., Salamon L. M. (2006) The Nonprofit Sector in Comparative Perspective. In: Powell W.E., Steinberg R. (eds) The Nonprofit Sector: A Research Handbook (2nd ed.). New Haven: Yale University Press: 89–116.

2. Bekkers R. (2006) Keeping the Faith: Origins of Confidence in Charitable Organizations and Its Consequences for Philanthropy. Paper presented at the NCVO/VSSN Researching the Voluntary Sector Conference 2006. Warwick University, September 13–14, 2006.

3. Bekkers R. (2007) Intergenerational transmission of volunteering. Acta Sociologica. Vol. 50: 99–114.

4. Bekkers R., Wiepking P. (2011) Who gives? A literature review of predictors of charitable giving Part One: Religion, education, age and socialization. Voluntary Sector Review. Vol. 2. No. 3: 337–365.

5. Benevolensky V.B, Ivanov V.A, Mersianova I.V. et al. (2019) Volunteerism and Charity in Russia and the National Development Goalsю In: Report for the 20th International April research Conference on the Development of Economy and Society. Ed. by I. Mersianova. Moscow: NIU VSHEh. (In Russ.)

6. Eisenberg N. (2000) Emotion, Regulation, and Moral Development. Annual Review of Psychology. Vol. 51. No. 1: 665–697.

7. Feldman N. E. (2009) Time is Money: Choosing Between Charitable Activities’, American Economic Journal: Economic Policy. Vol. 2. No.1: 103–130.

8. Hill M. (2012) The Relationship Between Volunteering and Charitable Giving: Review of Evidence. CGAP Working Paper. April.

9. Jones K.S. (2006) Giving and Volunteering as Distinct Forms of Civic Engagement: The Role of Community Integration and Personal Resources in Formal Helping. Nonprofit andVoluntary Sector Quarterly. Vol. 35. No. 2: 249–266.

10. Malakhov D. (2018) The Use of the Internet and Trust in TV and Online Media in Russia. Prikladnaya ehkonometrika [Applied Econometrics]. Vol. 50: 67–89. (In Russ.)

11. Mersianova I.V., Korneeva I. E. (2013) Charity and the Participation of Russians in Civil Society Practices: the Regional Dimension. Moscow: NIU VSHEh. (In Russ.)

12. Mersianova I.V., Korneeva I. E. (2017) The Impact of Trust on Russians’ Participation in Charities. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskiye i sotsialnye peremeny. [Public Opinion Monitoring: Economic and Social Changes]. No. 2: 145–159. (In Russ.)

13. Osili U., Clark C., Bergdoll J. (2016) A Tradition of Giving. Indiana University Lilly Family School of Philanthropy. URL: https://cdn.vcapps.org/sites/default/files/upload/A%20tradition%20of%20giving_Final_0.pdf  (accessed 15.03.2019).

14. Steinberg R., Wilhelm M. (2003). Giving: The Next Generation – Parental Effects on Donations. Circulating as Working Paper No. CPNS 21. Brisbane, AU: Centre of Philanthropy and Nonprofit Studies, Queensland University of Technology.

15. Wiepking P., Bekkers R. (2012). Who Gives? A Literature Review of Predictors of Charitable Giving. Part Two: Gender, Family Composition and Income. Voluntary Sector Review. Vol. 3. No. 2: 217–245.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up