Dynamics of Interpersonal Evaluations under Different Involvement in Communicative Situation

Demidov, A. A.; Ananyeva, Kristina

doi:10.31857/S020595920026153-4

Home

Psikhologicheskii zhurnal

Issue 3

Dynamics of Interpersonal Evaluations under Different Involvement in Communicative Situation

Annotation
Reviews
References

Dynamics of Interpersonal Evaluations under Different Involvement in Communicative Situation

PII

S020595920026153-4-1

DOI

10.31857/S020595920026153-4

Publication type

Article

Status

Published

Authors

A. A. Demidov

Occupation: Associate Professor, Department of General Psychology
Affiliation: Moscow Institute of Psychoanalysis
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow

Kristina Ananyeva

Occupation: Research Associate at the Laboratory of Psychology of Cognitive Processes and Mathematical Psychology
Affiliation: Institute of Psychology, Russian Academy of Sciences
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow

Journal name

Psikhologicheskii zhurnal

Edition

Volume 44 Issue 3

Pages

18-25

Abstract

The objective of the research was to test the hypothesis about the relationship between the features of communicative situations and the perception of a stranger. Three types of situations were used, differing in the degree of the observer's involvement in communication: 1. looking at a photo image of the sitter, 2. watching a video with the sitter in communication, 3. communicating with the sitter “face to face”. It has been shown that the dynamics of interpersonal evaluations are multidirectional and depend rather on the diagnostic metrics used. Thus, the values of adequacy of evaluation of individual psychological features of the sitter are higher in the situation of photo perception as compared to the situations of video perception and face-to-face communication, at the same time the values of complexity of interpersonal evaluation (number of choices of neutral evaluation “0”) are lower in the situation of face-to-face communication and the situation of video perception as compared to the situation of photo perception. The study revealed the dynamics of interpersonal evaluations in different communicative situations, i.e. it was shown how situations influence the way the perception of a communication partner is formed.

Keywords

ontological approach, interpersonal perception, communicative situation, evaluation adequacy, personal qualities

Acknowledgment

The research was supported by the Russian Science Foundation, project no. 20-18-00516 “Ontological foundations of interpersonal perception”

Publication date

28.06.2023

Number of characters

19352

Cite

GOST	Demidov A., Ananyeva K. Dynamics of Interpersonal Evaluations under Different Involvement in Communicative Situation // Psikhologicheskii zhurnal – 2023. – V. 44. – Issue 3 C. 18-25 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://psy.jes.su/S020595920026153-4-1 (circulation date: 20.05.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S020595920026153-4
MLA	Demidov, A. A., Ananyeva, Kristina "Dynamics of Interpersonal Evaluations under Different Involvement in Communicative Situation." Psikhologicheskii zhurnal 44.3 (2023):18-25. DOI: 10.31857/S020595920026153-4
APA	Demidov A., Ananyeva K. (2023). Dynamics of Interpersonal Evaluations under Different Involvement in Communicative Situation. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal 44(3), pp.18-25 DOI: 10.31857/S020595920026153-4

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 125

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Barabanshhikov V.A., Nosulenko V.N. Sistemnost'. Vosprijatie. Obshhenie. Moscow: IP RAN, 2004. (In Russian)

2. Gibson Dzh. Jekologicheskij podhod k zritel'nomu vosprijatiju. Tr. from engl. A.D. Logvinenko. Moscow: Izd. KoLibri, 1988. 464 p. (In Russian)

3. Grishina N.V. Problema konceptualizacii konteksta v sovremennoj psihologii. Social'naja psihologija i obshhestvo. 2018. V. 9. № 3. P. 10–20. (In Russian)

4. Demidov A.A. Jekologicheskij podhod k izucheniju mezhlichnostnogo vosprijatija: metodologija i rezul'taty issledovanij. Poznanie i perezhivanie. 2022. V. 3. № 1. P. 6 –27. (In Russian)

5. Zhiznennoe prostranstvo v psihologii: Teorija i fenomenologija: sbornik statej. Eds. N.V. Grishinoj, S.N. Kostrominoj. Saint-Petersburg.: Izd-vo S.-Peterb.un-ta, 2020. 532 p. (In Russian)

6. Levin K. Dinamicheskaja psihologija. Izbrannye trudy. Tr. from engl. and germ. E. Patjaeva, D. Leont'eva. Moscow: Smysl, 2001. 572 p. (In Russian)

7. Ross L., Nisbett R. Chelovek i situacija. Perspektivy social'noj psihologii Tr. from engl. V.V. Rumynskogo; Eds. E.N. Emel'janova, V.S. Maguna. Moscow: Aspekt Press, 1999. 429 p. (In Russian)

8. Cooper W.H., Withey M.J. The strong situation hypothesis. Personality and Social Psychology Review. 2009. V. 13. № 1. P. 62–72.

9. Funder D.C. Personality judgment: A realistic approach to person perception. Academic Press, 1999.

10. Funder D.C. Taking situations seriously: The situation construal model and the Riverside Situational Q-sort. Current Directions in Psychological Science. 2016. V. 25. № 3. P 203–208.

11. Kenny D.A. PERSON: A General Model of Interpersonal Perception. Personality and Social Psychology Review. 2004. V. 8. № 3. P. 265–280.

12. Magnusson D. Toward a psychology of situations: An interactional perspective. Hillsdale New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1981.

13. McArthur L.Z., Baron R.M. Toward an ecological theory of social perception. Psychological Review. 1983. V. 90. P. 215–238.

14. Rauthmann J.F., Sherman R.A. Toward a Research Agenda for the Study of Situation Perceptions: A Variance Componential Framework. Personality and Social Psychology Review. 2019. V. 23. № 3. P. 238–266.

15. Rauthmann J.F., Sherman R.A. The Situation of Situation Research: Knowns and Unknowns. Current Directions in Psychological Science. 2020. V. 29. № 5. P. 473–480.

16. Shoda Y., Mischel W. Reconciling contextualism with the core assumptions of personality psychology. European Journal of Personality. 2000. V. 14. № 5. P. 407–428.