Bibliometric Analysis of the Three-Volume Labor “Development of the Concepts of Modern Psychology” (2018–2021)

 
PIIS020595920024366-8-1
DOI10.31857/S020595920024366-8
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: Professor, Scientific Adviser of Institute of Psychology RAS
Affiliation: Institute of Psychology RAS
Address: Moscow, Yaroslavskaya str., 13, building 1
Occupation: Chief researcher of the laboratory of psychology of development of the subject in normal and post-traumatic States
Affiliation: Institute of Psychology RAS
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Occupation: Head of the Department of Clinical Psychology
Affiliation: Novosibirsk State University
Address: Russian Federation, Novosibirsk
Journal namePsikhologicheskii zhurnal
EditionVolume 44 Issue 1
Pages113-126
Abstract

The article presents a bibliometric analysis of the concepts analyzed by scientists from the Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences and disclosed in three volumes of the work “Development of modern concepts of psychology” (2018, 2019 and 2021). The generalization carried out for all the presented concepts made it possible to put forward a hypothesis about the existence of metaconcepts — the subject and the collective subject, which pull together the network organization of conceptual fields, setting the architecture of their system-network organization. The conducted bibliometric analysis of the concepts of three volumes showed that the mapping of concepts makes it possible to identify clusters of network organization, among which there are two, which can be conditionally designated as “individual subject” and “collective subject”. Only the morpheme “psychologist-”, outstripping all the others in frequency of occurrence. These results may support the hypothesis of the existence of “meta-concepts” and their role in the system-network organization. Comparative analysis of the concept map based on the author's keywords of publications indexed in Scopus for five years, “contraction” of terms into complexes that can be designated as individual and collective subjects could not be found, while the analysis of articles in the same database by the same authors discovered two centers in 20 years. The individual and collective subject become central concepts, with multiple connections. The question of hierarchical conceptual organization remains open due to the limited possibilities of bibliometric analysis, which does not allow revealing such relationships between concepts. Bibliometric analysis made it possible to show the network organization of modern concepts, the existence of thematic conceptual fields and leave open the question of their system-network organization.

Keywordsbibliometric analysis, modern concepts of psychology, mapping, clustering of concepts, subject, collective subject, thematic conceptual fields, thematic mapping, morphemic analysis
Publication date26.02.2023
Number of characters29207
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 1, views: 112

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Zhuravlev A.L., Sergienko E.A. Analiz sovremennyh ponjatij v psihologii. Chast' I. Opyt sistematizacii ponjatij. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal, 2021. V. 42. № 3. P. 5–15.

2. Zhuravlev A.L., Sergienk E.A. Analiz sovremennyh ponjatij v psihologii. Chast' II. Razrabotka sovremennyh ponjatij uchenymi instituta psihologii RAN. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2021. V. 42. № 4. P. 5–15.

3. Zhuravlev A.L., Sergienko E.A. Sistemno-setevaja organizacija sovremennyh ponjatij psihologii (na primere razrabotok sotrudnikov Instituta psihologii RAN). Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2022. V. 43. № 3. P. 5–14.

4. Gusel'ceva M.S. Jevoljucija psihologicheskogo znanija v smene tipov racional'nosti. Moscow: Akropol', 2013.

5. Kedrov B.M. Klassifikacija nauk. Prognoz K. Marksa o nauke budushhego. Moscow: Mysl', 1985.

6. Kostrigin A.A., Husjaino T.M. Imja L.S. Vygotskogo kak ob#ekt Digital Humanities. Istorija rossijskoj psihologii v licah: Dajdzhest. 2016. № 6. P. 44–66.

7. Kostrigin A.A., Husjainov T.M. Digital Humanities v istorii psihologii (na primere familii V.M. Behtereva). Cifrovoj uchenyj: laboratorija filosofa. 2018. V. 1. № 1. P. 160–179.

8. Mazilov V.A., Batyrshina A.R. Vozmozhnosti naukometricheskogo podhoda v istoriko-psihologicheskom issledovanii (na primere problemy voli v otechestvennoj psihologii). Jaroslavskij psihologicheskij vestnik. 2016. № 36. P. 63–74.

9. Morgun A.N. Naukometricheskoe prostranstvo issledovanij po istorii psihologii: prirosty i izderzhki. Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie. 2019. № 2. P. 136–146.

10. Morgun A.N., Olejnik Ju.N., Zhuravlev A.L. Tematicheskie napravlenija otechestvennoj istorii psihologii kak vnutrennie faktory razvitija otrasli: naukometricheskij analiz na materiale RINC. Institut psihologii Rossijskoj akademii nauk. Social'naja i jekonomicheskaja psihologija. 2021. V. 6. №. 1. P. 219–251.

11. Psihologicheskie issledovanija v internet-prostranstve: poiskovye sistemy, social'nye seti, jelektronnye bazy. Eds. A.L. Zhuravlev, D.A. Kitova. Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psihologii RAN”, 2020.

12. Razrabotka ponjatij sovremennoj psihologii. Eds. E.A. Sergienko, A.L. Zhuravlev. Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psihologii RAN”. 2018.

13. Razrabotka ponjatij sovremennoj psihologii. V. 2. Eds. A.L. Zhuravlev, E.A. Sergienko, G.A. Vilenskaja. Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psihologii RAN”. 2019.

14. Razrabotka ponjatij sovremennoj psihologii. V. 3. Eds. A.L. Zhuravlev, E.A. Sergienko, N.E. Harlamenkova, G.A. Vilenskaja. Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psihologii RAN”. 2021.

15. Sergienko E.A. Sistemno-sub#ektnyj podhod: obosnovanie i perspektiva. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2011. V. 32. № 1. P. 120–132.

16. Fedorov A.A. Bibliometricheskij analiz publikacij po postneklassicheskoj psihologii v Scopus. Reflexio. 2018. V. 11. № 1. P. 37–46.

17. Fedorov A.A. Bibliometricheskij analiz publikacij po postneklassicheskoj psihologii v RINC. Voprosy psihologii. 2019. № 4. P. 135–145.

18. Fedorov A.A. Postmodernizm v psihologii: bibliometricheskij analiz. Psihologija. Zhurnal Vysshej shkoly jekonomiki. 2021. V. 18. № 2. P. 410–423.

19. Filippu O.Ju. Bibliometricheskij analiz ponjatija makiavellizma v zarubezhnoj i otechestvennoj psihologii. Sovremennaja zarubezhnaja psihologija”. 2020. V. 9. № 4. P. 120–128.

20. Aria M., Cuccurull C. Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of informetrics. 2017. V. 11. № 4. P. 959–975.

21. Danziger K. Origins and basic principles of Wundt’s Völkerpsychologie. British Journal of Social Psychology. 1983. V. 22. № 4. P. 303–313.

22. Traag V.A., Waltman L., Van Eck N.J. From Louvain to Leiden: guaranteeing well-connected communities. Scientific reports. 2019. V. 9. № 1. P. 1–12.

23. Van Eck N.J., Waltman L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics. 2010. V. 84. № 2. P. 523–538.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up