The Phenomenon of Responsibility in the Structure of Russians' Concepts about Professional Activities

 
PIIS020595920022781-5-1
DOI10.31857/S020595920022781-5
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: Leading Researcher of Laboratory of History of Psychology and Historical Psychology
Affiliation: Institute of Psychology, Russian Academy of Sciences
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Occupation: Professor, Scientific Adviser of Institute of Psychology RAS
Affiliation: Institute of Psychology RAS
Address: Yaroslavskaya str., 13, building 1
Journal namePsikhologicheskii zhurnal
EditionVolume 43 Issue 5
Pages47-57
Abstract

The paper analyzes the state of research on the phenomenon of responsibility in the scientific literature and its place within the framework of psychological knowledge, including in the context of professional and entrepreneurial activities. It is shown that the macropsychological analysis of the attitude of Russians to the social aspects of responsibility as a psychological phenomenon is an actual, but little studied problem. The study is aimed at identifying the structural and content characteristics of social network users' perceptions of professional responsibility as a unique (not identical) phenomenon to other types of responsibility. In accordance with the stated goal, there is an appeal to neural network automated methods for analyzing large amounts of information according to semantic, frequency and emotional criteria. The general classification of messages is made in the expert mode. The results of the study made it possible to formulate a number of main conclusions: responsibility is perceived as an inalienable component of professional activity; the greatest responsibility is attributed to professionals responsible for the well-being of others; the more people are in the sphere of distribution of the powers of a professional, the higher the level of responsibility attributed to him; professional responsibility gives rise to a wide range of different experiences, in the structure of which a dishonest attitude to the fulfillment of one's obligations causes extremely negative assessments. The paper reveals the principles of personalization and depersonalization of responsibility. In the future, an analysis of similar ideas of residents of other countries is proposed.

Keywordsresponsibility, professional responsibility, entrepreneurial activity, macropsychology, user messages, automated analysis, emotional background, authority, attribution, negative assessments, personalization, depersonalization
AcknowledgmentThe study was financially supported by the Russian Science Foundation (RSF) within the framework of scientific project No. 21–18–00541.
Publication date16.11.2022
Number of characters31432
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 297

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Dvojnikova A.A., Karpov A.A. Analiticheskij obzor podhodov k raspoznavaniyu tonal'nosti russkoyazychnyh tekstovyh dannyh. Informacionno-upravlyayushchie sistemy. 2020. № 4 (107). P. 20–30. (In Russian)

2. Dementij L.I. K probleme mery otvetstvennosti. Lichnost'. Kul'tura. Obshchestvo. 2004. V. 6. № 3(23). P. 264–274. (In Russian)

3. Demidova O.A. Metod maksimal'nogo pravdopodobiya. URL: https://www.hse.ru/staff/demidova_olga (data obrashcheniya 28.03.2022). (In Russian)

4. Zhuravlev A.L., Kitova D.A. Social'no-psihologicheskie resursy razvitiya obshchestva v usloviyah cifrovyh tekhnologij. Sociologicheskaya nauka i social'naya praktika. 2020. V. 8. № 2(30). P. 24–40. DOI 10.19181/snsp.2020.8.2.7301. (In Russian)

5. Kochneva E.M., Morozova L.B. Professional'naya otvetstvennost' kak predmet psihologicheskih issledovanij. Vestnik Mininskogo universiteta. 2016. № 4 (17). P. 30. (In Russian)

6. Rubcova Yu.V. Avtomaticheskoe postroenie i analiz korpusa korotkih tekstov (postov mikroblogov) dlya zadachi razrabotki i trenirovki tonovogo klassifikatora. Inzheneriya znanij i tekhnologii semanticheskogo veba. 2012. V. 1. P. 109–116. (In Russian)

7. Spenser L., Spenser M. Kompetencii na rabote. Modeli maksimal'noj effektivnosti raboty. M.: Izd-vo GIPPO, 2010. (In Russian)

8. Chirkova T.I., Kochneva E.M., Myalkina S.P. Professional'nye riski v strukture professional'noj deyatel'nosti psihologa: kontekst vuzovskoj podgotovki. Nauchno-metodicheskij elektronnyj zhurnal “Koncept”. 2014. №6. P. 171–175. (In Russian)

9. Korobov M. Morphological analyzer and generator for Russian and Ukrainian languages. Communications in Computer and Information Science. 2015. V. 542. P. 330–342.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up