Verification of Reasons for Living Inventory in Russian Clinical Sample

Publication type Article
Status Published
Affiliation: Moscow Research and Clinical Center for Neuropsychiatry
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Affiliation: Moscow Research and Clinical Center for Neuropsychiatry
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Affiliation: Moscow Research and Clinical Center for Neuropsychiatry
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Affiliation: Moscow Research and Clinical Center for Neuropsychiatry
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Moscow Research and Clinical Center for Neuropsychiatry
Institute of Higher Nervous Activity and Neurophysiology, Russian Academy of Sciences
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Moscow Research and Clinical Center for Neuropsychiatry
Federal Medical Research Centre for Psychiatry and Narcology
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Moscow Research and Clinical Center for Neuropsychiatry
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
Address: Russian Federation
Journal namePsikhologicheskii zhurnal
EditionVolume 43 Issue 1

According to the WHO, about 800,000 people die from suicide each year, and 79% of suicides occur in low- and middle-income countries. However, suicide is a potentially preventable outcome. It is very important for prevention programs to identify not only risk factors associated with suicide (socio-demographic data, clinical variables), but also resilience factors that act as protection against suicide attempts. One of the tools for assessing such factors is the “Reasons for Living Inventory” – 48 cognitive reasons (items) not to commit suicide should such thoughts arise. The aim of this study is to determine and verify the factor structure of the Inventory in Russian clinical sample. The study involved 504 patients with non-psychotic mental disorders aged 18 to 82 years (median age – 27 years, interquartile range – 21, 305 women, 199 men) who were hospitalized at the Moscow Research and Clinical Centre For Neuropsychiatry. The principal component analysis was used as a statistical method to identify relationships between variables. Results of factor analysis allowed us to reveal a 7-factor model of the Inventory, which explained 62.9% of the variance – this structure is almost completely consistent with the original 6-factor model, with the exception of the “fear of suicide” subscale, divided into two subscales - one directly related to the fear of suicide, and another, which could be called “fear of failures”. The importance of isolating the latter requires further evaluation. The study showed the consistency and reliability of the Russian-language version of the RFLI when used in people with non-psychotic mental disorders.

Keywordssuicide, protective factors, factor analysis, reasons for living inventory, non-psychotic mental disorders
AcknowledgmentThe authors are grateful to Raguzin Anton Sergeevich and Popova Sofya Bayarovna for their help!
Publication date01.03.2022
Number of characters23746
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 3, views: 891

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Zhuravleva T.V. Dvorjanchikov N.V. Kliniko-psihologicheskie aspekty suicidal'nogo povedenija lic s shizofreniej. Mezhvuzovskaja nauchno-prakticheskaja internet-konferencija po juridicheskoj psihologii. 2017. Moscow. (In Russian)

2. Zhuravleva T.V., Enikolopov S.N., Zubareva O.V., Chernaja M.I. Kliniko-psihologicheskie osobennosti addiktov s nezavershennymi suicidal'nymi popytkami. Psihologija i pravo. 2015. V. 5. № 4. P. 49–70. (In Russian)

3. Zhuravleva T.V. Adaptacija metodik issledovanija suicidal'nogo potenciala lichnosti. Kursovaja rabota. Moscow: GBOU VPO MGPPU, 2014. 40 p. (In Russian)

4. Zinchuk M.S., Avedisova A.S., Geht A.B. Nesuicidal'noe samopovrezhdajushhee povedenie pri psihicheskih rasstrojstvah nepsihoticheskogo urovnja: jepidemiologija, social'nye i klinicheskie faktory riska. Zhurnal nevrologii i psihiatrii im. C.C. Korsakova. 2019. V. 119. № 3. P. 108–119. (In Russian)

5. Zinchuk M.S., Geht A.B., Guljaeva N.V., Avedisova A.S., Akzhigitov R.G., Grishkina M.N. Biologicheskie osnovy suicidal'nogo povedenija. Zhurnal nevrologii i psihiatrii im. C.C. Korsakova. 2016. V. 116. № 8. P. 94–101. (In Russian)

6. Zinchuk M.S., Rider F.K., Kustov G.V., Pashnin E.V., Akzhigitov R.G., Gudkova A.A., Geht A.B. Suicidal'nost' pri jepilepsii: jepidemiologicheskie aspekty i faktory riska. Zhurnal nevrologii i psihiatrii im. S.S. Korsakova. Specvypuski. 2018;118(10):45-52. (In Russian)

7. Zotov M. V., Petrukovich V. M., Sysoev V. N. Metodika jekspress-diagnostiki suicidal'nogo riska “Signal”. St. Petersburg: GP “Imaton”, 2003. (In Russian)

8. Lubsanova S. V., Petrun'ko O. V., Dorzhieva M. Ju. Antisuicidal'nye motivy podrostkov Burjatii, sovershivshih suicidal'nuju popytku. Sibirskij vestnik psihiatrii i narkologii. 2019. V. 3. № 104. P. 55–65. (In Russian)

9. Polozhiy B.S. Suicidal’noe povedenie (clinico-epidemiologicheskie I etnokultural’nye aspecty). Мoscow: RIO “FGU GNC SSP im. V.P. Serbskogo”, 2010. 232 p. (In Russian)

10. Filatova O. V., Litvinova N. Ju., Vinarchik E. A. Sovremennye metody psihologicheskoj diagnostiki: praktikum, 2011. (In Russian)

11. Chistopol'skaja K.A., Zhuravleva T.V., Enikolopov S.N., Nikolaev E.L. Adaptacija metodik issledovanija suicidal'nyh aspektov lichnosti. Psihologija. Zhurnal Vysshej shkoly jekonomiki. 2017. V. 14. № 1. P. 61–87. (In Russian)

12. Aishvarya S., Maniam T., Karuthan C., Sidi H., Ruzyanei N., Oei T. Psychometric properties and validation of the Reasons for Living Inventory in an outpatient clinical population in Malaysia. Comprehensive Psychiatry. 2014. V. 55. P. 107–113.

13. Chan D. W. Reasons for living among Chinese adolescents in Hong Kong. Suicide and Life‐Threatening Behavior. 1995. V. 25. № 3. P. 347–357.

14. Choi J., Rogers J. Exploring the Validity of the College Student Reasons for Living Inventory Among Asian American College Students. Archives of Suicide Research. 2010. V. 14. № 3. P. 222–235.

15. Connor K., Davidson J. Development of a new resilience scale: The Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC). Depression and Anxiety. 2003. V. 18. № 2. P. 76–82.

16. Deutsch A., Lande R. The Reasons for Living Scale—Military Version: Assessing Protective Factors Against Suicide in a Military Sample. Military Medicine. 2017. V. 182. № 7. P. 1681–1686.

17. Dobrov E., Thorell L. “Reasons For Living” – translation, psychometric evaluation and relationships to suicidal behaviour in a Swedish random sample. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry. 2004. V. 58. № 4. P. 277–285.

18. Ellis J., Range L. Differences Between Blacks and Whites, Women and Men, in Reasons for Living. Journal of Black Studies. 1991. V. 21. № 3. P. 341–347.

19. Feldman R. What is resilience: an affiliative neuroscience approach. World Psychiatry. 2020. V. 19. № 2. P. 132–150.

20. Garza M. J., Cramer R. J. The Spanish Reasons for Living Inventory (SRFL-I): Factor structure and association with suicide risk among Spanish speaking Hispanics. Archives of Suicide Research. 2011. V. 15. №. 4. P. 354–371.

21. Gutierrez P., Osman A. Adolescent suicide. DeKalb, Illinios: Northern Illinois, 2008.

22. Hirsch J., Chang E., KelliherRabon J.A Positive Psychological Approach to Suicide. Advances in Mental Health and Addiction, 2018.

23. Innamorati, M., Pompili, M., Ferrari, V., Cavedon, G., Soccorsi, R., Aiello, S., Lelli, M. Psychometric Properties of the Reasons for Living Inventory in Italian University Students. Individual Differences Research. 2006. V. 4(1). P. 51–56.

24. Johnson J., Wood AM, Gooding P, Taylor PJ, Tarrier N. Resilience to suicidality: The buffering hypothesis. Clinical Psychology Review. 2011. V. 31. № 4. P. 563–591.

25. Kleiman E., Beaver J. A meaningful life is worth living: Meaning in life as a suicide resiliency factor. Psychiatry Research. 2013. V. 210. № 3. P. 934–939.

26. Klonsky E., Saffer B., Bryan C. Ideation-to-action theories of suicide: a conceptual and empirical update. Current Opinion in Psychology. 2018. V. 22. P. 38–43.

27. Lee Y., Oh K. Validation of Reasons for Living and Their Relationship with Suicidal Ideation in Korean College Students. Death Studies. 2012. V. 36. № 8. P. 712–722.

28. Linehan M., Goodstein L., Nielsen S., Chiles J. Reasons for staying alive when you are thinking of killing yourself: The Reasons for Living Inventory. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1983. V. 51. № 2. P. 276–286.

29. Lizardi D., Dervic K., Grunebaum M., Burke A., Mann J., Oquendo M.The role of moral objections to suicide in the assessment of suicidal patients. Journal of Psychiatric Research. 2008. V. 42. № 10. P. 815–821.

30. Lutz J., Edelstein B., Katz E., Gallegos J. A shortened version of the reasons for living—older adults scale for clinical and research utility. The Gerontologist, 59(4), e241-e247.. A Shortened Version of the Reasons for Living—Older Adults Scale for Clinical and Research Utility. The Gerontologist. 2018. V. 59. № 4. P. 241–247.

31. Malone K., Oquendo M., Haas G., Ellis S., Li S, Mann J. Protective Factors Against Suicidal Acts in Major Depression: Reasons for Living. American Journal of Psychiatry. 2000. V. 157. № 7. P. 1084–1088.

32. May A., Klonsky E. What Distinguishes Suicide Attempters From Suicide Ideators? A Meta-Analysis of Potential Factors. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice. 2016. V. 23. № 1. P. 5–20.

33. May A., Klonsky E., Klein D. Predicting future suicide attempts among depressed suicide ideators: A 10-year longitudinal study. Journal of Psychiatric Research. 2012. V. 46. № 7. P. 946–952.

34. McBee-Strayer S. M., Rogers J. R. Lesbian, gay, and bisexual suicidal behavior: Testing a constructivist model. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior. 2002. V. 32. № 3. P. 272–283.

35. Menon V. Suicide risk assessment and formulation: An update. Asian Journal of Psychiatry. 2013. V. 6. № 5. P. 430–435.

36. Nepon J., Belik S. L., Bolton J., Sareen J. The relationship between anxiety disorders and suicide attempts: findings from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. Depression and Anxiety. 2010. V. 27. № 9. P. 791–798.

37. Nock M., Borges G., Bromet E., Alonso J., Angermeyer M., Beautrais A., Bruffaerts R., Chiu W., de Girolamo G., Gluzman S., de Graaf R., Gureje O., Haro J., Huang Y., Karam E., Kessler R., Lepine J., Levinson D., Medina-Mora M., Ono Y., Posada-Villa J., Williams D. Cross-national prevalence and risk factors for suicidal ideation, plans and attempts. British Journal of Psychiatry. 2008. V. 192. № 2. P. 98–105.

38. Nordentoft M., Mortensen P., Pedersen C. Absolute Risk of Suicide After First Hospital Contact in Mental Disorder. Archives of General Psychiatry. 2011. V. 68. № 10. P. 1058.

39. Osman A., Gregg C. L., Osman J. R., Jones, K. Factor Structure and Reliability of the Reasons for Living Inventory. Psychological Reports. 1992. V. 70. № 1. P. 107–112.

40. Osman A., Downs W.,Kopper B., Barrios F., Baker M., Osman J.,Besett T., Linehan M. The reasons for living inventory for adolescents (RFL-A): Development and psychometric properties. Journal of Clinical Psychology. 1998. V. 54. № 8. P. 1063–1078.

41. Phillips M. R., Yang G., Zhang Y., Wang L., Ji H., Zhou, M. Risk factors for suicide in China: a national case-control psychological autopsy study. The Lancet. 2002. V. 360. № 9347. P. 1728–1736.

42. Pinto A., Whisman M., Conwell Y. Reasons for living in a clinical sample of adolescents. Journal of Adolescence. 1998. V. 21. № 4. P. 397–405.

43. Pompili M., Girardi P., Tatarelli R., Lester D., Rogers, J.Reasons for Living Inventory: Cross-Cultural Construct Validity. Psychological Reports. 2007. V. 100, № 3_suppl. p. 1259-1262.

44. Range M., Knott C. Twenty suicide assessment instruments: evaluation and recommendations. Death Studies. 1997. V. 21. № 1. P. 25–58.

45. Richardson-Vejlgaard R., Sher L., Oquendo M., Lizardi D., Stanley, B. Moral objections to suicide and suicidal ideation among mood disordered Whites, Blacks, and Hispanics. Journal of Psychiatric Research. 2009. V. 43. № 4. P. 360–365.

46. Rogers J. R., Hanlon P. J. Psychometric Analysis of the College Student Reasons for Living Inventory. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development. 1996. V. 29. № 1. P. 13–24.

47. Rowe J., Conwell Y., Schulberg H., Bruce M. Social Support and Suicidal Ideation in Older Adults Using Home Healthcare Services. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry. 2006. V. 14. № 9. P. 758–766.

48. Smith B., Dalen J., Wiggins K., Tooley E., Christopher P., Bernard J. 2008. The brief resilience scale: Assessing the ability to bounce back. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine. 2008. V. 15. № 3. P. 194–200.

49. Turecki G., Brent D. Suicide and suicidal behaviour. The Lancet. 2016. V. 387. № 10024. P. 1227–1239.

50. Van de Vijver F., Hambleton R. Translating Tests. European Psychologist. 1996. V. 1. № 2. P. 89–99.

51. Westefeld J., Badura A., Kiel J., Scheel K. Development of the College Student Reasons for Living Inventory with African Americans. Journal of College Student Psychotherapy. 1996. V. 10. № 4. P. 61–65.

52. Westefeld J. S., Cardin D., Deaton W. L. Development of the college student reasons for living inventory. Suicide and Life‐Threatening Behavior. 1992. V. 22. № 4. P. 442–453.

53. World Health Organization. Global Health Observatory data repository. WHO, 2018.

54. World Health Organization. Preventing suicide: a global imperative. Geneva: WHO, 2014.

Система Orphus