Questionnaire “People and plants” (PaP): a study of human relations to the plant world

 
PIIS020595920007984-8-1
DOI10.31857/S020595920007984-8
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: professor
Affiliation: Higher School of Economics National Research University
Address: Moscow, Myasnitskaya St., 20
Occupation: Associate professor
Affiliation: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education
Address: Moscow, Sretenka Str., 29
Journal namePsikhologicheskii zhurnal
EditionVolume 41 issue 1
Pages86-96
Abstract

Development of the questionnaire “People and plants” aimed at assessing individual variety in person’s interaction with the plant world. The method’s relevancy for studies on the restorative function of the natural environment is substantiated. 732 respondents participated in the study (Mage = 19.1, SDage = 2.1, 549 female, 137 male, 46 did not indicate their gender). The questionnaire includes 32 statements measured on a four-point scale, and five sub-scales: Joy, Esthetics, Practice, Closeness to nature, and Ecology. The new tool has satisfactory psychometric characteristics (retest reliability and consistency) and convergent validity, verified by comparison with questionnaires Nature connectedness and Environmental identity. Gender differences are found: all scores except Practice are higher in the female group. The questionnaire can be recommended for research, educational and psycho-developmental programs.

KeywordsEnvironmental psychology, plants, questionnaire, validity, reliability, consistency
AcknowledgmentThe study was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (project No. 9-013-00216).
Received20.12.2019
Publication date27.12.2019
Number of characters23183
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 1, views: 2244

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Muhortova E.A. Novyj metod ekologicheskoj psihologii “Lyudi i rasteniya” // Molodye uchenye ― stolichnomu obrazovaniyu. HV Gorodskaya nauchno-prakticheskaya konferenciya. 2016. P. 237–238. (In Russian)

2. Nartova-Bochaver S.K. Narodnaya skazka kak sredstvo stihijnoj psihoterapii // Skazki narodov mira. Hrestomatiya / Ed. K.M. Nartova. Moscow: Institut prakticheskoj psihologii, 1996. P. 3–15. (In Russian)

3. Nartova-Bochaver S.K. Edinstvo sub"ekta i bytiya kak osnova estestvennoj psihoterapii // Sub"ektnyj podhod v psihologii / Eds. A.L. Zhuravlev, V.V. Znakov, Z.I. Ryabikina, E.A. Sergienko E.A. Moskva: Izd-vo “Institut psihologii RAN”, 2009. P. 482–497. (In Russian)

4. Nartova-Bochaver S.K. Zhiznennye sredy kak stress i resurs: vozvrashchayas' k psihologii povsednevnosti // Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2019. V. 40. № 5. P. 15–26. (In Russian)

5. Sizyh S.V., Kuzevanov V.YA., Belozerskaya S.I., Peskov V.P. Sadovaya terapiya: ispol'zovanie resursov botanicheskogo sada dlya social'noj adaptacii i reabilitacii. Spravochno-metodicheskoe posobie. Irkutsk: Izd-vo Irk. gos. un-ta, 2006. (In Russian)

6. Frezer D. D. Zolotaya vetv'. Issledovanie magii i religii. Saint-Petersburg: Azbuka-Attikus, 2018. (In Russian)

7. Chistopol'skaya K.A., Enikolopov S.N., Nikolaev E.L., Semikin G.I. Svyaz' s prirodoj: vklad v dushevnoe blagopoluchie // Perspektivy psihologicheskoj nauki i praktiki. 2017. Moscow: Federal'noe gosudarstvennoe byudzhetnoe obrazovatel'noe uchrezhdenie vysshego obrazovaniya “Moskovskij gosudarstvennyj universitet dizajna i tekhnologii”, 2017. P. 764–767. (In Russian)

8. Sharafadina K.I. “Sezam, otkrojsya!” Floropoetika v obraznom yazyke russkoj i zarubezhnoj literatury. Saint-Petersburg: Nestor-Istoriya, 2018. (In Russian)

9. Arbucke J.L., Worthke W. Amos 4.0 User’s Guide. Chicago, IL: SmallWaters Corporation, 1999.

10. Balling J.D., Falk J.H. Development for visual preferences and natural environment // Environ. Behav. 1982. V. 14. P. 5–28.

11. Bratman G.N., Hamilton J.P., Daily G.C. The impacts of nature experience on human cognitive function and mental health // Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2012. № 1249. P. 118–136.

12. Capaldi C.A., Passmore H.A., Ishii R., Chistopolskaya K.A., Vowinckel J., Nikolaev E.L., Semikin G.I. Engaging with natural beauty may be related to well-being because it connects people to nature: Evidence from three cultures // Ecopsychology. 2017. V. 9. №. 4. P. 199–211.

13. Capaldi C.A., Dopko R.L., Zelenski J.M. The relationship between nature connectedness and happiness: a meta-analysis // Frontiers in psychology. 2014. V. 5. P. 976.

14. Clayton S., Irkhin B., Nartova-Bochaver S. Environmental Identity in Russia: Validation and Relationship to the Concern for People and Plants // Psychology. Journal of Higher School of Economics. 2019. V. 16. №. 1. P. 85–107.

15. Clayton S. Environmental identity: a conceptual and operational definition // Identity and the Natural Environment: The Psychological Significance of Nature / S. Clayton, S. Opotow (Eds.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2003. P. 45–65.

16. Davis J.L., Green J.D., Reed A. Interdependence with the environment: commitment, interconnectedness, and environmental behavior // J. Environ. Psychol. 2009. V. 29. P. 173–180.

17. Dutcher D.D., Finley J.C., Luloff A.E., Buttolph Johnson J. Connectivity with nature as a measure of environmental values // Environ. Behav. 2007. V. 39. P. 474–493.

18. Elings M. People-plant interaction: the physiological, psychological and sociological effects of plants on people // Farming for health. Dordrecht: Springer, 2006. P. 43–55.

19. Engemann K., Pedersen C.B., Arge L., Tsirogiannis C., Mortensen P.B., Svenning J.-C. Residential green space in childhood is associated with lower risk of psychiatric disorders from adolescence into adulthood // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2019. V. 116. №. 11. P. 5188–5193.

20. Field A. Discovering Statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics. London: Sage Publications Ltd, 2013.

21. Gezondheidsraad, Natuur en gezondheid: invloed van natuur op sociaal, psychisch en lichamelijk welbevinden (Deel 1 van een tweeluik: verkenning van de stand der wetenschap). Gezondheidsraad, Den Haag. 2004. GR no. 2004/09. http://www.gr.nl/pdf.php?ID=1018 (accessed on July 20, 2019)

22. Hinds J., Sparks P. The affective quality of human-natural environment relationships // Evolutionary Psychology. 2011. V. 9. №. 3. P. 147470491100900314.

23. Howell A.J., Passmore H.A., Buro K. Meaning in nature: Meaning in life as a mediator of the relationship between nature connectedness and well-being // Journal of Happiness Studies. 2013. V. 14. №. 6. P. 1681–1696.

24. Hunter M.C.R., Gillespie B.W., Chen S.Y.P. Urban nature experiences reduce stress in the context of daily life based on salivary biomarkers // Frontiers in psychology. 2019. V. 10. P. 722.

25. Kaiser M. Alternative to therapy: garden program // Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology. 1976. V. 5. №. 2. P. 21–24.

26. Kals E., Schumacher D. Montada L. Emotional affinity toward nature as a motivational basis to protect nature // Environ. Behav. 1999. V. 31. P. 178–202.

27. Kaplan R. Some psychological benefits of gardening // Environ. Behav. 1973. V. 5. № 2. P. 145–162.

28. Kaplan R. The role of nature in the context of the workplace // Landscape and Urban Planning. 1993. V. 26. № 1–4. P. 193–201.

29. Kaplan S. The restorative environment: nature and human experience // The role of horticulture in human well-being and social development: a national symposium, 19–21 April 1990. Arlington, Virginia: Timber Press, Portland, 1992. P. 134–142

30. Kellert S.R., Wilson E.O. (Eds.). The Biophilia Hypothesis. Washington, DC: Island Press, 1993.

31. Leary M.R., Tipsord J.M., Tate E.B. “Allo-inclusive identity: incorporating the social and natural worlds in to one’s sense of self” // Waymentand H.A., Bauereds J.J. (Eds.) Transcending Self-Interest: Psychological Explorations of the Quiet Ego. Washington, DC: APA. 2008. P. 137–147.

32. Lewis C.A. Green nature / Human nature: The meaning of plants in our lives. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, 1996.

33. Louv R. Last child in the woods: Saving our children from nature-deficit disorder. NY: Algonquin books, 2008.

34. Mayer F.S., Frantz C.M. The connectedness to nature scale: a mea sure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature // J. Environ. Psychol. 2004. V. 24. P. 503–515.

35. Nisbet E.K., Zelenski J.M., Murphy S.A. The nature relatedness scale: linking individuals’ connection with nature to environmental concern and behavior // Environ. Behav. 2009. V. 41. P. 715–740.

36. Owen P.J. Influence of botanic garden experience on human health. Master Thesis. Kansas: Kansas State University, Department of Horticulture, Forestry and Recreation Resources, Manhattan, 1994.

37. Raanaas R.K., Evensen K.H., Rich D., Sjøstrøm G., Patil G. Benefits of indoor plants on attention capacity in an office setting // J. Environ. Psychol. 2011. V. 31. №. 1. P. 99–105.

38. Schultz P.W. Assessing the structure of environmental concern: concern for self, other people, and the biosphere // J. Environ. Psychol. 2001. V. 21. P. 1–13.

39. Smith V.D., Aldous D.E. Effect of therapeutic horticulture on the self-concept of the mildly intellectually disabled students / Francis M., Lindsey P., Rice J.C. (Eds.). The healing dimensions of people-plant relations. UC Davis: Center for Design Research, 1994.

40. Stevenson M.P., Dewhurst R., Schilhab T., Bentsen P. Cognitive restoration in children following exposure to nature: evidence from the attention network task and mobile eye tracking // Frontiers in psychology. 2019. V. 10. P. 43.

41. Ulrich R.S., Simons R.F., Losito B.D., Fiorito E., Miles M. A., Zelson M. Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments // J. Environ. Psychol. 1991. V. 11. № 3. P. 201–230.

42. Wandersee J.H., Schussler E.E. Toward a theory of plant blindness // Plant Science Bulletin. 2001. V. 47. №. 1. P. 2–9.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up