Political myth as a type of political symbolization

 
PIIS086904990011607-9-1
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: Professor
Affiliation: Department of Political Science, National Research University “Higher School of Economics”
Address: 20, Myasnitskaya st., Moscow, 101000, Russian Federation
Journal nameObshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost
EditionIssue 5
Pages102-117
Abstract

This article analyses the features of political mythology as a manifestation of the political symbolization process. Political symbolization is defi ned as a phenomenon of unconventional media reaction to the political information presented in a specifi c form of sign systems. The research reveals the interrelation of political myths with ideology and utopia. The analysis of political myth structure shows the main diffi culty that is the ambivalent ideological myth interpretation. The article captures the main functions of political myths. The author refers to technologization and fragmentation of political myths. As a result, the myths receive a widespread use, but lose their symbolic impact force. This can be found in modern myths of “conspiracy theory”. The conclusion is that the fragments of myths can mimic modern forms of thinking.

Keywordssymbolization, political symbol, political myth, ideology, utopia, globalization, conspiracy theory
Received17.09.2020
Publication date17.10.2015
Number of characters887
Cite   Download pdf To download PDF you should sign in
Размещенный ниже текст является ознакомительной версией и может не соответствовать печатной

views: 474

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Anderson B. (2001) Voobrazhaemyie soobschestva. Razmyishleniya ob istokah i rasprostranenii natsionalizma [Imaginary Communities. Contemplations on the Origins of Nationalism Expansion] Moscow: “KANON-press-Ts”, “Kuchkovo pole”.

2. Barsenkov A.S., Vdovin A.I. (2010) Istoriya Rossii. 1917–2009 [The History of Russia] Moscow: Aspekt Press.

3. Bek U. (2001) Chto takoe globalizatsiya? Oshibki globalizma [What is globalization. Errors of Globalism] Moscow: Progress-Traditsiya.

4. Bennett L.W. (1980) Myth, ritual, and political control. Journal of Communication, no. 30, ðp. 166–179.

5. Bizeul Y. (2009) Glaube Und Politik. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag fur Sozialwissenschaften.

6. Bizeul Y. (2006) Politische Mythen, Ideologien und Utopien. Ein Defi nitionsversuch. Mythos, no. 2, S. 10–29.

7. Bizeul Y. (2000) Theorien der politischen Mythen und Rituale. Politische Mythen und Rituale in Deutschland, Frankreich und Polen. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, S. 21–32.

8. Bloch E. (1980) Abschied von der Utopie? Frankfurt/M.: Vortrage.

9. Bottici C. (2007) A Philosophy of Political Myth. Cambridge: CUP.

10. Burstin D. (1993) Amerikantsyi: kolonialnyiy opyit [American Colonial Experience] Moscow: Progress-Litera.

11. Cassirer E. (1988) Der Mythus des Staates. Frankfurt/M., Fisher Wissenschaft.

12. Castells M. (2010) The Information Age: Economy, Society, and Culture. Vol. II. The Power of Identity. Oxford: Blackwell.

13. Chernyih A. (2013) Media i ritualyi [The Media and Rituals] M., St. Petersburg: Universitetskaya kniga.

14. Chernyishev I. (1918) Agrarno-krestyanskaya politika Rossii za 150 let [Peasant and Agricultural Policy in Russia within 150 years] Petrograd: Volnoe ekonomicheskoe obschestvo.

15. Claviez T. (1998) Grenzfalle. Mythos–Ideologie–American Studies. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag.

16. Die neue Ordnung des Politischen. Zu den Herausforderungen der Demokratie am Beginn des 21. Jahrhunderts (1999) Frankfurt/M.: Campus.

17. Derrida Zh. (2000) O grammatologii [On Grammatology] Moscow: Ad Marginem.

18. Edelman M. (1967) Myths, metaphors and political conformity. Psychiatry, no. 3, pp. 217–228.

19. Eagleton T. (1991) Ideology. An Introduction. London: Verso.

20. Encyclopedia Britannica (1956) Vol. 21.

21. Fenster M. (1999) Conspiracy Theories. Secrecy and Power in American Culture. Minneapolis: Univ. of Minnesota Press.

22. Flood C.G. (2002) Political Myth. A Theoretical Introduction. New York–London: Routledge.

23. Fukuyama F. (2007) Konets istorii i posledniy chelovek [The End of History and the Last Man] Moscow: AST.

24. Gvattari F., DelYoz Zh. (1998) Chto takoe fi losofi ya? [What is philosophiy] St. Petersburg: Aleteyya.

25. Halpern B. (1960/61) “Myth” and “ideology” in modern usage. History and Theory. Studies in the Philosophy of History, no. 2., pp. 129–149.

26. Hantington S. (2003) Stolknovenie tsivilizatsiy [Clash of Civilizations] Moscow: AST.

27. Hardt M., Negri A. (2004) Imperiya [The Empire] Moscow: Praksis.

28. Hufner O. (2001) Die Struktur politischer Mythen. Wiedervereinigung und Wirtschaftswunder in den Reden bundesdeutscher Politiker 1949–1969. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.

29. Larat F. (2000) Instrumentalisierung des kollektiven Gedachtnisses und europaische Integration. Frankreich Jahrbuch 2000. Opladen: Springer, S. 199–215.

30. Levi-Strauss C. (1995) Mythos und Bedeutung. Frankfurt/M.: Vortrage.

31. Levi-Strauss C. (2001) Strukturnaya antropologiya [Structural Antropology] Moscow: EKSMOPress.

32. Lincoln B. (1989) Discourse and the Construction of Society. Comparative Studies of Myth, Ritual, and Classifi cation. New York–Oxford: OUP.

33. Mannheim K. (1994) Konservativnaya myisl’ [Conservative Thinking] Mannheim K. Diagnoz nashego vremeni. Moscow: Yurist, pp. 572–668.

34. Moscovici S. (1987) The conspiracy mentality. Changing Conceptions of Conspiracy. New York: Springer, pp. 154–171.

35. Munkler H. (2009) Die Deutschen und ihre Mythen. Berlin: Rowohlt Berlin.

36. Musihin G.I. (2008) Kontseptualnyie iz‘yanyi demokratii kak problema globalizatsii [Consept Democracy Defects as Problem of Globalization] Politiya: Analiz. Hronika. Prognoz, no. 2, pp. 31–45.

37. Nationale Mythen – kollektive Symbole. Funktionen, Konstruktionen und Medien der Erinnerung. (2005) Gottingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.

38. Pipes D. (1997) Conspiracy: How the Paranoid Style Flourishes and Where It Comes From. Touchstone: Touchstone Books.

39. Povest vremennyih let (2012) [The Tale of Bygone Years] St. Petersburg: Vita Nova.

40. Popper K. (2004) Predpolozheniya i oproverzheniya: Rost nauchnogo znaniya [Assumption and Disproof: the Growth of Scientifi c Knowledge] Moscow: AST.

41. Reichardt R., Lusebrink H.-J. (1990) Die Bastille. Zur Symbolgeschichte von Herrschaft und Freiheit. Frankfurt/M.: Fischer Taschenbuch.

42. Sandel M. (2010) Liberalism and the Limits of Justice. Cambridge: CUP.

43. Shmitt K. (2006) Politicheskiy romantizm [Political Romantizm] Moscow: Praksis.

44. Sorel Zh. (2013) Razmyishleniya o nasilii [Contemplations on Violence] Moscow: Falanster.

45. Tepe P. (1995) Mythos–Ideologie–Illusion. Mythologica, no. 3, S. 60–77.

46. Voigt R. (1989) Mythen, Rituale und Symbole in der Politik. Politik der Symbole. Symbole der Politik. Opladen: Leske + Budrich, S. 11–30.

47. Vorlander H. (2001) Demokratie ohne Grenzen und die Grenzen der Demokratie. Gibt es einen Weg zur globalen Demokratie? Weltprobleme im 21. Jahrhundert. Stuttgart: UTB, S. 215–226.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up