All
 
|
 
 


Post-Soviet Statehood and Society. Part 2. Social and Labor Market Policy at the Stage of Post-Soviet Statehood Forming
 
PIIS086904990011468-6-1
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Sergey Korotaev 
Occupation: Trainee Researcher
Affiliation: Laboratory for Comparative Analysis of Development in PostSocialist Countries NRU HSE
Address: Malaya Pionerskaya 12, Moscow, 115054, Russia
Ovsey I. Shkaratan
Occupation: Tenured Professor, Head Laboratory, Chairman of Editorial Council
Affiliation:
NRU HSE
Journal “Universe of Russia. Sociology. Ethnology”
Address: Shabolovka 26/4, Moscow, 119049, Russia
Elena Gasiukova
Occupation: Trainee Researcher
Affiliation: Laboratory for Comparative Analysis of Development in PostSocialist Countries NRU HSE
Address: Malaya Pionerskaya 12, 115054, Moscow, Russia
Journal nameObshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost
EditionIssue 6
Pages110-122
Abstract

The article 2 (article 1 in “OSS and CW” 2017, no. 4) demonstrates factors determined the reforms’ tendencies in the Russian social policy in 1900th, manly in labor market: it’s inertness from soviet policy jointly with influence of social state models realized in the western counties mattered. It’s shown the transition from quasi-market employment relationships at early post-soviet stage to real ones were overburdened by struggle of the governing circles who tried to direct the social policy course in the most beneficial for them variant. During this period the format of social contract, labor market transformation, its competitiveness and dependence from bureaucracy were corrected which rather carried the affirmation of state monopolistic corporate capitalism in the country.

Keywordssocial policy, employment relationships, social contract, post-soviet Russia
Received12.09.2020
Publication date17.12.2017
Number of characters920
Cite   Download pdf To download PDF you should sign in
Размещенный ниже текст является ознакомительной версией и может не соответствовать печатной

views: 542

Readers community rating: votes 0 

1. Andreev S.Y. (1989) Struktura vlasti y zadachi obschestva [The government structure and the social challenges]. Neva, no. 1, pp. 144–173.
2. Boldyrev Y.Y. (2016) Kak liberaly prodavali Rossiyu: “Krysa sjest tri zernyshka, million provonyaet” [How the liberals sold Russia out: “A rat eats three grains, and million more will stink of”]. Moskovskiy komsomolets (http://www.  mk.ru/politics/2016/12/08/kak-liberaly-prodavali-rossiyu-krysa-sest-tri-zernyshka-million-provonyaet.html).
3. Burtin Y.G. (2000) Chuzhaya vlast’ [The alien authority]. Nezavisimaya gazeta (http://www.ng.ru/specfile/2000–10–13/12_vlast.html). 
4. Chervonnaya S.A., Vasilyev V.S. (2000) Politicheskaya sistema SShA: Aktual’nye izmereniya [The political system of the USA: Current measurements]. Ìoscow: Nauka.
5. Doklad o razvitii chelovecheskogo potenciala v Rossijskoi Federacii (1995) [The human potential development report in Russian Federation]. Ìoscow: Academia.
6. Doklad o razvitii chelovecheskogo potenciala v Rossijskoi Federacii (1999) [The human potential development report in Russian Federation]. Ìoscow: Academia.
7. Gaidar E.T. (1995) Gosudarstvo i evolyutsia [Government and evolution]. Ìoscow: “Evraziya”.
8. Gaidar E.T. (1992) Rossiya i reformy [Russia and reforms]. Izvestiya, no. 187, pp. 4–10.
9. Graham T. (1995) Novyi rossijskiy rejim [The new Russian regime]. Nezavisimaya gazeta. November 23, ð. 4.
10. Kolomiets V.P., Ulyukaev A.V., Shkaratan O.I. (1994) Novaya vlast’ v novoy Rossii [The new authority in the new Russia]. Ìoscow: Izdatelstvo Instituta ekonomicheskich problem perechodnogo perioda.
11. Kordanovskiy S. (2000) Rynki vlasti. Administrativnye rynki SSSR i Rossii [Market power. Administrative markets of USSR and Russia]. Mosow: O.G.I.
12. Lapidus G.W., Swanson G.Å. (eds.) (1988) State and Welfare USA/USSR. Contemporary Policy and Practice. Berkeley: University of California.
13. Mayer V.F. (1988) Planirovanie social’nogo razvitiya i povyshenie urovnya zhizni naroda [Social development planning and improvement of living standards]. Ìoscow: Izdatel’stvo Moskovskogo Universiteta.
14. Nikolaev A.I. (1995) Tekhnokraticheskaya elita i politicheskaya transformaciya [The technocratic elite and the political transformation]. Svobodnaya mysl’, no. 5, pp. 61–63.
15. Rabochiy i inzhener. Social’nye factory effektivnosti truda [A worker and an engineer. Social determinants of labor effectiveness] (1985). Ed. by O.I. Shkaratan. Ìoscow: Mysl’.
16. Radaev V.V., Shkaratan O.I. (1996) Social’naya stratifikaciya [Social stratification]. Ìoscow: Aspect-Press.
17. Rzhanitsyna L.S. (2001) Sindrom kozy [A goat syndrome]. Moskovskiye novosti, no. 3, pp. 17–23.
18. Sax J. (1995) Komu grozit korrumpirovannaya Rossiya? [Whom does the corrupted Russia threatens?]. Moskovskiye novosti, no. 87, p. 7.
19. Shmelev N.P. (1996) Pyat’ let reform – pyat’ let krizisa [Five years of reforms – five years of crisis]. Svobodnaya mysl’, no. 7, pp. 60–73.
20. Standing G. (1996) Social Protection in Central and Eastern Europe: a Tale of Slipping Anchors and Torn Safety Nets. Welfare States in Transition: National Adaptations in Global Economies. Ed. by Esping-Andersen G. London: SAGE Publications.
21. Zaslavskaya T.I. (1993) Transformatsiya rossijskogo obschestva kak predmet monitoringa [Transformation of Russian society as the subject for the monitoring]. Ekonomicheskiye i social’nye peremeny: monitoring obschestvennogo mneniya, no. 2, pp. 3–8.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up