views: 287
Readers community rating: votes 0
1. See, for example: Speech of Commissioner Oettinger at the South Stream event. Brussels, 25 May 2011 // http://eeas. europa.eu/archives/delegations/russia/documents/news/20110525_en.pdf
2. Brussels to Blow the Ukrainian Pipes. The European Commission is Opposed to Gazprom’s New Projects // Kommersant. July 16, 2015.
3. Talus K., Wustenberg M. Risks of Expending the Geographical Scope of EU Energy Law // European Energy and Environmental Law Review. October 2017.
4. Lissek U. Regulation of Nord Stream 2: Rule of Law, Equal Treatment and Due Process. A View from The Project Developer // CEPS Commentary. November, 2016. Barnes A. Dispelling the regulatory myths about Nord Stream 2. Presentation to the European Gas Conference. 22.01.2016. // http://www.theenergyexchange.co.uk/wp-content/ uploads/2016/01/Alex-Barnes-Gazprom.pdf Offenberg P. The European Neighborhood Policy and the EU’s Security of Supply with Natural Gas. // Jacques Delors Institute. January, 2016. S. 17–20.
5. Separate opinion of Judge Sir G. Fitzmaurice, para. 70 // http://www.icj-cij.org/files/case-related/50/050-19700205- JUD-01-04-EN.pdf
6. Case C-264/09 European Commission v. Slovak Republic. Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 15.11.2011 OJ. C 319/2 [2011]
7. Gudkov I.V. Judgement of the EU Court on Case “Commission v. Slovakia”: Good News for Russian Investors in the European FEC // All Europe. 2011. № 10 (59).
8. Gudkov I.V. European Union’s Competence to Regulate Relations in the Sphere of Energy // International Economic Law. 2016. № 1.