Sustainable growth and the role of artificial intelligence in improving circular economy

 
Код статьиS278229070019620-8-1
DOI10.18254/S278229070019620-8
Тип публикации Статья
Статус публикации Опубликовано
Авторы
Аффилиация: The Department of Political Science, The University of Naples Federico II
Адрес: Italy
Аффилиация: Senior advisor Consob
Адрес: Italy
Название журналаLaw & Digital Technologies
ВыпускТом 2 № 1
Страницы7-15
Аннотация

Sustainable development has three dimensions, economic, social and environmental. The three-fold dimension of sustainable development implies the consideration of the environmental issue that goes beyond mere protection of the environment since it cannot be considered separately from the economic-productive system and social needs. The circular economy operates along the same three dimensions. A central role in the successful implementation of the circular economy must necessarily be given to the enterprises. Artificial intelligence provides a powerful tool in the transition to a circular economy, acting as an instrument for innovation in the business model, by directing business activity towards sustainable capitalism, overcoming the model of capitalism aimed solely at profit.

Ключевые словаcircular economy; artificial intelligence; sustainable business model.
Получено07.04.2022
Дата публикации30.06.2022
Кол-во символов34322
Цитировать   Скачать pdf Для скачивания PDF необходимо авторизоваться
100 руб.
При оформлении подписки на статью или выпуск пользователь получает возможность скачать PDF, оценить публикацию и связаться с автором. Для оформления подписки требуется авторизация.

Оператором распространения коммерческих препринтов является ООО «Интеграция: ОН»

1

INTRODUCTION

2 Sustainable development has an economic, social, and environmental dimension. This three-fold dimension implies the consideration of the environmental issue that goes beyond mere protection of the environment since it cannot be considered separately from the economic-productive system and social needs. The circular economy can play a crucial role in the fulfillment of sustainable growth, mainly to help tackle the climate crisis by reducing GHG emissions along supply chains.
3 Whereas artificial intelligence provides a powerful tool in the transition to a circular economy, acting as an instrument for the innovation of business activities towards sustainable capitalism, overcoming the model of capitalism aimed at profit maximization only. Such a desirable path will require a new enterprise definition based on the concept of the “Sustainable business model”.
4

1. SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

5 The principle of sustainable development has its roots in the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment held in Stockholm in 1972. In fact, the first principle proclaimed as a result of the work of the Conference, states that "man has a fundamental right to freedom, equality and satisfactory living conditions in an environment which allows him to live in dignity and well-being, and he bears a high degree of responsibility for the protection and improvement of the environment for future generations", and the second principle stated that "the Earth's natural resources, including air, water, flora, fauna and especially the natural ecological system, must be safeguarded for the benefit of present and future generations through careful planning or appropriate management" (United Nation 1972).
6 The principle was reformulated in paragraph 27 of the 1987 Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development of the United Nations, entitled Our Common Future, which states that "Humanity has the ability to make development sustainable to ensure that it meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs" (Federal Office for Spatial Development ARE 1987).
7 This principle was reaffirmed by the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, held in Rio de Janeiro from 3 to 14 June 1992, according to which "human beings are at the center of concerns for sustainable development. They have the right to a healthy and productive life in harmony with nature" (United Nation 1992, 1). It was also stated that "the right to development must be realized in such a way as to equitably meet the environmental and developmental needs of present and future generations" (United Nation 1992, 2).
8 At the 2002 UN Summit on Sustainable Development in Johannesburg, the participants solemnly agreed on the following declaration: “we firmly pledge to use our rich diversity, which is our collective strength, in constructive partnerships for change and for the achievement of the common goal of sustainable development” and “we agree on the need for the private sector to operate within transparent and stable rules to strengthen corporate public accountability” (United Nation 2002).
9 In 2012, the UN organized in Rio de Janeiro the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development (UNCSD), also called Rio+20, at the end of which, the final document introduced the idea of a green economy in a context of sustainable development and poverty reduction (United Nation 2002).
10 In 2015, the UN Conference on Climate Change, held in Paris, culminated with the adoption of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, which consists of 17 objectives (OSS/SDGs, Sustainable Development Goals) and 169 targets (United Nation 2015).
11 The goals and targets, as stated in the preamble of the 2030 Agenda, "are interconnected and indivisible and balance the three dimensions of sustainable development: the economic, social and environmental dimensions" (United Nation 2015). This statement is the key to the proper implementation of the goals and targets set by Agenda 2030.
12 The principle of sustainable development became part of the Italian legal system with art. 3-quater of Legislative Decree 152/2006 and subsequent amendments, the so-called Environmental Code, which states that all human activity legally relevant under this code must comply with the principle of sustainable development, in order to ensure that the satisfaction of the needs of current generations cannot compromise the quality of life and opportunities of future generations. The principle of sustainable development becomes central in the action of the public administration pursuant paragraph 2 of the aforementioned provision, according to which in the comparative choice of public and private interests characterized by discretion, the interests of environmental protection and cultural heritage must be given priority consideration.
13

2. SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND THE SOCIO-ECONOMIC SYSTEM

14 According to international sources, sustainable development has three dimensions: economic, social and environmental (Fraccia 2010a, 2010b, 2012; Greco and Salimbeni 2003; Lomonaco 2004; Lanza 2002; Pepe 2002a, 2002b). The goals and targets are the result of the balancing of these three dimensions, therefore they are interconnected and indivisible.

всего просмотров: 278

Оценка читателей: голосов 0

1. Abriani, Niccolò, and Giulia Schneider. 2020. Il diritto societario incontra il diritto dell’informazione. IT, Corporate governance e Corporate Social Responsibility. Rivista delle società 5/6: 1326.

2. Accenture. 2017. Boost Your AIQ Transfroming into an AI Business. https://newsroom.accenture.com/news/artificial-intelligence-leaders-generate-greater-shareholder-value-finds-new-report-from-accenture-research.htm

3. Boulding, Kenneth. 1981. Evolutionary Economics. Beverly Hills.

4. Bovino, Claudio. 2014. Verso un’economia circolare: la revisione delle direttive sui rifiuti. Ambiente & sviluppo: consulenza e pratica per l'impresa e gli enti locali 10: 682-691.

5. Bifulco R., and A. D'Aloia (eds). 2008. Un diritto per il futuro. Teorie e modelli dello sviluppo sostenibile e della responsabilità intergenerazionale. Napoli: Jovene.

6. Bruno, Sabrina. 2018. Dichiarazione “non finanziaria” e obblighi degli amministratori. Rivista delle società 4: 974-1020.

7. Cavanna, Valentina. 2014. Economia verde, efficienza delle risorse ed economia circolare: il rapporto Signals 2014 dell’Agenzia europea dell’ambiente. Rivista giuridica dell'ambiente 29(6): 821-829.

8. CDP. 2020. Perseguire un modello di sviluppo circolare, anche in considerazione delle conseguenze della pandemia Covid-19, rappresenta un’opportunità di rilancio per la competitività del nostro Paese. 28 September 2020. https://www.cdp.it/sitointernet/page/it/leconomia_circolare_per_la_ripresa_italiana?contentId=PRG30512

9. Cineca. n.d. https://www.cineca.it/temi-caldi/Leonardo

10. Cocconi, Monica. 2020. La regolazione dell’economia circolare. Sostenibilità e nuovi paradigmi di sviluppo. FrancoAngeli.

11. Comandé, Giovanni. 2019. Intelligenza artificiale e responsabilità tra “liability” e “accountability”. Il carattere trasformativo dell’IA e il problema della responsabilità. Analisi Giuridica dell'Economia 1: 169-188.

12. Costanza, Robert (ed.) 1991. Ecological Economics: The Science and Management of Sustainability. Columbia University Press.

13. Council of Europe. n.d. What’s AI? https://www.coe.int/en/web/artificial-intelligence/what-is-ai

14. CSR Manager Network. 2020. Creazione di Valore e Sustainable Business Model approccio strategico alla sostenibilità. https://www.csrmanagernetwork.it/files/DOCUMENTI/CRF_Creazione_di_valore_e_SBM_191020.pdf

15. Dallocchio, Maurizio, Leonella Gori and Emanuele Teti. n.d. I Modelli di business dell’economia circolare. https://rivista.microcredito.gov.it/opinioni/archivio-opinioni/763-i-modelli-di-business-dell%E2%80%99economia-circolare.html

16. De Leonardis, Francesco. 2017. Economia circolare: saggio sui suoi diversi aspetti giuridici. Verso uno Stato circolare. Diritto amministrativo 25(1): 163-207.

17. De Leonardis, Francesco, ed. 2019. Studi in tema di economia circolare. EUM-Edizioni Università di Macerata.

18. De Leonardis, Francesco. 2020. Il diritto dell'economia circolare e l'art. 41 della Costituzione. Rivista Quadrimestrale di Diritto dell’Ambiente 1: 50-72.

19. Di Vaioa, Assunta, Rosa Palladinoa, Rohail Hassanb, and Octavio Escobar. 2020. Artificial intelligence and business models in the sustainable development goals perspective: A systematic literature review. Journal of Business Research 121: 283-314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.08.019

20. Enriques, Luca, and Dirk A. Zetzsche. 2020. Corporate Technologies and the Tech Nirvana Fallacy. Hastings Law Journal 72(1): 55-98.

21. Ellen MacArthur Foundation. Completing the picture. How the circular economy tackles climate change. 2019. https://emf.thirdlight.com/link/dcijanpohgkd-oblthh/@/preview/5

22. Evan, William, and Edward R. Freeman. 1988. A stakeholder theory of the modern corporation: kantian capitalism. In Ethical theory and business. Tom L. Beauchamp, Norman E Bowie (eds.). Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.

23. European Commission. 2011. A renewed EU Strategy 2011-14 on Corporate Social Responsibility. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2011:0681:FIN:EN:PDF

24. European Commission. 2014. The Circular Economy. Connecting, Generating and Retaining Value. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/c8cfd1ae-6285-40ba-879f-f2e78e4c2b6e

25. European Commission. 2020. A new Circular Economy Action Plan. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?qid=1583933814386&uri=COM:2020:98:FIN

26. European Commission. 2020. White paper on artificial intelligence - A European approach to excellence and trust. https://ec.europa.eu/info/publications/white-paper-artificial-intelligence-european-approach-excellence-and-trust_en

27. Federal Office for Spatial Development ARE. Brundtland Report 1987. https://www.are.admin.ch/are/it/home/sviluppo-sostenibile/cooperazione-internazionale/agenda2030/onu-_-le-pietre-miliari-dello-sviluppo-sostenibile/1987--rapporto-brundtland.html

28. Ferrara, Rosario. 2018. Brown economy, green economy, blue economy: l’economia circolare e il diritto dell’ambiente. Diritto e processo amministrativo 12(3): 801-835.

29. Finn, Ed. 2017. What Algorithms Want, Imagination in the Age of Computing. MIT Press.

30. Fortunato, Sabino. 2019. L'informazione non-finanziaria nell'impresa socialmente responsabile. Giurisprudenza commerciale 46(3): 415 – 428.

31. Fraccia, Fabrizio. 2010. Sviluppo sostenibile e diritti delle generazioni future. Rivista Quadrimestrale di Diritto dell’Ambiente 0: 15.

32. Fraccia, Fabrizio. 2010. Lo sviluppo sostenibile. La voce flebile dell’altro fra protezione dell’ambiente e tutela della specie umana. Napoli: Editoriale Scientifica.

33. Fraccia, Fabrizio. 2012. “Il principio dello sviluppo sostenibile.” In Studi sui principi di diritto amministrativo, edited by Mauro Renna, Fabio Saitta. Milano: Giuffrè.

34. Freeman, Edward R., Jeffrey S. Harrison, and Stelios Zyglidopoulos. 2018. Stakeholder Theory: Concepts and Strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

35. Georgescu-Roegen, Nicholas. 1998. Bioeconomia. Verso un'altra economia ecologicamente e socialmente sostenibile. Bollati Boringhieri.

36. Georgescu-Roegen, Nicholas. 2003. Bioeconomia Verso un'altra economia ecologicamente e socialmente sostenibile. Mauro Bonaiuti (ed.). Bollati Boringhieri.

37. Goodman, James, and Ariel Salleh. 2013. The ‘Green Economy’: Class Hegemony and Counter-Hegemony. Globalizations 10 (3): 411-424, https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2013.787770;

38. Greco, Pietro, and Antonio Pollio Salimbeni. 2003. Lo sviluppo sostenibile: dal vertice di Rio a quello di Johannesburg. Milano: B. Mondadaori.

39. Johnston, Andrew. 2011. Facing Up to Social Cost The Real Meaning of Corporate Social Responsibility. Griffith Law Review 20(1): 221- 224.

40. Joshi, Naveen. 2019. “How IoT and AI Can Enable Environmental Sustainability”. Forbes, 4 September 2019.

41. Kaplan, Jerry. 2018. Intelligenza artificiale Guida al futuro prossimo. Luiss Università Press.

42. Keay, Andrew R. 2011. The corporate objective. Edward Elgar Publishing.

43. Lacy, Peter, Beatrice Lamonica, and Jakob Rutqvist. 2016. Circular Economy Dallo spreco al valore. Egea.

44. Lanza, Alessandro. 2002. Lo sviluppo sostenibile. Bologna: Il Mulino.

45. Lomonaco, Raffaele. 2004. Sviluppo sostenibile e difesa dei diritti umani. Roma.

46. Mattei, Ugo. 2011. Beni comuni. Un manifesto. Roma-Bari: Laterza.

47. Millon, David. 2013. Radical shareholder primacy. Un. St. Thomas L. J. 10(4): 1013-1044;

48. Moliterni, Alfredo. 2020. La sfida ambientale e il ruolo dei pubblici poteri in campo ambientale. Rivista Quadrimestrale di Diritto dell’Ambiente 2: 32-71.

49. Montagnani, Maria L. 2020. Intelligenza artificiale e governance della “nuova” grande impresa azionaria: potenzialità e questioni endoconsiliari. Rivista delle società 65(4): 1003.

50. Mosco, Gian Domenico. 2019. Roboboard. L’intelligenza artificiale nei consigli di amministrazione. Analisi Giuridica dell'Economia 1: 247-260.

51. Munda, Giuseppe. 1997. Economia ambientale, economia ecologica e concetto di sviluppo sostenibile. Valori ambientali 6(2): 213-233.

52. Pauli, Gunter. 2015. Blue economy 2.0. Milano: Edizioni Ambiente.

53. Pellegrini, Carlo Bellavite, Maurizio Dallocchio, and Enrico Parazzini. 2020. Valutazione d'azienda nel mondo ESG. Milano: Egea.

54. Pepe, Vincenzo. 2002. Lo sviluppo sostenibile tra diritto internazionale e diritto interno. In Rivista giuridica dell'ambiente 17(2): 209-243.

55. Pepe, Vincenzo. 2002. Lo sviluppo sostenibile tra governo dell’economia e profili costituzionali. Piacenza: La Tribuna.

56. Scotti, Elisa. 2019. Poteri pubblici, sviluppo sostenibile ed economia circolare. Il diritto dell’economia 1: 493 -529.

57. Sjåfjell, Beate, and Christopher M. Bruner. 2020. Corporate law, corporate governance e sustainability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

58. Strine, Jr., Leo E. 2019. Toward Fair and Sustainable Capitalism. SSRN. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3461924

59. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 2018. Artificial Intelligence. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/artificial-intelligence

60. Stile, Maria T. 2015. Da economia lineare a economia circolare: la strategia dell’Unione europea e l’anello mancante. Rivista giuridica dell'ambiente 30(4): 647-654.

61. Stout, Lynn A. 2012. The shareholder value myth. San Francisco: Berret-Koehler Publishers.

62. UNDESA (Division for sustainable development), A Guidebook to Green Economy, 2012.

63. United Nation, The Stockholm Declaration 1972, https://www.un.org/en/conferences/environment/stockholm1972

64. United Nation, The Rio Declaration on Development and the Environment 1992, https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/generalassembly/docs/globalcompact/A_CONF.151_26_Vol.I_Declaration.pdf

65. United Nation, The Johannesburg Declaration on Sustainable Development. From our origins to the future 2002, https://www.un.org/esa/sustdev/documents/WSSD_POI_PD/English/POI_PD.htm

66. United Nation, The further we want 2012, https://www.minambiente.it/sites/default/files/archivio/allegati/rio_20/the_future_we_want_english.pdf

67. United Nation, The Paris Agreement 2015, https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-paris-agreement/the-paris-agreement

68. Vinuesa, Ricardo, Hossein Azizpour, Iolanda Leite, Madeline Balaam, Virginia Dignum, Sami Domisch, Anna Felländer, Simone Daniela Langhans, Max Tegmark, and Francesco Fuso Nerini. 2020. The role of artificial intelligence in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. Nat Commun 11: 233. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-14108-y

69. Webster, Ken. 2017. The circular economy. A wealth of flows. Ellen MacArthur Foundation Publishing.

Система Orphus

Загрузка...
Вверх