1. Dolya E.V. Sudebnyj protsess za pravo vladeniya Svyato-Nikolaevskim kafedral'nym soborom v N'yu-Jorke v otrazhenii dokumentov GARF (1947-1950 gg.) // Istoriya i arkhivy. 2019. №4. S. 39-59.
2. Irkhin I.V. Ogovorka o publichnom poryadke kak instrument razresheniya kollizij mezhdu svetskim i religioznym pravom v SShA // Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. 2021. №7. S. 70 - 75.
3. Berg T. C., Fouch N.M., Money E. Credentials Not Required: Why an Employee’s Significant Religious Functions Should Suffice to Trigger the Ministerial Exception. 2020 // Federalist Society Review. 2019. Volume 20 (182). P. 182-191.
4. Evans C. M., Hood A. Religious Autonomy and Labour Law: A Comparison of Jurisprudence of the United States and the European Court of Human Rights // Oxford Journal of Law and Religion. 2012. Vol. 1, is. 1. P. 1-27.
5. Lund S. S. In Defense of the Ministerial Exception // North Carolina Law Review. 2011. Vol. 90. P. 1-71.
6. McLoughlin W. G. New England Dissent 1630-1833: The Baptists and the Separation of Church and State 351. Harvard University Press. 1971. 693 p.
7. Slotte P., Årsheim H. The Ministerial Exception – Comparative Perspectives. Oxford Journal of Law and Religion. Volume 4. Issue 2. 2015. P. 171–198.