Non-traditional types of storage or pre-trial provision of digital evidence in civil proceedings

 
PIIS102694520018317-9-1
DOI10.31857/S102694520018317-9
Publication type Article
Status Approved
Authors
 
Affiliation: Tashkent State University of Law
Abstract

The article describes the specific procedural aspects of providing pre-trial digital evidence using blockchain technology and timestamps. This article describes the concepts of blockchain and timestamp. It also turned out that blockchain technology and timestamping make it possible to provide digital evidence to a notary public before trial. Notarial certification, which has become a means of preventing the falsification of electronic documents, is rarely used in legal practice, since it has been shown that notarization of electronic evidence requires additional time and money from the parties.

However, when comparing the provision of digital evidence with the traditional method of notarization, it is stated that the storage of evidence based on the blockchain is almost never carried out by the parties.

Blockchain claims that ensuring the authenticity and reliability of digital evidence in the aggregate will increase the effectiveness of their evaluation in courts. At the discretion of one of the parties, it is indicated that changing and adding (falsifying and deleting) documents based on blockchain technology is impossible.

The article states that preparing digital evidence in a blockchain program or timestamping digital evidence is important to ensure the acceptability of digital evidence.

Keywords: blockchain, timestamp, digital evidence, notary public, provision of evidence
Received20.01.2022
Number of characters15441
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up