Disputed issues of competence of the bankruptcy trustee in bankruptcy of credit organizations

 
PIIS013207690009237-2-1
DOI10.31857/S013207690009237-2
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: Chief researcher of the Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Affiliation: Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Occupation: Professor of the Department of business law, faculty of law, Lomonosov Moscow state University
Affiliation: Lomonosov Moscow state University
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Journal nameGosudarstvo i pravo
EditionIssue 4
Pages76-86
Abstract

Тhe purpose of this article is to assess the authority of the bankruptcy Trustee (Deposit Insurance Agency) to challenge the transactions of a debtor – a credit institution that is in bankruptcy. Current legislation and practice provide a basis for discussion as to whether such power is the bounden duty of the bankruptcy trustee, or the administrator has the ability to waive the claim. The authors examine the features of the bankruptcy trustee's legal position, the current judicial practice and make a clear conclusion: in accordance with the current legislation, including taking into account the meaning given to it by the legal positions of the courts, challenging the debtor's transactions is the duty of the bankruptcy trustee. This conclusion, in particular, arises from the fact that the Deposit Insurance Agency performs the functions of a bankruptcy trustee by law and is obliged to protect public interests. When making a decision to appeal transactions, the bankruptcy trustee must act in good faith and reasonably, comparing the economic effect of invalidating the transaction with the costs of challenging it. There is a need to improve the legal position of the Deposit Insurance Agency in terms of performing its functions as a bankruptcy trustee of credit organizations.

Keywordsthe arbitration manager, bankruptcy trustee, Deposit Insurance Agency, suspicious transactions, transactions with a preference for, invalidity of transactions, liability
Received03.02.2020
Publication date11.06.2020
Number of characters44755
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 886

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Borzenkova E. Agency for a trillion: what and how the DIA is suing. URL: https://pravo.ru/story/208636/ 12.02.2019 (accessed: 26.01.2020) (in Russ.).

2. Gabov A.V. Reorganization and liquidation of legal entities: scientific and practical commentary on articles 57 - 65 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation (article-by-article). M., 2014. P. 185–187 (in Russ.).

3. Zhukova Yu. D. Responsibility of the head of an economic company under Russian law. M., 2016. P. 118, 119 (in Russ.).

4. Isaev Yu. We have to always proceed from the suspicion that there is fraud. URL: https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/4205716?from=main_8 / 24.12.2019 (accessed: 26.01.2020) (in Russ.).

5. Insolvency (bankruptcy): studies course: in 2 vols. / ed. by S.A. Karelina. Vol. 1. M., 2019. Pp 770, 778 (in Russ.).

6. Tarasov S. The Agency on insurance of contributions attracts scandals. URL: https://wek.ru/asv-idet-na-podryv / 21.02.2018 (accessed: 26.01.2020) (in Russ.).

7. Frolov I.V. Influence of the legal structure of reasonable doubt in the integrity and reasonableness of the mechanisms of removal and release of competitive managers // Laws of Russia: experience, analysis, practice. 2012. No. 12. P. 55 - 61 (in Russ.).

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up