Consequences of convergence of the private sector and public law in the field of protection of subjective rights

Occupation: Acting head of Department. sector of Civil Law, civil and arbitration process, chief researcher of the Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Affiliation: Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow

Yulia S. Kharitonova

Occupation: Professor of Entrepreneurial Law Department at the Faculty of Law of Lomonosov Moscow state University (MSU); chief researcher of the Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Affiliation:
Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Lomonosov Moscow state University (MSU)
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow

Journal name

Gosudarstvo i pravo

Edition

Issue 4

Pages

58-67

Abstract

The Current state of protection of the rights and legitimate interests of citizens in the private legal sphere is characterized by a wide use of public legal methods of protection. Such phenomenon of interpenetration of private and public norms in legal science is designated as convergence of private and public law. Improving the effectiveness of the protection of the rights and legitimate interests of citizens is impossible without a balanced combination of private and public legal means of protection. The development of the theory of convergence of private and public law at the present stage is most fully manifested in the sphere of protection of subjective rights. It is within the framework of this theory that an optimal balance can be found between private law and public law methods of protecting the violated rights of citizens.

Keywords

convergence of private and public law; socialization of private law; consumer rights protection; out-of-court methods of protection; mediation

Received

14.01.2020

Publication date

11.06.2020

Number of characters

35662

Cite

GOST	Sannikova L., Kharitonova Y. Consequences of convergence of the private sector and public law in the field of protection of subjective rights // Gosudarstvo i pravo – 2020. – Issue 4 C. 58-67 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://gospravo-journal.ru/S013207690009235-0-1 (circulation date: 26.04.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S013207690009235-0
MLA	Sannikova, Larisa V, Kharitonova, Yulia S "Consequences of convergence of the private sector and public law in the field of protection of subjective rights." Gosudarstvo i pravo 4 (2020):58-67. DOI: 10.31857/S013207690009235-0
APA	Sannikova L., Kharitonova Y. (2020). Consequences of convergence of the private sector and public law in the field of protection of subjective rights. Gosudarstvo i pravo (4), pp.58-67 DOI: 10.31857/S013207690009235-0

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 1, views: 1107

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Bazedov Yu. European civil society and its law: on the issue of defining private law in the community // Bulletin of Civil Law. Vol. 8. 2008. No. 1. P. 225–242 (in Russ.).
2. Baratova M.A. Formation of housing law in Russia // Family and Housing Law. 2011. No. 4. P. 40 - 42 (in Russ.).
3. Barkov A.V. Problems of socialization of private law and legislation // Concept of private and public law of Russia: the ABC of private law. M., 2014. P. 91 - 115 (in Russ.).
4. Belikova K.M. Contract law of the BRICS countries: the experience of Brazil in the light of a new paradigm for building private law regulation // The questions Russ. International Law. 2012. No. 9, 10. P. 58 - 85 (in Russ.).
5. Valeev D. Kh., Vaskevich V. P., Chelyshev M. Yu. Comment to the Law of the Russian Federation "On protection of consumer rights" (article by article) / ed. by M. Yu. Chelyshev. M., 2002 (in Russ.).
6. Consumer protection in the Russian Federation in 2018: State report. M., 2019. P. 18. 19 (in Russ.).
7. Korshunov N.M. Convergence of private and public law: problems of theory and practice. M., 2011. P. 240 (in Russ.).
8. Leskova Yu. G. Self-regulating organization as a legal model of implementation and development of social entrepreneurship // Lawyer. 2013. No. 11. P. 13–17 (in Russ.).
9. Matveev M.M. Questions of the economic essence of socialization of the market economy // Economics, entrepreneurship and law. 2011.  No. 8. P. 21–25 (in Russ.).
10. Legal support of social entrepreneurship: textbook. aid for undergraduates / A.V. Barkov, Ya. S. Grishina, O.A. Zolotov [et al.]; under the editorship of S. Yu. Morozov. Ulyanovsk, 2019 (in Russ.).
11. Pushkina T.N. The concept and meaning of mediation // Herald of Udmurt state University. Ser. "Economics and law". Vol. 27. Vol. 3. 2017. P. 160 (in Russ.).
12. Sannikova L.V., Kharitonova Yu. S. Protection of the rights of patent holders in the event of a conflict of patents for medicinal products // Herald of Perm University. The legal of sciences. Vol. 43. 2019. No. 1. P. 121–145 (in Russ.).
13. Solovyov V.N. Social function of civil law regulation of property relations: abstract ... Doctor of Law. M., 2013 (in Russ.).
14. Sukhanov E.A. Real law: scientific and educational essay. M., 2017 (in Russ.).
15. Timofeeva S.V. Socialization of housing law: problems of choosing priorities // Military law journal. 2007. No. 5. P. 13 (in Russ.).
16. Kharitonova Yu. S. Realisation of a citizen's property in the course of bankruptcy procedures // Civil Law. 2016. No. 3. P. 41 - 43 (in Russ.).
17. Shamlikashvili Ts. A. Mediation is a modern method of non-judicial dispute resolution. M., 2017. P. 21 (in Russ.).
18. Cheung A.Y. Private Law for Public Ends. 2019, September 9. URL: https://doi.org/10.31228/osf.io/mb2h6;°https://www.researchgate.net/publication/335708479_Private_Law_for_Public_Ends/related;  Meinel F. The lawyer in industrial society. Ernst Forsthoff and his time. Berlin, 2011.
19. Harlow C. Law and public administration: convergence and symbiosis // International Review of Administrative Sciences.2005. Volume: 71 issue: 2, page(s): 279-294. URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852305053886 
20. Löhnig M. The “Social Function of Property” in German Law // In: Babie P., Viven-Wilksch J. (eds) Léon Duguit and the Social Obligation Norm of Property. Springer, Singapore. 2019.
21. McLean, Janet M. Convergence in Public and Private Law Doctrines - The Case of Public Contracts (November 14, 2015). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2690935  or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2690935 
22. Negü A. Social economy, social capital and local development // Calitatea Vietii 2013(2):195-212. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/288452624_Social_economy_social_capital_and_local_development 
23. Nishikawa Jun. The theoretical framework of social economy/economie sociale // Waseda Economic Papers. 1996. 35. Р. 53 – 63. URL: http://hdl.handle.net/2065/6138//https://waseda.repo.nii.ac.jp/?action=pages_view_main&active_action=repository_view_main_item_detail&item_id=6642&item_no=1&page_id=13&block_id=21 
24. Sue Arrow smith “An Assessment of the New Legislative Package on Public Procurement” (2004) 41 CMLR 1277.
25. Whittaker S. Introduction to the Private and Public Laws of Liability in France. 2005. Print ISBN-13: 9780198256137. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198256137.003.0002.