System of legal liability as object of scientific research

The article is presents to the study of the system of legal liability as an independent legal category and object of scientific research. The scientific approaches (species, normative, instrumental and integrative), as well as levels of cognition (content, structural and self-system) of the system of legalliability are disclosed, and its subsystems (normative, procedural and organizational) are named and characterized. In describing the process of development of legal liability, the stages of legal regulation take into account its basic incarnations (in an objective and subjective sense), systemic properties and grounds for occurrence. The problems, prospects and possible ways of further studying the system of legal liability with references to doctrinal and official sources are indicated.

Keywords

system of legal liability, scientific approaches, legal practice, levels of cognition, subsystems of legal liability, legal liability in an objective sense, subjective legal liability, basis of liability, stage of development of legal liability

Received

14.11.2018

Publication date

14.11.2018

Cite Download pdf To download PDF you should sign in

GOST	Kuz'min I. System of legal liability as object of scientific research // Gosudarstvo i pravo – 2018. – Issue 10 C. 61-70 [Electronic resource]. URL: http://ras.jes.su/gp/s013207690002074-3-1-en (circulation date: 18.04.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S013207690002074-3
MLA	Kuz'min, I. "System of legal liability as object of scientific research." Gosudarstvo i pravo 10 (2018):61-70. DOI: 10.31857/S013207690002074-3
APA	Kuz'min I. (2018). System of legal liability as object of scientific research. Gosudarstvo i pravo (10), pp.61-70 DOI: 10.31857/S013207690002074-3

Price publication: 0

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 1136

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Chuklova E.V. Protsessual'naya otvetstvennost' v sisteme yuridicheskoj otvetstvennosti // Vektor nauki TGU. Ser. “Yuridicheskie nauki”. 2013. № 4. S. 68.

2. Mongush A.L. Ponyatie, mesto i tseli administrativno-pravovoj otvetstvennosti v sisteme yuridicheskoj otvetstvennosti // Sovremennoe pravo. 2007. № 12-1. S. 50.

3. Mescheryakova S.N. Grazhdansko-pravovaya i finansovaya otvetstvennost' v sisteme yuridicheskoj otvetstvennosti (sootnoshenie ponyatij) // Filosofiya prava. 2011. № 6. S. 23.

4. Kapitsa S.P., Kurdyumov S.P., Malinetskij G.G. Sinergetika i prognozy buduschego. 3-e izd. M., 2003.

5. Lukasheva E.A. Prava cheloveka i protsessy transformatsii v sovremennom mire // Trudy IGP RAN. 2016. № 3. S. 130.

6. Alekseev I.A. Mesto munitsipal'no-pravovoj otvetstvennosti v sisteme yuridicheskoj otvetstvennosti // Izvestiya vuzov. Severo-Kavkazskij region. Ser. “Obschestvennye nauki”. 2005. № 53. S. 85.

7. Lisitsyn-Svetlanov A.G. Realizatsiya ehkonomicheskikh reform v prave // Trudy IGP RAN. 2012. № 5. S. 19.

8. Usenko Yu.N. Problemy pravoprimeneniya v sfere yuridicheskoj otvetstvennosti organov publichnoj vlasti // Vestnik Baltijskogo feder. un-ta im. I. Kanta. Ser. “Gumanitarnye i obschestvennye nauki”. 2014. № 9. S. 76.