Factors influencing the perception of corruption (a multilevel analysis in Africa)

 
PIIS032150750021786-6-1
DOI10.31857/S032150750021787-7
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: Post-graduate student
Affiliation: Doctoral School of Political Science, HSE University
Address: Russian Federation, Москва
Journal nameAsia and Africa Today
EditionIssue 9
Pages70-76
Abstract

Many developing countries suffer high levels of corruption, which contributes to the divergence in economic development between more developed and developing countries. Corruption perceptions play a key role in forming a culture that is more or less tolerant of corruption, which contributes to its persistence. Individuals who have high perception of corruption believe that bribes must be paid. Customers will be more likely to accept a bribe if they believe many people pay bribes. The importance of this research is that it contributes to the micro-level research tradition by providing a deeper understanding of the factors that influence corruption perception.

What factors influence the perception of corruption? I conducted an empirical analysis using 2017 Afrobarometer survey data, focusing on 34 democratic African countries. The study finds that those who are relatively poor are more likely to have a high perception of corruption and develop an unfavorable view of corruption than those with high income. The study also provides the potential mechanisms involved in the perception of corruption, finding that individuals with high access to information through the media, and higher education have a higher perception of corruption.

KeywordsAfrica, corruption, corruption perception, government, poverty, media
Received18.04.2022
Publication date13.09.2022
Number of characters24293
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 244

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Mlambo D.N., Mubecua M.A., Mpanza S.E., Mlambo V.H. 2019. Corruption and its implications for development and good governance: A perspective from post-colonial Africa. Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies. Vol. 11, № 6, pp. 39-47.

2. Bratton M., Mattes R. and Gyimah-Boadi E. 2005. Public opinion, democracy, and market reform in Africa. Cambridge University Press.

3. Villoria M., Van Ryzin G.G., Lavena C.F. 2013. Social and political consequences of administrative corruption: A study of public perceptions in Spain. Public Administration Review. Vol. 73, № 1, pp. 85-94.

4. Mauro M.P. 1996. The Effects of Corruption on Growth, Investment, and Government Expenditure. International Monetary Fund.

5. Wei S.J., Shleifer A. 2000. Local corruption and global capital flows. Brookings papers on economic activity. Vol. 2000, № 12, pp. 303-354.

6. Olken B.A. 2009. Corruption perceptions vs. corruption reality. Journal of Public economics. Vol. 93, № 7-8, pp. 950-964.

7. de Lancer Julnes P., Villoria M. 2014. Understanding and addressing citizens’ perceptions of corruption: The case of Spain. International Review of Public Administration. Vol. 19, № 1, pp. 23-43.

8. Cabelkova I. 2001. Perceptions of Corruption in Ukraine: Are they correct? CERGE-EI working paper series. № 176.

9. Johnston M. 1986. Right & wrong in American politics: Popular conceptions of corruption. Polity. Vol. 18, № 3, pp. 367-391.

10. Treisman D. 2000. The causes of corruption: a cross-national study. Journal of public economics. Vol. 76. № 3, pp. 399-457.

11. Bardhan P. 1997. Corruption and development: a review of issues. Political Corruption. Vol. 35, pp. 1320-1346.

12. Tanzi V., 1998. Corruption around the world: Causes, consequences, scope, and cures. Staff papers, Vol. 45, № 4, pp. 559-594.

13. Luo Y., 2005. An organizational perspective of corruption1. Management and Organization Review. Vol. 1, № 1, pp. 119-154.

14. Gyimah-Boadi E. 2002. Confronting corruption in Ghana and Africa. Ghana Center for Democratic Development. Vol. 4, № 2.

15. Acemoglu D., Johnson S., Robinson J.A. 2001. The colonial origins of comparative development: An empirical investigation. American economic review, Vol. 91, № 5, pp. 1369-1401.

16. Dreher A., Herzfeld T. 2005. The economic costs of corruption: a survey and new evidence.

17. Mironov M. 2005. Bad corruption, good corruption and growth. University of Chicago. Miméo.

18. Shleifer A., Vishny R.W. 1993. Corruption. The quarterly journal of economics. Vol. 108, № 3, pp. 599-617.

19. Rose-Ackerman S., Palifka B.J. 2016. Corruption and government: Causes, consequences, and reform. Cambridge university press.

20. Damania R., Fredriksson P.G., Mani M. 2004. The persistence of corruption and regulatory compliance failures: theory and evidence. Public choice. Vol. 121, № 3, pp. 363-390.

21. Tanzi V. 1998. Corruption around the world: Causes, consequences, scope, and cures. Staff papers. Vol. 45, № 4, pp. 559-594.

22. Rose-Ackerman S. 1997. The political economy of corruption. Corruption and the global economy. Vol. 31, № 60, p. 54.

23. Seleim A., Bontis N. 2009. The relationship between culture and corruption: A cross‐national study. Journal of Intellectual Capital. Vol. 10, № 1, pp. 165-184.

24. Setyobudi C.R., Setyaningrum D. 2019. E-government and corruption perception index: a cross-country study. Journal Akuntansi dan Auditing Indonesia. Vol. 23, № 1, pp. 11-20.

25. Znoj H. 2017. Deep corruption in Indonesia: discourses, practices, histories. Corruption and the Secret of Law. Routledge. Pp. 53-74.

26. Blundo G., De Sardan JPO. 2001. Everyday Corruption in West Africa. African Politics. Vol. 3, pp. 8-37.

27. Easterly W., Levine R. 1997. Africa’s growth tragedy: policies and ethnic divisions. The quarterly journal of economics. Vol. 112, № 4, pp. 1203-1250.

28. Collier P., Hoeffler A. 2002. On the incidence of civil war in Africa. Journal of conflict resolution. Vol. 46, № 1, pp. 13-28.

29. Anderson C.J., Tverdova Y.V. 2003. Corruption, political allegiances, and attitudes toward government in contemporary democracies. American journal of political science. Vol. 47, № 1, pp. 91-109.

30. Persson A., Rothstein B., Teorell J. 2013. Why anticorruption reforms fail - systemic corruption as a collective action problem. Governance. Vol. 26, № 3, pp. 449-471.

31. Gupta S., Davoodi H., Alonso-Terme R. 2002. Does corruption affect income inequality and poverty? Economics of governance. Vol. 3, № 1, pp. 23-45.

32. Justesen M.K., Bjørnskov C. 2014. Exploiting the poor: Bureaucratic corruption and poverty in Africa. World Development. Vol. 58, pp. 106-115.

33. McCombs M.E., Shaw D.L. 1993. The evolution of agenda-setting research: Twenty-five years in the marketplace of ideas. Journal of communication. Vol. 43, № 2, pp. 58-67.

34. Costas-Pérez E., Ollé A.S., Navarro P.S., 2011. Corruption scandals, press reporting, and accountability: Evidence from Spanish mayors. Documents de treball IEB. № 9, pp. 1.

35. Glaeser E.L., Gyourko J., Saks R. 2005. Why is Manhattan so expensive? Regulation and the rise in housing prices. The Journal of Law and Economics. Vol. 48, № 2, pp. 331-369.

36. Melgar N., Rossi M., Smith T.W. 2010. The perception of corruption in a cross-country perspective: Why are some individuals more perceptive than others? Economia Aplicada. Vol. 14, № 2, pp. 183-198.

37. Kim S. 2010. Public trust in government in Japan and South Korea: Does the rise of critical citizens matter? Public Administration Review. Vol. 70, № 5, pp. 801-810.

38. Gyimah-Boadi E. 1994. Ghana’s uncertain political opening. Journal of Democracy. Vol. 5, № 2, pp. 75-86.

39. Glaeser E.L., Gyourko J., Saks R. 2005. Why is Manhattan so expensive? Regulation and the rise in housing prices. The Journal of Law and Economics. Vol. 48, № 2, pp. 331-369.

40. Maeda K., Ziegfeld A. 2015. Socioeconomic status and corruption perceptions around the world. Research & Politics. Vol. 2, № 2, Pp. 1-9.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up