South China sea in confrontation between China and the United States in asia

Occupation: Lecturer, Higher School of Economics and Kyonggi University (South Korea)’s Double Degree Program - “Economics and Politics in Asia”; Post-graduate student, RUDN
Affiliation:
National Research University Higher School of Economics
RUDN University
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow

Ellina P. Shavlay

Occupation: Analyst at the Laboratory of International Trends Analysis, Lecturer at English Department №1, PhD Student in History
Affiliation: Moscow State Institute of International Relations (MGIMO-University)
Address: Rechnikov, 18/2, ap. 26

Journal name

Asia and Africa Today

Edition

Issue 7

Pages

61-66

Abstract

South China Sea is a negligible sea that is a part of the Pacific Ocean. There are both island and maritime claims among several states of the region, such as China, Taiwan, Vietnam, Philippines, Malaysia, Brunei, and Indonesia. In this regard, the tensions arise primarily between China and the countries pertaining to the disputed territories. On the other hand, as most of the states concerned are members of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) the conflict of interests has implications for China-ASEAN relations.

However, the key rivals contesting each other’s presence in South China Sea are the People’s Republic of China (PRC) and the United States of America (USA). The two actors provide different reasoning for their strategies in the region: while the Chinese generally apply to historical arguments to confirm their claims, Americans tend to advance international law and the rules-based order, thus delegitimizing China’s steps towards the islands. Given that competition between Beijing and Washington has far- reaching consequences for the entire Asia-Pacific, or even larger Indo-Pacific region, their relations in South China Sea require increasingly closer examination as they lie in the turf war domain.

As such, the paper explores territorial disputes by studying China’s position as well as analyzing the US attempts to counter Chinese expansionism which results in weakening the already strained American leadership in Asia. The authors conclude that the main goal of the Chinese government today is to anchor its authority in South China Sea by constraining other countries to concede, whereas the US seeks to undermine the PRC efforts through deterrence and pressure.

Keywords

South China Sea, China, United States, territorial disputes, spheres of influence, Asia Pacific

Publication date

27.08.2020

Number of characters

19418

Cite

GOST	Vasiliev D., Shavlay E. South China sea in confrontation between China and the United States in asia // Asia and Africa Today – 2020. – Issue 7 C. 61-66 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://asaf-today.ru/S032150750010107-9-1 (circulation date: 18.04.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S032150750010107-9
MLA	Vasiliev, Dmitry V, Shavlay, Ellina P "South China sea in confrontation between China and the United States in asia." Asia and Africa Today 7 (2020):61-66. DOI: 10.31857/S032150750010107-9
APA	Vasiliev D., Shavlay E. (2020). South China sea in confrontation between China and the United States in asia. Asia and Africa Today (7), pp.61-66 DOI: 10.31857/S032150750010107-9

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 820

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. 2010. Territorial disputes in the South China Sea. “Greater East Asia”: World Politics and Regional Transformations: a Scientific and Educational Complex / Ed. A.D.Voskresensky. M. (In Russ.)

2. Ramos R. Trump vows free and open Indo-Pacific region. Anadolu Agency. 14 November 2014. https://www.aa.com.tr/en/americas/trump-vows-free-and-open-indo-pacific-region/964636 (accessed 24.03.2020)

3. Peace Treaty with Japan, signed at San Francisco on September 8, 1951. Ch. II, Art. 2, par. f. Russian State Archive of the Navy (In Russ.). https://rgavmf.ru/sites/default/files/lib/sf_dogovor_1951_text.pdf (accessed 23.03.2020)

4. Island Features of the South China Sea. Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative. https://amti.csis.org/scs-features-map/ (accessed 01.04.2020)

5. Limits in the Seas. Bureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific Affairs, United States Department of State, p. 3. https://2009-2017.state.gov/documents/organization/234936.pdf (accessed 01.04.2020)

6. US Navy: Beijing creating a ‘great wall of sand’ in South China Sea. The Guardian. 31 March 2015. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/mar/31/china-great-wall-sand-spratlys-us-navy (accessed 28.03.2020)

7. Beijing rejects tribunal’s ruling in South China Sea case. The Guardian, 12 July 2016. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/jul/12/philippines-wins-south-china-sea-case-against-china (accessed 12.03.2020)

8. Vietnam calls for restraint in South China Sea after months of tensions with Beijing. South China Morning Post, 15 October 2019. https://www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy/article/3033086/vietnam-calls-restraint-south-china-seaafter-months-tensions (accessed 18.03.2020)

9. Vu K., Pearson J. Vietnam urges restraint amid maritime tensions with China. Reuters, 15 October 2019. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-vietnam-southchinasea/vietnam-urges-restraint-amid-maritime-tensions-with-chinaidUSKBN1WU1CR (accessed 24.03.2020)

10. Kolotov V.N. 2019. Disputes in the South China Sea and Internal Political Situation in Vietnam. Asia and Africa today. № 7 (In Russ.). https://asaf-today.ru/images/AA_nomers/2019/201907/Kolotov-Spory.pdf (accessed 29.03.2020)

11. Hill G., China and Philippines: The reasons why a battle for Zhongye (Pag-asa) Island seems unavoidable. China News,

12. January, 2014. https://chinanewsstories.com/2014/01/13/the-reasons-why-a-battle-for-zhongye-pag-asa-island-seemsunavoidable/ (accessed 28.03.2020)

13. Phillips T., Holmes O., Bowcott O. Beijing rejects tribunal’s ruling in South China Sea case. The Guardian, 12 July 2016. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/jul/12/philippines-wins-south-china-sea-case-against-china (accessed 01.04.2020)

14. Philippines strengthens claim on this South China Sea island. The Star, 20 August 2019. https://www.thestar. com.my/lifestyle/travel/2019/08/20/claim-philippines-thitu/ (accessed 28.03.2020)

15. Chang F.K. A Faint Breeze of Change: Malaysia’s Relations with China. Foreign Policy Research Institute. https://www.fpri.org/article/2020/01/a-faint-breeze-of-change-malaysias-relations-with-china/ (accessed 29.03.2020)

16. Parameswaran P. What to Make of Malaysia’s New Defense White Paper Launch. The Diplomat, 04 December 2019. https://thediplomat.com/2019/12/what-to-make-of-malaysias-new-defense-white-paper/ (accessed 28.03.2020)

17. Suryadinata L. South China Sea: Is Jakarta no longer neutral? The Strait Times, 24 April 2014. https://www.straitstimes.com/opinion/south-china-sea-is-jakarta-no-longer-neutral (accessed 18.03.2020)

18. Yu M. Et tu, Jakarta? The Washington Times, 19 November 2015. https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/nov/19/inside-china-china-concedes-natuna-islands-to-indo/ (accessed 21.03.2020)

19. Brummitt C., Rahadiana R. Indonesia Will Defend South China Sea Territory With F-16 Fighter Jets. Bloomberg, 1 April 2016. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-03-31/indonesia-to-deploy-f-16s-to-guard-its-south-chinasea-territory (accessed 31.03.2020)

20. Philippines objects to Malaysia, China claims on South China Sea. GMA news online, 11 March 2020. https://www.gmanetwork.com/news/news/nation/729286/philippines-objects-to-malaysia-china-claims-on-south-chinasea/story/ (accessed 01.04.2020)

21. East Asia/Southeast Asia: Spratly Islands. The World Factbook, Central Intelligence. https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/pg.html (accessed 28.03.2020)

22. Alekseeva N. “Symbolical character”: Why China Places Missile Systems on Disputed Islands. Russia Today. 03.05.2018 (In Russ.). https://russian.rt.com/world/article/509130-arkhipelag-spratli-kitay-rakety (accessed 29.03.2020)

23. Mosyakov D. 2013. On the Verge of a Foul: China’s Policy in the South China Sea. Security Index. V. 19, № 4 (In Russ.)

24. Storey I. Disputes in the South China Sea: Southeast Asia’s Troubled Waters. Politique étrangère. Institut français des relations internationales (IFRI). Fall 2014, pp. 35-47.

25. Kanaev E.A. China’s and the US’ Approaches to the South China Sea Issue: Changing Patterns and Strategic Implications. Security and Cooperation in the South China Sea. M., Institute of Oriental Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences, 2014.

26. Wang Yi answered four questions regarding the Code of Conduct for the South China Sea. Xinhua News. 01.08.2019 (In Russ.). http://russian.news.cn/2019-08/01/c_138275212.htm (accessed 01.04.2020)

27. Kanaev E.A. Fostering Cooperative Trends in the South China Sea: Russian Perspective. International Conference on East Sea Disputes. Ho Chi Minh City: Ton Duc Thang University, 2014. P. 22.

28. China’s National Defense in the New Era. The State Council, the People’s Republic of China. P. 7. http://english.www.gov.cn/archive/whitepaper/201907/24/content_WS5d3941ddc6d08408f502283d.html (accessed 18.03.2020)

29. U.S.-China Strategic Competition in South and East China Seas: Background and Issues for Congress. Congressional Research Service. https://fas.org/sgp/crs/row/R42784.pdf (accessed 01.04.2020)

30. National Security Strategy of the United States of America. The White House. P. 46. https://www.whitehouse.gov/wpcontent/uploads/2017/12/NSS-Final-12-18-2017-0905.pdf (accessed 28.03.2020)

31. A Free and Open Indo-Pacific: Advancing a Shared Vision. The Department of State, United States of America. P. 6. https://www.state.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Free-and-Open-Indo-Pacific-4Nov2019.pdf (accessed 28.03.2020)