All
 
|
 
 


Adaptation on a russian sample of the short version of experience in close relationships-revised questionnaire
 
PIIS020595920000838-7-1
DOI10.31857/S020595920000838-7
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
K. Chistopolskaya 
Occupation: Junior research fellow of the suicidology department
Affiliation: V.P. Serbsky National Medical Research Centre of Psychiatry and Addiction
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
O. Mitina
Affiliation: Lomonosov Moscow State University
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
S. Enikolopov
Affiliation: Mental Health Research Centre
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
E. Nikolaev
Affiliation: Ulianov Chuvash State University
Address: Russian Federation
G. Semikin
Affiliation: Bauman Moscow State Technical University
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
S. Chubina
Affiliation: Kamenev Tula Regional Clinical Psychiatric Hospital N.1
Address: Russian Federation
S. Ozol
Affiliation: Pavlov Ryazan State Medical University
Address: Russian Federation
S. Drovosekov
Affiliation: Vyatka State University
Address: Russian Federation
Journal namePsikhologicheskii zhurnal
EditionVolume 39 №5
Pages87-98
Abstract

Adult romantic attachment is an important and promising subject of psychological research, which has an application in psychotherapy of various groups of patients and couples. The objective of the present study is to adapt the Experience in Close Relationships – Revised questionnaire on a Russian sample and to verify its construct validity on the basis of correlations with the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory and Hardiness Survey. The sample consisted of 793 students of technical, humanitarian and medical disciplines from Moscow, Cheboksary, Ryazan and Tula (369 females, 417 males, 7 undefined;aged 18–25, M = 20, SD = 2.1). We managed to compose a compact 14-item version of this questionnaire, which reflects best the studied phenomena. Confirmatory factor analysis of this model confirmed the structure of the inventory (CFI = .958, SRMR = .036, RMSEA = .047). The value of the Cronbach’s α for the anxious style of attachment scale is .881, for the avoidant style of attachment scale is .785. Pearson correlation analysis confirmed the positive relationship of the questionnaire’s scales with the scales of negative time perspective and negative relationship with the scales of positive time perspective and hardiness, which matches the main statements of the theory of adult attachment. The retest showed

high stability of the scales (r = .86 for anxious style of attachment and r = .77 for avoidant style of

attachment). Thus, the short Russian version of the Experience in Close Relationships – Revised questionnaire

is a valid and reliable instrument for the evaluation of styles of adult romantic attachment.

Keywordsadult attachment, romantic attachment, avoidant style, anxious style, secure style, hardiness, time perspective
Received02.11.2018
Publication date02.11.2018
Cite   Download pdf To download PDF you should sign in

Price publication: 0

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 5051

Readers community rating: votes 0 

1. Boulbi Dzh. Privyazannost'. M.: Gardariki, 2003.
2. Brish K. Terapiya narushenij privyazannosti. Ot teorii k praktike. M.: Kogito-Tsentr, 2012.
3. Burmenskaya G.V. Problemy onto- i filogeneza privyazannosti k materi v teorii Dzhona Boulbi // Privyazannost' / Dzh. Boulbi. M.: Gardariki, 2003. S. 5–20.
4. Kazantseva T.V. Adaptatsiya modifitsirovannoj metodiki “Opyt blizkikh otnoshenij” K. Brennan i R.K. Frejli // Pedagogika, psikhologiya, teoriya i metodika obucheniya. 2008. T. 74. № 2. S. 139–143.
5. Leont'ev D.A., Rasskazova E.I. Test zhiznestojkosti. M.: Smysl, 2006.
6. Mitina O.V. Modelirovanie latentnykh izmenenij s pomosch'yu strukturnykh uravnenij // Ehksperimental'naya psikhologiya. 2008. № 1. S. 131–148.
7. Sabel'nikova N.V., Kashirskij D.V. Oprosnik privyazannosti k blizkim lyudyam // Psikhologicheskij zhurnal. 2015. T. 36. № 4. S. 84–97.
8. Syrtsova A., Mitina O.V. Vozrastnaya dinamika vremennykh orientatsij lichnosti // Voprosy psikhologii. 2008. № 2. S. 41–54.
9. Chistopol'skaya K.A., Enikolopov S.N. Otnoshenie k smerti posle popytki samoubijstva: stigmatizatsiya i samostigmatizatsiya suitsidal'nykh patsientov // Vestnik psikhiatrii i psikhologii Chuvashii. 2015. T. 11. № 1. S. 8–20.
10. Chistopol'skaya K.A., Enikolopov S.N., Nikolaev E.L., Semikin G.I., Kazantseva V.N. Adaptatsiya metodiki “Opyt blizkikh otnoshenij — pererabotannyj oprosnik” na russkoyazychnoj vyborke i izuchenie stilej privyazannosti molodykh lyudej v ostrom postsuitside // Psikhologicheskaya diagnostika. 2015. № 1. S. 6–23.
11. Ainsworth M., Blehar M., Waters E., Wall S. Patterns of attachment: Assessed in the Strange Situation and at home. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1978.
12. Bartholomew K. Avoidance of intimacy: An attachment perspective // Journal of social and personal relationships. 1990. V. 7. № P. 147–178.
13. Bartholomew K., Horowitz, L.M. Attachment styles among young adults: A test of a four-category model // Journal of personality and social psychology. 1991. V. 61. P. 226–244.
14. Brennan K., Clark C., Shaver P. Self-report measurement of adult romantic attachment: An integrative overview // Attachment theory and close relationships / Eds. J. Simpson, W. Rholes. N.Y.: Guilford Press, 1998. P. 46–76.
15. Busonera A., Martini P.S., Zavattini G.C., Santona A. Psychometric properties of an Italian version of the Experiences in Close Relationships-Revised (ECR-R) Scale // Psychological reports. 2014. V. 114. № 3. P. 785–801.
16. Byrne B.M. Structural equation modeling with Mplus: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. N.Y.: Routledge, 2012.
17. Ehrenthal J.C., Dinger U., Lamla A., Funken B., Schauenburg H. Evaluation of the German version of the attachment questionnaire “Experiences in Close Relationships-Revised” (ECR-RD) // Psychotherapie, psychosomatik, medizinische psychologie. 2009. V. 59. № 6. P. 215–223.
18. Ein-Dor T., Doron G., Solomon Z., Mikulincer M., Shaver P.R. Together in pain: Attachment-related dyadic processes and posttraumatic stress disorder // Journal of counseling psychology. 2010. V. 57. № 3. P. 317–327.
19. Fraley R.C., Waller N.G., Brennan K.A. An item response theory analysis of self-report measures of adult attachment. // Journal of personality and social psychology. 2000. V. 78. № 2. P. 350– 365.
20. George C., Solomon J. Attachment and caregiving: The caregiving behavioral system // Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications / Eds. J. Cassidy, P.R. Shaver. N.Y.: Guilford Press. 1999. P. 649–670.
21. Granqvist P., Mikulincer M., Gewirtz V., Shaver P.R. Experimental findings on God as an attachment figure: Normative processes and moderating effects on internal working models // Journal of personality and social psychology. 2012. V. 103. № 5. P. 804–818.
22. Hanak N., Dmitrijevic A. A Serbian version of modified and Revised Experiences in Close Relationships scale (SM-ECR-R) // Journal of personality assessment. 2013. V. 95. № 5. P. 530–538.
23. Hart J., Shaver P, Goldenberg J. Attachment, self-esteem,worldviews, and terror management: Evidence for a tripartite security system // Journal of personality and social psychology. 2005. V. 88. № 6. P. 999–1013.
24. Hazan C., Shaver P. Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. // Journal of personality and social psychology. 1987. V. 52. № 3. P. 511–524.
25. Hoff-Esbjorn B., Breinholst S., Niclasen J., Skovgaard L.F., Lange K., Reinholdt-Dunne M.L. Identifying the best-fitting factor structure of the Experience of Close Relations – Revised in a Scandinavian example // PLoS ONE. 2015. V. 10. № 9. e0137218.
26. Jacobvitz D., Curran M., Moller N. Measurement of adult attachment: The place of self-report and interview methodologies // Attachment and human development. 2002. V. 4. № 2. P. 207–215.
27. Kim S.-H., Sherry A.R., Lee Y.-S., Kim C.-D. Psychometric properties of a translated Korean adult attachment measure // Measurement and evaluation in counseling and development. 2011. V. 44. № 3. P. 135– 150.
28. Kooiman C.G., Klaassens E.R., van Heloma Lugt J.Q., Kamperman A.M. Psychometrics and validity of the Dutch experiences in Close Relationships–Revised (ECR–r) in an outpatient mental health sample // Journal of personality assessment. 2013. V. 95. № 2. P. 217–224.
29. Lavy S., Mikulincer M., Shaver P.R. Intrusiveness from an attachment theory perspective: A dyadic diary study // Personality and individual differences. 2013. V. 55. № 8. P. 972–977.
30. Maddi S. Dispositional hardiness in health and effectiveness // Encyclopedia of mental health / Ed. H.S. Friedman. San Diego (CA): Academic Press, 1998. P. 323–335.
31. Main M., & Solomon J. (1986). Discovery of a new, insecuredisorganized / disoriented attachment pattern. // Affective development in infancy / Eds. Yogman M. & Brazelton T. B. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. P. 95–124.
32. Mikulincer M., Shaver P. Attachment in adulthood: Structure, dynamics, and change. N.Y.: Guilford Press. 2010.
33. Rotaru T.-S., Rusu A. Psychometric properties of the Romanian version of Experiences in Close Relationships-Revised questionnaire (ECR-R) // Procedia — Social and behavioral sciences. 2013. V. 78. P. 51–55.
34. Shaver P.R., Belsky J., Brennan K.A. The Adult Attachment Interview and self-reports of romantic attachment: Associations across domains and methods // Personal relationships. 2000. V. 7. № 1. P. 25–43.
35. Shaver P.R., Mikulincer M. What do self-report attachment measures assess? // Adult attachment: New directions and emerging issues / Eds. J.A. Simpson, W.S. Rholes. New York: Guilford Press. 2004. P. 17–54.
36. Sibley C.G., Fischer R., Liu J.H. Reliability and validity of the Revised Experiences in Close Relationships (ECR-R) self-report measure of adult romantic attachment // Personality and social psychology bulletin. 2005. V. 31. № 11. P. 1524–1536.
37. Tolmacz R., Mikulincer M. The sense of entitlement in romantic relationships – scale construction, factor structure, construct validity, and its associations with attachment orientations // Psychoanalytical psychology. 2011. V. 28. № 1. P. 75–94.
38. Wongpakaran T., Wongpakaran N. A short version of the revised ‘Experience of Close Relationships Questionnaire’: Investigating non-clinical and clinical samples // Clinical practice and epidemiology in mental health. 2012. V. 8. P. 36–42.
39. Zilcha-Mano S., Mikulincer M., Shaver P.R. Pet in the therapy room: An attachment perspective on Animal Assisted Therapy // Attachment and human development. 2011. V. 13. № 6. P. 541–561.
40. Zimbardo P., Boyd J. Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individual-differences metric // Journal of personality and social psychology. 1999. V. 77. № 6. R. 1271–1288.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up