All
 
|
 
 


Reciprocity in Mutual Aid Networks (on the Data of a Regional Study)
 
PIIS013216250004283-4-1
DOI10.31857/S013216250004283-4
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Evgeniy V. Reutov 
Affiliation: Belgorod National Research University
Address: Russian Federation, Belgorod
Marina N. Reutova
Affiliation: Belgorod National Research University
Address: Russian Federation, Belgorod
Irina V. Shavyrina
Affiliation: State Technological University named after V.G. Shukhov
Address: Russian Federation, Belgorod
Journal nameSotsiologicheskie issledovaniya
EditionIssue 3
Pages106-117
Abstract

The article analyzes the role of the reciprocity principle in the reproduction of social networks and the functioning of mutual assistance practices in local communities based on the results of author’s empirical studies. Reciprocity is considered a principle of interpersonal and social relations, presupposing the existence of explicit and latent mutual obligations among their participants. Empirical diagnostics was centered on parameters of family-related, friendly, neighborly, professional networks of mutual aid as intensity and regularity of functioning, the focus of resource transfers, the nature of mutuality of obligations, motivation for the exchange of resources. The exchange of resources with parents and full-grown children is characterized by the highest degree of intensity. Most participants in such exchanges do not expect an equivalent volume of response services, and these interactions themselves have the character of generalized reciprocity. As we move toward «weak» ties (neighbors, colleagues, acquaintances), the attitude of balanced reciprocity dominates: receiving assistance, 50 to 57% of respondents expect an equivalent return. In the motivation of mutual aid, the attitude to a balanced reciprocity is most clearly expressed in professional and neighboring networks. In relations with friends, it is balanced by emotional-value and existential motives, which are dominant in family-related relationships. The normative significance of the principle of reciprocity and its system-forming character in various types of mutual aid networks is substantiated, and it has been proved that reciprocity in family ties has, first of all, an emotional-psychological and value background, in other networks of mutual aid the balanced nature of resource exchanges is a condition for their stable functioning.

Keywordsmutual aid, networks of mutual aid, adaptation, reciprocity, transfer of resources
AcknowledgmentThe study was funded by RFBR research project No 17-03-00196.
Received20.03.2019
Publication date25.03.2019
Number of characters31439
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 3, views: 3465

Readers community rating: votes 0 

1. Barel Y. (1983) La société du vide. Paris: Seuil. (In Fr.)
2. Barsukova   S.Yu.  (2004)   Reciprocal   interactions.   Essence,   functions,   specificit y.  Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological studies]. No. 9: 20 –29. (In Russ.)
3. Castells M. (2000) The Rise of the Network Society. Second Edition. Oxford:  Blackwell.
4. Granovetter M. (1973) The Strength of Weak  Ties. American Journal of Sociology. Vol. 78. No. 6: 1360–1380.
5. Latour B. (2014) Reassembling the Social: an Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Moscow: VShE. (In Russ.)
6. Reutov E.V. (2017) Social Solidarit y in Public Discourse (Experience of regional Study). Sociologicheskaya nauka  i social'naya praktika [Sociological Science and  Social Practice]. No. 3: 111–125.  (In Russ.)
7. Reutov E.V., Kolpina L.V., Reutova M.N., Boyarinova I.V. (2011) The Effectiveness of Social Networks in the Regional Community. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. 2011. No. 1: 79–88. (In Russ.)
8. Reutov E.V., Reutova M.N., Shav yrina I.V. (2011) Micro-practices of Solidarit y in the Social Space  of the Local Communit y: a Monograph. Belgorod: BGTU. (In Russ.)
9. Sahlins M. (1999) Zur Soziologie des  primitiven Tauschs.  Berliner Journal für Soziologie. Nu. 9: 149 –178. (In Germ.)
10. Shtejnberg I.E. (2004) Psychology of Inequivalent Exchanges in Net works of Social Support for Urban and  Rural Families. Vestnik obshchestvennogo mneniya: Dannye.   Analiz. Diskussii [The Russian Public Opinion Herald. Data. Analysis. Discussions]. No. 6(74): 52–57. (In Russ.)
11. Shtejnberg  I.E.  (2010)  Paradigm  4 «K» in  the Research  of  Social  Support  Net works.  Sociologicheskie Issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 5: 40 –50. (In Russ.)
12. Stegbauer C. (2002) Reziprozität. Einführung in soziale Formen der Gegenseitigkeit. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag. (In Germ.)

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up