Architectural and planning design of Sintashta-Petrovka settlements and the issue of the Bronze Age warfare

The research aims to explore rationality that ordered the construction of the Late Bronze Age Sintashta-Petrovka nucleated villages. For a long time, it has been the conventional knowledge that the settlements were fortresses that served to protect people in the hostile environments. However, careful consideration of main attributes of their fortifications and natural environmental settings allows us to suggest a different interpretation. From our point of view, the systems of walls and ditches had to be constructed to protect the villages from the seasonal floods and harsh winter conditions. This protection was vital for keeping the livestock and allowing of its successful reproduction and adding surplus. Our conclusion is supported with a number of important observations including a relatively low average height of the walls; lack of standardization in the construction of ditches; and intentional choice of the least protected spots like bottoms of the rivers’ valleys. Finally, we argue that social complexity that allows such public projects had roots not in the hostile environments, but in pastoral subsistence system. Successful management of herds permitted some people to achieve the elevated social statuses and gave them the power to organize the life of others.

Keywords

Bronze Age, settlement archaeology, landscape archaeology, Sintashta, Petrovka, fortress, political anthropology

Received

15.10.2018

Publication date

15.10.2018

Number of characters

1308

Cite Download pdf To download PDF you should sign in

GOST	Chechushkov I., Yakimov A., Dakovic G. Architectural and planning design of Sintashta-Petrovka settlements and the issue of the Bronze Age warfare // Rossiiskaia arkheologiia – 2018. – Issue 3 C. 75-92 [Electronic resource]. URL: http://ras.jes.su/ra/s207987840000894-2-1-en (circulation date: 25.04.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S086960630001661-6
MLA	Chechushkov, Igor, Yakimov, Artem, Dakovic, Gligor "Architectural and planning design of Sintashta-Petrovka settlements and the issue of the Bronze Age warfare." Rossiiskaia arkheologiia 3 (2018):75-92. DOI: 10.31857/S086960630001661-6
APA	Chechushkov I., Yakimov A., Dakovic G. (2018). Architectural and planning design of Sintashta-Petrovka settlements and the issue of the Bronze Age warfare. Rossiiskaia arkheologiia (3), pp.75-92 DOI: 10.31857/S086960630001661-6

Размещенный ниже текст является ознакомительной версией и может не соответствовать печатной

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Anisimov N. P., 2009. Arkaim – the country of kardas: space empirics of the Trans-Urals environment. Akademicheskiy vestnik UralNIIproekt RAASN [Academic Bulletin of UralNIIproekt RAASN], 2, pp. 16–21. (In Russ.)

2. Arkush E. N., 2011. Hillforts of the Ancient Andes. Gainesville: University Press of Florida. 320 p.

3. Bendrey R., 2011. Some Like It Hot: Environmental Determinism and the Pastoral Economies of the Later Prehistoric Eurasian Steppe. Pastoralism: Research, Policy and Practice, vol. 1, iss. 8, pp. 1–16.

4. Berseneva N. A., 2010. Otchet ob arkheologicheskoy razvedke v doline r. Akmulla (basseyn r. Karagayly-Ayat, verkhnee techenie) v 2009 godu [Report on the archaeological investigation in the Akmullah River Valley (the basin of the Karagayli-Ayat River, the upper stream) in 2009]. Chelyabinsk: Yuzh. – U ral. filial Instituta istorii i arkheologii UrO RAN. 336 р. (Unpublished).

5. Berseneva N. A., Epimakhov A. V., Noskevich V. V., Fedorova N. V., 2015. Capabilities of synthesizing geophysical and archaeological information in the interpretation of excavation results (by the example of the Bronze Age settlement of Kamenny Ambar). Vestnik arkheologii, antropologii I etnografii [Bulletin of Archaeology, Anthropology and Ethnography], 1(28), pp. 4–14.

6. Carneiro R. L., 1998. What Happened at Flashpoint? Conjectures on Chiefdom Formation at the Very Moment of Conception. Chiefdoms and Chieftaincy in the Americas. E. M. Redman, ed. Gainesville: University Press of Florida, pp. 18–42.

7. Chechushkov I. V., 2015. Geostatistical methods in investigating the Bronze Age settlement sites. Etnicheskie vzaimodeystviya na Yuzhnom Urale: materialy VI Vserossiyskoy nauchnoy konferentsii [Enthic Interaction in the Southern Urals: Proceedings of the VI All-Russian Scientific Conference]. Chelyabinsk: Chelyabinskiy gosudarstvennyy kraevedcheskiy muzey, pp. 90–96. (In Russ.)

8. Chernykh E. N., Lebedeva E. Yu., Zhurbin I. V., Lopes-Saets Kh.A., Lopes-Garsiya P., Martines-Navarrete M. I. N., 2002. Kargaly [Kargaly], 2. Gornyy – poselenie epokhi pozdney bronzy: Topografiya, litolotiya, stratigrafiya: Proizvodstvenno-bytovye i sakral’nye sooruzheniya: Otnositel’naya i absolyutnaya khronologiya [Gorny – a settlement of the Late Bronze Age: topography, lithology, stratigraphy: production-economic and sacral structures: relative and absolute chronology]. Moscow: Yazyki slavyanskoy kul’tury. 184 p.

9. Epimakhov A. V., Sem’yan I.A., 2016. Arrowheads of Kamenny Ambar settlement and some remarks on the military conflicts in the Sintashta society. Ural’skiy istoricheskiy vestnik [Ural Historical Journal], 53, pp. 77–84. (In Russ.)

10. Etimologicheskiy slovar’ russkogo yazyka [Etymological dictionary of the Russian language], 5. A. G. Preobrazhenskiy, comp. Moscow: Tipografiya G. Lissnera i D. Sobko, 1912.

11. Fasmer M., 1986. Etimologicheskiy slovar’ russkogo yazyka [Etymological dictionary of the Russian language], 2. Trans. from German. 2nd edition, stereotyped. Moscow: Progress. 672 p.

12. Fedorova N. V., Noskevich V. V., 2012. Reconstruction of the layout of the Bronze Age fortified settlements in the Southern Urals (Olgino and Konoplyanka) based on detailed magnetic survey. Ural’skiy geofizicheskiy vestnik [Ural Geophysical Bulletin], 1(19), pp. 52–59. (In Russ.)

13. Fedorova N. V., Noskevich V. V., Ivanchenko V. S., Bebnev A. S., Malikov A. V., 2013. Geophysical methods for investigating archaeological sites of Sarym-Sakly and Vorovskaya Yama (the Southern Urals). Ural’skiy geofizicheskiy vestnik [Ural Geophysical Bulletin], 2(22), pp. 46–53. (In Russ.)

14. Gening V. F., Zdanovich G. B., Gening V. V., 1992. Sintashta: Arkheologicheskie pamyatniki ariyskikh plemen Uralo-Kazakhstanskikh stepey [Sintashta: Archaeological sites of the Arian tribes of Ural and Kazakh steppe]. Chelyabinsk: Yuzhno-Ural’skoe knizhnoe izdatel’stvo. 408 p.

15. Keeley L. H., Fontana M., Quick R., 2007. Baffles and Bastions: The Universal Features of Fortifications. Journal of Archaeological Research, vol. 15, iss 1, pp. 55–95.

16. Kelly R. C., 2000. Warless Societies and the Origin of War. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. 192 p.

17. Khenks B. K., Chechushkov I. V., Dunan R. K., Pitman D., Muzhich B., Medarich I., Mori M., 2013. Recent results and prospects of research on the microdistrict of the ancient settling in Ustie and the Lower Toguzak valley. Drevnee Ust’e: ukreplennoe poselenie bronzovogo veka v Yuzhnom Zaural’e [Ancient Ustie: a fortified settlement of the Bronze Age in the Southern Urals]. Chelyabinsk: Abris, pp. 392–416. (In Russ.)

18. Khokhlova O. S., Khokhlov A. A., Gol’eva A.A., Zdanovich G. B., Malyutina T. S., 2008. Scientific research on Big Sintashta mound in Chelyabinsk region. Vestnik Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Bulletin of Orenburg State University], 10(92), pp. 150–156. (In Russ.)

19. Koryakova L. N., Krauze R., Epimakhov A. V., Sharapova S. V., Panteleeva S. E., Berseneva N. A., Fornas’e Y., Kayzer E., Molchanov I. V., Chechushkov I. V., 2011. Archaeological studies of the fortified settlement of Kamenny Ambar (Olgino). Arkheologiya, etnografiya i antropologiya Evrazii [Archaeology, Ethnology, and Anthropology of Eurasia], 4(48), pp. 64–74. (In Russ.)

20. Krause R., Koryakova L. N., 2013. Multidisciplinary Investigations of the Bronze Age Settlements in the Southern Trans-Urals (Russia). Bonn: Habelt. 352 p.

21. Levit A. I., 2005. Yuzhnyy Ural: geografiya, ekologiya i prirodopol’zovanie [The Southern Urals: geography, ecology, and environment management]. Chelyabinsk: Yuzhno-Ural’skoe knizhnoe izdatel’stvo. 246 p.

22. Noskevich V. V., Fedorova N. V., Murav’ev L.A., 2010. Magnetometric mapping of archaeological sites. Ural’skiy geofizicheskiy vestnik [Ural Geophysical Bulletin], 2(17), pp. 47–52. (In Russ.)

23. Parkinson W. A., Duffy P. R., 2007. Fortifications and Enclosures in European Prehistory: A Cross-cultural Perspective. Journal of Archaeological Research, vol. 15, iss. 2, pp. 97–141.

24. Petrov F. N., 2009. Poselenie Arkaim v kul’turnom prostranstve epokhi bronzy [Arkaim settlement in the Bronze Age cultural environment]. Dubna: Fond “Nasledie”. 64 p.

25. Rappoport P. A., 1965. Drevnie russkie kreposti [Ancient Russian fortresses]. Moscow: Nauka. 88 p.

26. Sem’yan I.A., 2012. Warfare in the Sintashta and Petrovka cultures: source review. Vestnik Yuzhno-Ural’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Bulletin of the South Ural State University], 32, pp. 49–51. (In Russ.)

27. Sharapova S. V., Krauze R., Molchanov I. V., Shtobbe A., Soldatkin N. V., 2014. Mutlidisciplinary investigations of Konoplyanka settlement in the Southern Trans-Urals: preliminary results. Vestnik Novosibirskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Istoriya, filologiya [Bulletin of Novosibirsk State University. Series: History, Philology], vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 101–109. (In Russ.)

28. Vinogradov N. B., 2011. Stepi Yuzhnogo Urala i Kazakhstana v pervye veka II tys. do n.e. (pamyatniki sintashtinskogo i petrovskogo tipa) [The steppe of the Southern Urals and Kazakhstan in the early centuries of the 2nd millennium BCE (the sites of Sintashta and Petrovka type)]. Chelyabinsk: Abris. 175 p.

29. Vinogradov N. B., 2013. Drevnee Ust’e. Ukreplennoe poselenie bronzovogo veka v Yuzhnom Zaural’e [Ancient Ustie: a fortified settlement of the Bronze Age in the Southern Trans-Urals]. Chelyabinsk: Abris. 482 p.

30. Zdanovich G. B., 1995. Arkaim. The Arians in the Urals or a failed civilization. Arkaim: Issledovaniya. Poiski. Otkrytiya [Arkaim: Studies. Search. Discoveries]. N. O. Ivanova, comp. Chelyabinsk: Tvorcheskoe ob”edinenie “Kamennyy poyas”, pp. 21–42. (In Russ.)

31. Zdanovich G. B., 2011. “Fortification”, “fortress” in the archaeological studies of the Sintashta-Arkaim culture and in the “Rig-Veda” poetic tradition. Voprosy arkheologii Urala: sbornik nauchnykh trudov [Issues of the Ural Archaeology: Collection of papers], 26. Ekaterinburg, Surgut: Magellan, pp. 40–63. (In Russ.)

32. Zdanovich G. B., Batanina I. M., 1995. The “Land of Cities” – fortified Bronze Age settlements of the 18th–17th centuries BCE in the Southern Urals. Arkaim: Issledovaniya. Poiski. Otkrytiya [Arkaim: Studies. Search. Discoveries]. N. O. Ivanova, comp. Chelyabinsk: Tvorcheskoe ob”edinenie “Kamennyy poyas”, pp. 54–62. (In Russ.)

33. Zdanovich G. B., Batanina I. M., 2007. Arkaim – Strana gorodov. Prostranstvo i obrazy [Arkaim – the Land of Cities. Space and images]. Chelyabinsk: Krokus. 260 p.

34. Etimologicheskiy slovar’ russkogo yazyka [Etymological dictionary of the Russian language], 5. A. G. Preobrazhenskiy, comp. Moscow: Tipografiya G. Lissnera i D. Sobko, 1912. (In Russ.)