Inter-Civilizational Dimension of BRICS

 
PIIS207987840008066-1-1
DOI10.18254/S207987840008066-1
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Affiliation: MGIMO University
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Journal nameISTORIYA
EditionIssue 11 (85)
Abstract

The BRICS is one of the alternative projects for building a multipolar world. The BRICS was created as an association of the largest developing countries seeking to reform the existing world order. The purpose of this article is to analyze the main factors of the inter-civilizational dimension of the BRICS. The uniqueness of this formation is that it unites countries not only with different socio-economic models, but also with different cultural and civilizational characteristics. The BRICS is primarily a dialogue platform for discussing major international issues. The BRICS foreign policy line is characterized by the desire to solve its strategic tasks without confrontation with NATO. At the same time, foreign policy of the BRICS countries is based on a solid foundation: the military-political and economic potential of the Member States. The BRICS is putting forward new approaches to reforming the system of international regulation. This also applies to the economic sphere. The BRICS countries believe that the global economic system is going through a serious crisis and needs profound changes in order to ensure equal conditions for all countries. Inter-civilizational aspects are also seen in economic cooperation within the BRICS. By historical standards, it is too early to talk about the results of the BRICS activities. However, it is obvious that it can become a new world center of influence, despite the differences in the political, cultural and civilizational specifics and different levels of economic development of the BRICS Member States.

KeywordsBRICS, inter-civilizational dimension, a multipolar world, an alternative project, South Africa, Brazil, India, China, Russia
Received27.05.2019
Publication date30.12.2019
Number of characters37731
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 257

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Aksakov A. NKI BRIKS Byulleten' № 96. 14.10.2018.

2. Astakhov E. M. Takie raznye strany — chleny BRIKS. I vse-taki vmeste // Mezhdunarodnaya zhizn'. 2018. № 8. C. 117—126.

3. Davydova V. M. (pod red.) BRIKS — Latinskaya Amerika: pozitsionirovanie i vzaimodejstvie. M., 2014.

4. Vinogradov A. V. Strategiya Rossii v BRIKS: tseli i instrumenty: cb. statej / Nikonova V. A., Toloraya G. D. (pod red.) M., 2013.

5. Dorado, V., Vargas, O. Bol'sonaro i novyj latinoamerikanskij poryadok // VIGIL Journal Rossiya v Novom Svete. 08.11.2018 [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: http://vigiljournal.com/ru/node/787 (data dostupa: 12.11.2018).

6. Lisovolik Ya. Valdaj 05.10.2018. NKI BRIKS Byulleten' № 96. 18.10.2018.

7. Martynov B. F., Ivanovskij Z. V., Simonova L. N., Okuneva L. S. Klyuchevye interesy i tselevye orientiry Brazilii, kak uchastnitsy formata BRIKS // Nikonova V. A., Toloraya G. Eh. (pod red.) Strategiya Rossii v BRIKS: tseli i instrumenty: sb. statej. M., 2013.

8. Nikonov V. A. NKI BRIKS Byulleten' № 96. 18.10.2018.

9. Putin V. V. Rossiya i menyayuschijsya mir // Moskovskie novosti. 27.02.2012. URL: http://mn.ru/politics/20120227/312306749.html (data dostupa: 20.11.2018).

10. Toloraya G. D. Rossiya i BRIKS: Perspektivy i vozmozhnosti // Zhurnal «Strategiya Rossii». 2015. № 6 (138). S. 7—14.

11. Dokumenty, prinyatye po itogam sammita BRIKS // Ofitsial'nyj sajt Prezidenta Rossii. 09.07.2015 [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: http://kremlin.ru/supplement/5002 (data dostupa: 12.11.2018).

12. Simon, R., Winter, B. Trumpism Comes to Brazil // Foreign Affairs. 28.10.2018 [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/brazil/2018-10-28/trumpism-comes-brazil?cid=int-flb&pgtype=hpg (data obrascheniya:10.11.2018).

13. Bharthur S. New World Information and Communication Order and BRICS: Legacies and relevance // Global Media and China. 2018. Vol. 3. Iss. 2. P. 113—116 [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/2059436418785029 (data obrascheniya: 10.02.2019).

14. Cooper A. F., Farooq A. B. The Role of China and India in the G20 and BRICS: Commonalities or Competitive Behaviour? // Journal of Current Chinese Affairs. 2016. Vol. 45. Iss. 3. 2016 [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/186810261604500303 (data obrascheniya: 03.02.2019)

15. Ferchen M. China-Latin America Relations: Long-term Boon or Short-term Boom? // The Chinese Journal of International Politics. 2011. Vol. 4. Iss. 1. P. 55—86.

16. Korolev A. Systemic Balancing and Regional Hedging: China-Russia Relations // The Chinese Journal of International Politics. 2016. Vol. 9. Iss. 4. P. 375—397.

17. Lissovolik Y., Vinokurov E. Extending BRICS to BRICS+: the potential for development finance, connectivity and financial stability. Area Development and Policy. 28 Jan 2019 [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/23792949.2018.1535246 (data obrascheniya: 08.02.2019)

18. Miller M. C. The Role of Beliefs in Identifying Rising Powers // The Chinese Journal of International Politics. 2016. Vol. 9. Iss. 2. P. 211—238.

19. Pang X., Liu L., Ma S., China’s Network Strategy for Seeking Great Power Status // The Chinese Journal of International Politics. 2017. Vol. 10. Iss. 1. P. 1—29.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up