Necessary complicity as a sign of corruption crime

The Criminal Code of the Russian Federation does not use the term "corruption crimes", despite this, they form an independent group of attacks. The author of the article considers the necessary complicity to be the prize of corruption crime along with the obligatory participation of a special subject in it-an official who uses his official powers or position, and the mercenary orientation. The stated position is argued by examples of corruption crimes already provided for in the criminal code of the Russian Federation: bribery and illegal participation in business activities. Taking into account the previous research and novelties of the foreign legislator, it is proposed to Supplement the Criminal Law with new anti-corruption norms. The article analyzes the articles contained in the criminal codes of the Kyrgyz Republic and Ukraine, providing for responsibility for illegal enrichment. One of the shortcomings of the relevant Convention norm and the existing examples of criminalization of illicit enrichment of officials in the criminal codes of other states is the impunity of those who contributed to this enrichment. The author offers a solution to this problem.

Keywords

corruption, corruption crimes, required participation, bribery, illegal participation in entrepreneurial activities, corrupt deal, indirect signs of corruption, illicit enrichment, promote illegal term enrichment

Received

19.08.2019

Publication date

20.09.2019

Number of characters

28007

Cite

GOST	Borkov V. Necessary complicity as a sign of corruption crime // Gosudarstvo i pravo – 2019. – Issue 8 C. 23-30 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://gospravo-journal.ru/S013207690006239-4-1 (circulation date: 24.04.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S013207690006239-4
MLA	Borkov, Viktor "Necessary complicity as a sign of corruption crime." Gosudarstvo i pravo 8 (2019):23-30. DOI: 10.31857/S013207690006239-4
APA	Borkov V. (2019). Necessary complicity as a sign of corruption crime. Gosudarstvo i pravo (8), pp.23-30 DOI: 10.31857/S013207690006239-4

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 2, views: 1070

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Borkov V.N. Crimes against the implementation of state functions, carried out by officials. M., 2016. P. 193 (in Russ.).

2. Borkov V.N. Crimes against the implementation of state functions, carried out by officials: autoabstract dis. ... Doctor of Law. Omsk, 2015. P. 15, 26 (in Russ.).

3. Borkov V.N. Criminal-legal anti-corruption. Omsk, 2014. P. 143 164 (in Russ.).

4. What is important is not the size of the bribe, but the principle of inevitability of punish-ment: an interview with the initial gubep and the PC of the interior Ministry Andrei Kurnosenko on combating corruption and protecting budget funds // Kommersant. 2018. March 16 (in Russ.).

5. Volzhenkin B.V. Office crimes. M., 2000. P. 193 (in Russ.).

6. Criminal Code of the Kyrgyz Republic [Electronic resource] Access mode: URL: http://cbd.minjust.gov.kg/act/view/ru-ru/111527 (accessed: 10.03.2018) (in Russ.).

7. The Criminal Code of Ukraine [Electronic resource] Access mode: URL: http://meget.kiev.ua/kodeks/ugolovniy-kodeks/razdel-1-17/ (accessed: 10.03.2018) (in Russ.).

8. Lopashenko N.A. Infringement of property. M., 2012. P. 500 (in Russ.).

9. Khabrieva T. Ya. Corruption and the law: doctrinal approaches to statement of a problem // Journal of Ross. rights. 2012. No. 6. P. 16 (in Russ.).

10. Chaika Yu. Ya. Report on the meeting of the Council of Federation of the Federal Assem-bly of the Russian Federation on 27 April, 2016 [Electronic resource] Access mode: URL: http://genproc.gov.ru/smi/interview_and_appearences/appearences/1078222/ (accessed: 17.07.2017) (in Russ.).